SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Abraham J, Kwan P, Champod C, Lennard C, and Roux C. 2012. An AFIS candidate list centric fingerprint likelihood ratio model based on morphometric and spatial analyses (MSA). In: Yang J, and Xie SJ, editors. New trends and developments in biometrics. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech. p 221250.
  • Adams BJ. 2003a. The diversity of adult dental patterns in the United States and the implications for personal identification. J Forensic Sci 48:497504.
  • Adams BJ. 2003b. Establishing personal identification based on specific patterns of missing, filled, and unrestored teeth. J Forensic Sci 48:487496.
  • Adams BJ, Byrd JE. 2006. Resolution of small-scale commingling: a case report from the Vietnam War. Forensic Sci Int 156:6369.
  • Agresti A, Coull BA. 1998. Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Stat 52:119126.
  • Albert J. 1997. Teaching Bayes' rule: a data-oriented approach. Am Stat 51:247253.
  • Albert J. 2009. Bayesian computation with R. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Albert JH. 1996. Bayesian computation using Minitab. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
  • Alonso A, Martín P, Albarrán C, de Simon P, Iturralde M, Fernandez-Rodriguez A, Atienza I, Capilla J, Garcia-Hirschfeld J, Martinez P. 2005. Challenges of DNA profiling in mass disaster investigations. Croat Med J 46:540.
  • Babb PL, Fernandez Duque E, Baiduc CA, Gagneux P, Evans S, Schurr TG. 2011. mtDNA diversity in Azara's owl monkeys (Aotus azarai azarai) of the Argentinean Chaco. Am J Phys Anthropol 146:209224.
  • Barik S, Sahani R, Prasad B, Endicott P, Metspalu M, Sarkar B, Bhattacharya S, Annapoorna P, Sreenath J, Sun D. 2008. Detailed mtDNA genotypes permit a reassessment of the settlement and population structure of the Andaman Islands. Am J Phys Anthropol 136:1927.
  • Bartlett M. 1937. Sub-sampling for attributes. Suppl J R Stat Soc 4:131135.
  • Bayes T. 1763. An essay toward solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philos T R Soc Lond 53:370418.
  • Beaumont MA, Zhang W, Balding DJ. 2002. Approximate Bayesian computation in population genetics. Genetics 162:20252035.
  • Berger JO, Berry DA. 1988. Statistical analysis and the illusion of objectivity. Am Sci 76:159165.
  • Berkvens D, Speybroeck N, Praet N, Adel A, Lesaffre E. 2006. Estimating disease prevalence in a Bayesian framework using probabilistic constraints. Epidemiology 17:145153.
  • Bernard HR. 2011. Research methods in anthropology. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
  • Berry DA. 1996. Statistics: a Bayesian perspective. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
  • Berry DA. 1997. Teaching elementary Bayesian statistics with real applications in science. Am Stat 51:241246.
  • Boattini A, Castrì L, Sarno S, Useli A, Cioffi M, Sazzini M, Garagnani P, De Fanti S, Pettener D, Luiselli D. 2013. mtDNA variation in East Africa unravels the history of afro-asiatic groups. Am J Phys Anthropol 150:375385.
  • Bocquet-Appel J-P, Bacro JN. 2008. Estimation of an age distribution with its confidence intervals using an iterative Bayesian procedure and a bootstrap sampling approach. In: Bocquet-Appel JP, editor. Recent advances in paleodemography. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. p 6382.
  • Bocquet-Appel J-P, Masset C. 1982. Farewell to paleodemography. J Hum Evol 11:321333.
  • Boldsen JL. 2001. Epidemiological approach to the paleopathological diagnosis of leprosy. Am J Phys Anthropol 115:380387.
  • Branscum A, Gardner I, Johnson W. 2004. Bayesian modeling of animal-and herd-level prevalences. Prev Vet Med 66:101112.
  • Brenner CH, Weir BS. 2003. Issues and strategies in the DNA identification of World Trade Center victims. Theor Popul Biol 63:173178.
  • Brooks S, Gelman A, Jones G, Meng X-L, editors. 2011. Handbook of Markov chain Monte Carlo. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  • Brown LD, Cai TT, DasGupta A. 2001. Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Stat Sci 16:101117.
