Clinical and radiologic findings in a case series of maxillary sinusitis of dental origin

Authors

  • Al Pokorny MD,

    Corresponding author
    1. Spokane ENT Clinic, Spokane, WA
    2. University of Washington, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Seattle, WA
    • Correspondence to: Al Pokorny, MD, Spokane ENT Clinic, 217 W. Cataldo, Spokane, WA 99203; e-mail: apokorny@spokaneent.com

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Roderick Tataryn DDS, MS

    1. Tataryn Endodontics, Spokane, WA
    2. Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
    Search for more papers by this author

  • Potential conflict of interest: None provided.

Abstract

Background

Maxillary sinusitis of dental origin (MSDO) has been described for decades, but tends to be overlooked as a possible cause of chronic sinusitis by both clinicians and radiologists. The incidence of MSDO in published series is reported to be from 10% to 40% in bacterial sinusitis. We present this series to highlight clinical and radiologic indicators of MSDO.

Methods

Databases from the authors' otolaryngology and endodontic practices were reviewed to identify patients who had been seen mutually. Sixty-seven (67) patients were identified. Both authors then reviewed the clinical records and associated computed tomography (CT) scans and determined that 31 patients had MSDO and 2 of had bilateral MSDO, for a total of 33 cases. The clinical and radiologic features related to these cases were then tabulated.

Results

The clinical characteristics of the 33 cases of MSDO were as follows: sinus pain (88%), postnasal drainage (64%), congestion (45%), maxillary toothache (39%), and foul drainage (15%). Radiographic CT findings of MSDO showed periapical abscess in 18 cases (55%), periodontal abscess in 3 cases (9%), and no obvious dental pathology in 12 cases (36%). The extent of associated sinusitis was variable from mucoperiosteal thickening to florid unilateral sinusitis involving multiple sinuses. Eighteen maxillary sinuses (55%) were found to have either patent maxillary infundibula or prior surgical antrostomy. Twenty-four patients (77%) had unilateral maxillary sinus disease.

Conclusion

MSDO should be considered highly likely when radiographic evidence of dental pathology is associated with maxillary sinus disease. Regardless of negative CT evidence of dental pathology, MSDO should be suspected when unilateral maxillary sinus disease is seen, particularly when associated with a patent infundibulum. When MSDO is suspected, a clinical endodontic examination should be performed to rule out or treat an odontogenic etiology.

Ancillary