Support from MINECO (CTQ2010–21497 and PRI-PIBIN-2011-1278), an FPU grant to I.L., and a Torres Quevedo contract to S.M. are gratefully acknowledged. Support has also been received from the Cluster of Excellence (UniCat) and the US Department of Energy (DOE) (Grant DE-SC0001423 to V.S.B.). M.Z.E. received funding from a Computational Materials and Chemical Sciences (CMCSN) project at Brookhaven National Laboratory under contract DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the US DOE and was supported by its Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences. C.J.C. acknowledges support from the US National Science Foundation (CHE-0952054).
A Self-Improved Water-Oxidation Catalyst: Is One Site Really Enough?†
Article first published online: 20 NOV 2013
Copyright © 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Volume 126, Issue 1, pages 209–213, January 3, 2014
How to Cite
López, I., Ertem, M. Z., Maji, S., Benet-Buchholz, J., Keidel, A., Kuhlmann, U., Hildebrandt, P., Cramer, C. J., Batista, V. S. and Llobet, A. (2014), A Self-Improved Water-Oxidation Catalyst: Is One Site Really Enough?. Angew. Chem., 126: 209–213. doi: 10.1002/ange.201307509
- Issue published online: 23 DEC 2013
- Article first published online: 20 NOV 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 25 OCT 2013
- Manuscript Received: 26 AUG 2013
- MINECO. Grant Numbers: CTQ2010–21497, PRI-PIBIN-2011-1278
- US Department of Energy (DOE). Grant Numbers: DE-SC0001423, DE-AC02-98CH10886, CHE-0952054
- 2cB. Patel, B. Tamburic, F. W. Zemichael, P. Dechatiwongse, K. Hellgardt, ISRN Renewable Energy 2012, 2012, 14.
- 3Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry II, Coordination and Organometallic Chemistry, Vol. 8 (Ed.: W. W. Y. Vivian), Elsevier Limited, Oxford, 2012., , , , in
- 12dCatalysis by Metal Complexes, Vol. 34 (Eds.: C. Bianchini, D. J. Cole-Hamilton, P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen), Springer, Heidelberg, 2011.in
- 15The TOFs were calculated by transforming the current intensity at 1.6 V vs. SSCE into mols of oxygen produced per second: I/(4 electrons×96485), and dividing this value by the amount of catalyst next to the electrode surface, which was determined on the basis of the area under the anodic wave of the IV,IV/III,III couple in the case of 14+ or the III/II couple in the case of 42+.