  • Brown PJ. 1993. Measurement, regression, and calibration. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Budowle B, Ge J, Chakraborty R, Gill-King H. 2011. Use of prior odds for missing persons identifications. Investigative Genetics 2:15.
  • Budowle B, Moretti TR. 1999. Genotype profiles for six population groups at the 13 CODIS short tandem repeat core loci and other PCR-based loci. Forensic Sci Commun 1:7388.
  • Budowle B, Shea B, Niezgoda S, Chakraborty R. 2001. CODIS STR loci data from 41 sample populations. J Forensic Sci 46:453489.
  • Butler JM. 2011. Advanced topics in forensic DNA typing: methodology. Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
  • Byers SN, Roberts CA. 2003. Bayes' theorem in paleopathological diagnosis. Am J Phys Anthropol 121:19.
  • Byrd JE. 2008. Models and methods for osteometric sorting. In: Adams BJ, Byrd JE, editors. Recovery, analysis, and identification of commingled human remains. Totowa, NJ: Springer. p 199220.
  • Casella G, George EI. 1992. Explaining the Gibbs sampler. Am Stat 46:167174.
  • Caussinus H, Courgeau D. 2010. Estimating age without measuring it: a new method in paleodemography. Population (English edition) 65:117144.
  • Chamberlain A. 2000. Problems and prospects in paleodemography. In: Cox M, Mays S, editors. Human osteology in archaeology and forensic science. London, UK: Greenwich Medical Media. p 101115.
  • Christensen AM. 2005. Testing the reliability of frontal sinuses in positive identification. J Forensic Sci 50:1822.
  • Christensen R, Johnson WO, Branscum AJ, Hanson TE. 2011. Bayesian ideas and data analysis: an introduction for scientists and statisticians. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Clopper C, Pearson ES. 1934. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika 26:404413.
  • Courgeau D. 2010. Dispersion of measurements in demography: a historical view. Electron J Hist Probab Stat 6:119.
  • Courgeau D. 2012. Probability and social science: methodological relationships between the two approaches. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Cowles MK. 2013. Applied Bayesian statistics: with R and OpenBUGS examples. New York, NY: Springer.
  • D'Aoãut K, Vereecke EE, editors. 2011. Primate locomotion: linking field and laboratory research. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Darroch JN, Mosimann JE. 1985. Canonical and principal components of shape. Biometrika 72:241252.
  • de Clare Bronsvoort BM, von Wissmann B, Fevre EM, Handel IG, Picozzi K, Welburn SC. 2010. No gold standard estimation of the sensitivity and specificity of two molecular diagnostic protocols for Trypanosoma brucei spp. in western Kenya. PLoS One 5:e8628.
  • Diebolt J, Ip EHS. 1996. Stochastic EM: method and application. In: Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ, editors. New York: Chapman and Hall. p 259273.
  • DiGangi EA, Bethard JD, Kimmerle EH, Konigsberg LW. 2009. A new method for estimating age at death from the first rib. Am J Phys Anthropol 138:164176.
  • Dorai-Raj S. 2009. Binom: binomial confidence intervals for several parameterizations. R package version 1.0–5. URL: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=binom. Accessed October 9, 2013.
  • Engel B, Swildens B, Stegeman A, Buist W, De Jong M. 2006. Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of three conditionally dependent diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 11:360380.
  • Evett I. 1995. Avoiding the transposed conditional. Sci Justice 35:127131.
  • Evett IW, Weir BS. 1998. Interpreting DNA evidence: statistical genetics for forensic scientists. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Faerman M, Bar-Gal GK, Filon D, Greenblatt CL, Stager L, Oppenheim A, Smith P. 1998. Determining the sex of infanticide victims from the late Roman era through ancient DNA analysis. J Archaeol Sci 25:861865.
  • Ferreira M, Andrade M. 2009. A note on Dawnie Wolfe Steadman, Bradley J. Adams, and Lyle W. Konigsberg, statistical basis for positive identification in forensic anthropology. Int J Acad Res 1:2326.
  • Fisher RA. 1922. On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Phil Trans R Soc London Ser A 222:309368.
  • Foreman L, Champod C, Evett I, Lambert J, Pope S. 2003. Interpreting DNA evidence: a review. Int Stat Rev 71:473495.
  • Fürtbauer I, Heistermann M, Schülke O, Ostner J. 2013. Brief communication: female fecal androgens prior to the mating season reflect readiness to conceive in reproductively quiescent wild macaques. Am J Phys Anthropol 151:311315.
