Potential conflict of interest: M.S. was a speaker for TEVA and MEDA on their Speakers Bureau (not related to current subject).
Does receiving an American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation Centralized Otolaryngology Research Efforts grant influence career path and scholarly impact among fellowship-trained rhinologists?
Article first published online: 18 SEP 2013
© 2013 ARS-AAOA, LLC
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
Volume 4, Issue 1, pages 85–90, January 2014
How to Cite
How to Cite this Article: Does receiving an American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation Centralized Otolaryngology Research Efforts grant influence career path and scholarly impact among fellowship-trained rhinologists? Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014;4:85–90., , , , .
- Issue published online: 2 JAN 2014
- Article first published online: 18 SEP 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 6 AUG 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 5 AUG 2013
- Manuscript Received: 13 JUL 2013
- CORE grants;
- AAO-HNSF CORE grants;
- scholarly productivity;
- academic productivity;
- faculty productivity;
- academic faculty productivity;
- rhinology faculty productivity;
- CORE grants impact;
To determine whether American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO-HNSF) Centralized Otolaryngology Research Efforts (CORE) grants influence career paths and scholarly impact of fellowship-trained rhinologists, and whether funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and CORE programs is associated with increased scholarly impact among rhinologists. Another aim was to explore whether obtaining CORE grant funding is associated with NIH award acquisition.
Practice setting, academic rank, and fellowship-training status were determined for individuals in the CORE grant database. The h-index and publication experience of practitioners was calculated using the Scopus database. Faculty listings were used to determine this data for a non-CORE-grants-funded “control” group of academic rhinologists. Active and past NIH funding was obtained using the NIH RePORTER database.
Fifteen of 26 (57.7%) fellowship-trained rhinologists receiving CORE grants were funded for rhinologic projects. Five of 6 rhinologists receiving NIH funding had a CORE-grants-funding history. Twenty-two of 26 (84.6%) rhinologists receiving CORE funding are currently in academic practice. Academic rhinologists receiving CORE or NIH funding had higher h-indices, a result reaching significance among promoted faculty and those with greater than 10 years of publication experience.
Encouraging the pursuit of CORE grants among junior faculty as well as trainees interested in rhinology may be a strategy for developing highly effective research habits that pay dividends after the first few years of one's career. Fellowship-trained rhinologists with a CORE funding history predominantly pursue careers in academic medicine, although their CORE projects are not necessarily related to rhinologic topics.