Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.
Brief Communication
Cerebrospinal fluid of brain trauma patients inhibits in vitro neuronal network function via NMDA receptors†
Article first published online: 20 JUL 2009
DOI: 10.1002/ana.21808
Copyright © 2009 American Neurological Association
Additional Information
How to Cite
Otto, F., Illes, S., Opatz, J., Laryea, M., Theiss, S., Hartung, H.-P., Schnitzler, A., Siebler, M. and Dihné, M. (2009), Cerebrospinal fluid of brain trauma patients inhibits in vitro neuronal network function via NMDA receptors. Annals of Neurology, 66: 546–555. doi: 10.1002/ana.21808
- †
Publication History
- Issue published online: 8 OCT 2009
- Article first published online: 20 JUL 2009
- Accepted manuscript online: 20 JUL 2009 12:00AM EST
- Manuscript Received: 17 SEP 2009
- Manuscript Accepted: 10 JUL 2009
- Manuscript Revised: 1 JUL 2009
Funded by
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. Grant Number: BMBF, 01GN0503
- Christiane & Claudia Hempel-Stiftung für Klinische Stammzellforschung
- Hannelore-Kohl-Stiftung ZNS
- Forschungskommission der medizinischen Fakultät der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Neurological diseases frequently induce pathological changes of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that might secondarily influence brain activity, as the CSF–brain barrier is partially permeable. However, functional effects of CSF on neuronal network activity have not been specified to date. Here, we report that CSF specimens from patients with reduced Glasgow Coma Scale values caused by severe traumatic brain injury suppress synchronous activity of in vitro-generated neuronal networks in comparison with controls. We present evidence that underlying mechanisms include increased N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activity mediated by a CSF fraction containing elevated amino acid concentrations. These proof-of-principle data suggest that determining effects of CSF specimens on neuronal network activity might be of diagnostic value. Ann Neurol 2009;66:546–555

1531-8249/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=d36d5ebb3caa1b29d7f078a97c52973b0963daf2)
1531-8249/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=078041b213f6959d63575a593f880457c45116f0)
1531-8249/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=685ec69724c5ed4c8847ce939e70ceb45065856f)