  • Gamerman D. 1997. Markov Chain Monte Carlo: stochastic simulation for bayesian inference. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall/CRC. p 1512.
  • Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. 2004. Bayesian data analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Geyer CJ. 1992. Practical Markov chain Monte Carlo. Stat Sci 7:473483.
  • Gilks WR. 1992. Derivative-free adaptive rejection sampling for Gibbs sampling. In: Bernardo JM, Berger JO, Dawid AP, Smith AFM, editors. Bayesian statistics 4. New York: Oxford University Press. p 641649.
  • Gilks WR. 1996. Full conditional distributions. In: Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ, editors. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall. p 7588.
  • Gilks WR, Best NG, Tan KKC. 1995. Adaptive rejection Metropolis sampling within Gibbs sampling. Appl Stat 44:455472.
  • Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ. 1996. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
  • Gilks WR, Wild P. 1992. Adaptive rejection sampling for Gibbs sampling. Appl Stat 41:337348.
  • Gillespie TR, Barelli C, Heistermann M. 2013. Effects of social status and stress on patterns of gastrointestinal parasitism in wild White Handed Gibbons (Hylobates lar). Am J Phys Anthropol 150:602608.
  • Gilmore CC. 2013. A comparison of antemortem tooth loss in human hunter-gatherers and non-human catarrhines: implications for the identification of behavioral evolution in the human fossil record. Am J Phys Anthropol 151:252264.
  • Goodwin W, Linacre A, Vanezis P. 1999. The use of mitochondrial DNA and short tandem repeat typing in the identification of air crash victims. Electrophoresis 20:17071711.
  • Gowland RL, Chamberlain AT. 2002. A Bayesian approach to ageing perinatal skeletal material from archaeological sites: implications for the evidence for infanticide in Roman-Britain. J Archaeol Sci 29:677685.
  • Haldane J. 1932. A note on inverse probability. Math Proc Cambridge 28:5561.
  • Hartman D, Drummer O, Eckhoff C, Scheffer J, Stringer P. 2011. The contribution of DNA to the disaster victim identification (DVI) effort. Forensic Sci Int 205:5258.
  • Hoppa RD, Vaupel JW. 2002. Paleodemography: age distribution from skeletal samples. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hui SL, Walter SD. 1980. Estimating the error rates of diagnostic tests. Biometrics 36:167171.
  • Jackson G, Black S. 2013. Use of data to inform expert evaluative opinion in the comparison of hand images—the importance of scars. Int J Legal Med (early view: 10.1007/s00414-013-0828-5).
  • Jeffreys H. 1939. Theory of probability. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
  • Jeffreys H. 1946. An invariant form for the prior probability in estimation problems. Proc R Soc London Series A Math Phys Sci 186:453461.
  • Johnson WO, Gastwirth JL, Pearson LM. 2001. Screening without a “gold standard”: the Hui-Walter paradigm revisited. Am J Epidemiol 153:921924.
  • Jones G, Johnson WO, Hanson TE, Christensen R. 2010. Identifiability of models for multiple diagnostic testing in the absence of a gold standard. Biometrics 66:855863.
  • Joseph L, Gyorkos TW, Coupal L. 1995. Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard. Am J Epidemiol 141:263272.
  • Jungers WL, Falsetti AB, Wall CE. 1995. Shape, relative size, and size-adjustments in morphometrics. Yb Phys Anthropol 38:137161.
  • Kass RE, Raftery AE. 1995. Bayes factors. J Am Stat Assoc 90:773795.
  • Katz D, Suchey JM. 1986. Age determination of the male os pubis. Am J Phys Anthropol 69:427435.
  • Kaye DH. 2009. Identification, individualization and uniqueness: what's the difference? Law Probab Risk 8:8594.
  • Kéry M. 2010. Introduction to WinBUGS for ecologists: a Bayesian approach to regression, ANOVA and related analyses. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
  • Kéry M, Schaub M. 2012. Bayesian population analysis using WinBUGS: a hierarchical perspective. New York, NY: Elsevier.
  • Koehler J, Saks M. 1991. What DNA ‘fingerprinting' can teach the law about the rest of forensic science. Cardozo Law Rev 13:361372.
  • Konigsberg L, Holman D. 1999. Estimation of age at death from dental emergence and implications for studies of prehistoric somatic growth. In: Hoppa RD, FitzGerald CM, editors. Human growth in the past: studies from bones and teeth. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. p 264289.
  • Konigsberg LW, Algee-Hewitt BFB, Steadman DW. 2009. Estimation and evidence in forensic anthropology: sex and race. Am J Phys Anthropol 139:7790.
  • Konigsberg LW, Frankenberg SR. 1992. Estimation of age structure in anthropological demography. Am J Phys Anthropol 89:235256.
  • Konigsberg LW, Hens SM, Jantz LM, Jungers WL. 1998. Stature estimation and calibration: Bayesian and maximum likelihood perspectives in physical anthropology. Yb Phys Anthropol 41:6592.
  • Konigsberg LW, Herrmann NP. 2002. Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of hazard model parameters in paleodemography. In: Hoppa RD, Vaupel JW, editors. Paleodemography: age distributions from skeletal samples. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. p 222242.
  • Konigsberg LW, Herrmann NP, Wescott DJ, Kimmerle EH. 2008. Estimation and evidence in forensic anthropology: age-at-death. J Forensic Sci 53:541557.
  • Konigsberg LW, Ross AH, Jungers WL. 2006. Estimation and evidence in forensic anthropology: stature. In: Schmitt A, Cunha E, Pinheiro J, editors. Forensic anthropology and medicine: complementary sciences from recovery to cause of death. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press. p 317331.
  • Kontanis EJ, Sledzik PS. 2008. Resolving commingling issues during the medicolegal investigation of mass fatality incidents. In: Adam BJ, Byrd JE, editors. Recovery, analysis, and identification of commingled human remains. Totowa, NJ: Springer. p 317336.
  • Kruschke J. 2010a. Doing Bayesian data analysis: a tutorial introduction with R and BUGS. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
  • Kruschke JK. 2010b. Bayesian data analysis. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci 1:658676.
  • Laval G, Excoffier L. 2004. SIMCOAL 2.0: a program to simulate genomic diversity over large recombining regions in a subdivided population with a complex history. Bioinformatics 20:24852487.
  • Lee PM. 2012. Bayesian statistics: an introduction. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
  • Lesaffre E, Lawson AB. 2012. Bayesian biostatistics. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
  • Lin T-H, Myers EW, Xing EP. 2006. Interpreting anonymous DNA samples from mass disasters—probabilistic forensic inference using genetic markers. Bioinformatics 22:e298e306.
  • Link W, Barker R. 2010. Bayesian inference with ecological applications. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
  • Lucy D. 2005. Introduction to statistics for forensic scientists. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Lunn D, Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N. 2009. The BUGS project: evolution, critique and future directions. Stat Med 28:30493067.
  • Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D. 2000. WinBUGS—a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comput 10:325337.
  • Lyman RL. 2006. Identifying bilateral pairs of deer (Odocoileus sp.) bones: how symmetrical is symmetrical enough? J Archaeol Sci 33:12561265.
  • Madrigal L. 1998. Statistics for anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Matauschek C, Roos C, Heymann EW. 2011. Mitochondrial phylogeny of tamarins (Saguinus, Hoffmannsegg 1807) with taxonomic and biogeographic implications for the S. nigricollis species group. Am J Phys Anthropol 144:564574.
  • Matsuda I, Kubo T, Tuuga A, Higashi S. 2010. A Bayesian analysis of the temporal change of local density of proboscis monkeys: implications for environmental effects on a multilevel society. Am J Phys Anthropol 142:235245.
  • Mays S, Faerman M. 2001. Sex identification in some putative infanticide victims from Roman Britain using ancient DNA. J Archaeol Sci 28:555559.
  • McGrayne SB. 2011. The theory that would not die: how Bayes' rule cracked the enigma code, hunted down Russian submarines, & emerged triumphant from two centuries of controversy. New Have, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E. 1953. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21:10871092.
  • Miao W, Gastwirth JL. 2004. The effect of dependence on confidence intervals for a population proportion. Am Stat 58:124130.
  • Millard AR, Gowland RL. 2002. A Bayesian approach to the estimation of the age of humans from tooth development and wear. Archeol Calcolatori 13:197210.
  • Montelius K, Lindblom B. 2012. DNA analysis in disaster victim identification. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 8:140147.
  • Moore DS. 1997. Bayes for beginners? Some reasons to hesitate. Am Stat 51:254261.
  • Muchlinski MN, Durham EL, Smith TD, Burrows AM. 2013. Comparative histomorphology of intrinsic vibrissa musculature among primates: implications for the evolution of sensory ecology and “face touch”. Am J Phys Anthropol 150:301312.
  • Mundorff AZ. 2008. Anthropologist-directed triage: three distinct mass fatality events involving fragmentation of human remains. In: Adams BJ, Byrd JE, editors. Recovery, analysis, and identification of commingled human remains. Totowa, NJ: Springer. p 123144.
  • National Research Council Committee on DNA Technology in Forensic Science. 1996. The evaluation of forensic DNA evidence: an update. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Neal RM. 2003. Slice sampling. Ann Stat 31:705741.
  • Nikita E, Lahr MM. 2011. Simple algorithms for the estimation of the initial number of individuals in commingled skeletal remains. Am J Phys Anthropol 146:629636.
  • Ntzoufras I. 2011. Bayesian modeling using WinBUGS. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • O'Hagan AO. 2004. Bayesian statistics: principles and benefits. In: van Boekel MA, Stein A, van Bruggen AHC, editors. Bayesian statistics and quality modelling in the agro-food production chain. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic. p 3145.
  • O'Brien M, Storlie CB. 2011. An alternative bilateral refitting model for zooarchaeological assemblages. J Taphonomy 9:245268.
  • Ousley S, Jantz R, Freid D. 2009. Understanding race and human variation: why forensic anthropologists are good at identifying race. Am J Phys Anthropol 139:6876.
  • Ousley SD, Jantz RL. 2012. Fordisc 3 and statistical methods for estimating sex and ancestry. In: Dirkmatt DC, editor. A companion to forensic anthropology. London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. p 311329.
  • Paradis E. 2012. Analysis of phylogenetics and evolution with R. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Pham-Gia T. 2000. Distributions of the ratios of independent beta variables and applications. Commun Stat A Theor 29:26932715.
  • Plummer M, Best N, Cowles K, Vines K. 2006. CODA: Convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R News 6:711.
  • Pouillot R, Gerbier G, Gardner IA. 2002. “TAGS”, a program for the evaluation of test accuracy in the absence of a gold standard. Prev Vet Med 53:6781.
  • Prinz M, Carracedo A, Mayr W, Morling N, Parsons T, Sajantila A, Scheithauer R, Schmitter H, Schneider PM. 2007. DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): recommendations regarding the role of forensic genetics for disaster victim identification (DVI). Forensic Sci Int Genetics 1:312.
  • Pritchard JK, Seielstad MT, Perez-Lezaun A, Feldman MW. 1999. Population growth of human Y chromosomes: a study of Y chromosome microsatellites. Mol Biol Evol 16:17911798.
  • R Development Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, URL http://www.R-project.org. Accessed October 9, 2013.
  • Raaum RL, Al Meeri A, Mulligan CJ. 2013. Culture modifies expectations of kinship and sex-biased dispersal patterns: a case study of patrilineality and patrilocality in tribal yemen. Am J Phys Anthropol 150:526538.
  • Raiffa H, Schlaifer R. 1961. Applied statistical decision theory. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
  • Ray N, Currat M, Foll M, Excoffier L. 2010. SPLATCHE2: a spatially explicit simulation framework for complex demography, genetic admixture and recombination. Bioinformatics 26:29932994.
  • Ray N, Excoffier L. 2009. Inferring past demography using spatially explicit population genetic models. Hum Biol 81:141157.
  • Robert CP, Cornuet J-M, Marin J-M, Pillai NS. 2011. Lack of confidence in approximate Bayesian computation model choice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:1511215117.
  • Ross AH, Konigsberg LW. 2002. New formulae for estimating stature in the Balkans. J Forensic Sci 47:165167.
  • Samaniego FJ. 2010. A comparison of the Bayesian and frequentist approaches to estimation. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Schneider PM. 2007. Scientific standards for studies in forensic genetics. Forensic Sci Int 165:238243.
  • Séguy I, Caussinus H, Courgeau D, Buchet L. 2013. Estimating the age structure of a buried adult population: a new statistical approach applied to archaeological digs in France. Am J Phys Anthropol 150:170183.
  • Sims CA. 2007. Bayesian methods in applied econometrics, or, why econometrics should always and everywhere be Bayesian. Unpublished paper available at http://sims.princeton.edu/yftp/EmetSoc607/AppliedBayes.pdf. Accessed October 9, 2013.
  • Slice DE, editor. 2005. Modern morphometrics in physical anthropology. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic / Plenum.
  • Smith C. 1986. The development of human linkage analysis. Ann Hum Genet 50:293311.
  • Sober E. 2002. Bayesianism-its scope and limits. Proc Br Acad press 113:2138.
  • Soliman AA, Abd-Ellah AH, Abou-Elheggag NA, Abd-Elmougod GA. 2012. Estimation of the parameters of life for Gompertz distribution using progressive first-failure censored data. Comput Stat Data Anal 56:24712485.
  • Stangl D. 1998. Classical and Bayesian paradigms: can we teach both? In: Pereira-Mendoza L, Kea LS, Kee TW, Wong W, editors. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. International Statistics Institute. p 251258.
  • Steadman DW, Adams BJ, Konigsberg LW. 2006. Statistical basis for positive identification in forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol 131:1526.
  • Stigler SM. 1982. Thomas Bayes's Bayesian inference. J R Stat Soc Ser A 145:250258.
  • Stigler SM. 1986. Laplace's 1774 memoir on inverse probability. Stat Sci 1:359363.
  • Sturtz S, Ligges U, Gelman AE. 2005. R2WinBUGS: a package for running WinBUGS from R. J Stat Softw 12:116.
  • Taroni F, Bozza S, Biedermann A, Garbolino P, Aitken C. 2010. Data analysis in forensic science: a Bayesian decision perspective. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
  • Tavaré S, Balding DJ, Griffiths R, Donnelly P. 1997. Inferring coalescence times from DNA sequence data. Genetics 145:505518.
  • Thomas DH. 1986. Refiguring anthropology: first principles of probability and statistics. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
  • Thompson WC. 2012. Discussion paper: hard cases make bad law—reactions to R v T. Law Probability Risk 11:347359.
  • Thompson WC, Schumann EL. 1987. Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: the prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. Law Hum Behav 11:167.
  • Tobi H, van den Berg PB, de Jong van den Berg L. 2005. Small proportions: what to report for confidence intervals? Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safety 14:239247.
  • Toft N, Jørgensen E, Højsgaard S. 2005. Diagnosing diagnostic tests: evaluating the assumptions underlying the estimation of sensitivity and specificity in the absence of a gold standard. Prev Vet Med 68:1933.
  • Tsutaya T, Yoneda M. 2013. WARN: an R package for quantitative reconstruction of weaning ages in archaeological populations using bone collagen nitrogen isotope ratios. arXiv preprint, available from http://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.2468.pdf. Accessed October 9, 2013.
  • Tummers B. 2006. DataThief III. In: http://datathief.org/, editor. Retrieved October 9, 2013. http://datathief.org/.
  • Turner BM, Van Zandt T. 2012. A tutorial on approximate Bayesian computation. J Math Psychol 56:6985.
  • Uhl NM, Rainwater CW, Konigsberg LW. 2013. Testing for size and allometric differences in fossil hominin body mass estimation. Am J Phys Anthropol 151:215229.
  • Vollset SE. 1993. Confidence intervals for a binomial proportion. Stat Med 12:809824.
  • Waldron T, Taylor GM, Rudling D. 1999. Sexing of Romano-British baby burials from the Beddingham and Bignor villas. Sussex Archaeol Collections 137:7179.
  • Wilk MB, Gnanadesikan R. 1968. Probability plotting methods for the analysis of data. Biometrika 55:117.
  • Yang M, Yang Y, Cui D, Fickenscher G, Zinner D, Roos C, Brameier M. 2012. Population genetic structure of Guizhou snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus brelichi) as inferred from mitochondrial control region sequences, and comparison with R. roxellana and R. bieti. Am J Phys Anthropol 147:110.
  • Zinner D, Wertheimer J, Liedigk R, Groeneveld LF, Roos C. 2013. Baboon phylogeny as inferred from complete mitochondrial genomes. Am J Phys Anthropol 150:133140.