We thank the CNRS and Rhodia Co. for financial support.
Trifluoroacetamides from Amino Alcohols as Nucleophilic Trifluoromethylating Reagents†
Article first published online: 10 JUL 2003
Copyright © 2003 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Volume 42, Issue 27, pages 3133–3136, July 14, 2003
How to Cite
Joubert, J., Roussel, S., Christophe, C., Billard, T., Langlois, B. R. and Vidal, T. (2003), Trifluoroacetamides from Amino Alcohols as Nucleophilic Trifluoromethylating Reagents. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 42: 3133–3136. doi: 10.1002/anie.200351301
- Issue published online: 10 JUL 2003
- Article first published online: 10 JUL 2003
- Manuscript Received: 28 FEB 2003
- amino alcohols;
- nucleophilic addition;
Fluorinated compounds exhibit unique properties,1 which are of huge interest in a wide range of applications.2 Consequently, the number of new organofluorine products that appear each year is growing steadily.3 Trifluoromethyl-substituted compounds constitute a particular class with specific properties, such as the high lipophilicity provided by this group. Thus, such molecules find pharmaceutical applications,2 as illustrated by two drugs recently introduced for the treatment of human diseases, efavirenz4 (anti-HIV) and celecoxib5 (antiarthritic).
In the last two decades, many reliable methods have been reported for the introduction of a CF3 group into organic compounds,6 and in recent years, anionic trifluoromethylation has emerged as one of the most powerful strategies. However, these anionic methods suffer from the limited availability of efficient reagents that are able to overcome the high instability of the CF3 anion, which is known to decompose rapidly and almost irreversibly into a fluoride anion and difluorocarbene.
The most popular reagent for these anionic methods is currently (trifluoromethyl)trimethylsilane (CF3SiMe3, Ruppert–Prakash reagent), which is both very powerful for synthetic applications and commercially available.7 However, its preparation from CF3Br, the industrial production of which is now restricted for ecological reasons,8 constitutes a drawback for large-scale applications.
In our quest for new trifluoromethylating reagents, we have recently shown that some hemiaminals of trifluoroacetaldehyde are useful tools for the nucleophilic trifluoromethylation of non-enolizable carbonyl compounds.9 More recently, we demonstrated that trifluoroacetamides,10a trifluoromethanesulfinamides,10b and α,α,α-trifluoroacetophenone10c also behave as efficient trifluoromethylating reagents under the action of potassium tert-butoxide (Scheme 1).
Although trifluoroacetic acid derivatives are economically and ecologically friendly trifluoromethylating agents, the presence of a strong base in these reactions precludes the use of enolizable substrates. To circumvent this drawback, we envisaged a strategy in which slow delivery of the alcoholate would favor nucleophilic attack over deprotonation by this species. This led us to study the reactivity of trifluoroacetamides derived from O-silylated vic-amino alcohols. These compounds were easily prepared from commercially available amino alcohols (Scheme 2).
A variety of reagents were synthesized by this procedure, as shown in Scheme 3 (overall yields are given for the purified compounds). To access their potential as trifluoromethylating reagents, 1 a–f were desilylated with CsF in 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME), according to the method used in our previous studies.9a–b As models for different types of carbonyl electrophiles, we chose benzophenone (for non-enolizable substrates), benzaldehyde (for aldehyde substrates), and acetophenone (for enolizable substrates). The results are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1 shows that the substitution at the nitrogen atom did not greatly influence the ability of these new reagents to transfer their CF3 group (entries 1–5). In contrast, the influence of substituents R1 and R2 was more important. Indeed, when no substituent was present (R1=R2=H), or when only one substituent was present, and in the α position relative to the oxygen atom, trifluoromethylation occurred under heating at 80 °C (Table 1, entries 3, 5, and 7). However, when a substituent was present in the α position relative to the nitrogen atom (and R1=H), no CF3 transfer was observed, and instead migration of the trifluoroacetyl group from the nitrogen atom to the oxygen atom occurred (Scheme 4). On the other hand, when both adjacent carbon centers were substituted, as in the case of 1 f, trifluoromethylation proceeded even at room temperature (Table 1, entries 8–10).
Thus, this new family of reagents allowed the trifluoromethylation of both non-enolizable and enolizable carbonyl compounds. Compound 1 f, derived from cheap and commercially available ephedrine, was the best candidate, as it promoted the formation of the desired products in good yields even at room temperature. Furthermore, 1 f is a stable white solid that can be stored for long periods of time, whereas 1 a–c have a shelf life of less than 48 h. The long reaction time of 1 f with acetophenone led us to use soluble tetrabutylammonium triphenyldifluorosilicate (TBAT)11 in THF instead of CsF in DME as the desilylating agent. With this reagent a 60 % yield of 2 c was observed after 6 h, in contrast to the 5 days required with CsF/DME (Table 1, entry 10).
The mechanism shown in Scheme 5 could be proposed, by analogy with previous work.7a, 9a This proposal was supported by the isolation and characterization of oxazolidinones 4 from the reaction. Nevertheless, studies to better understand the role of the various substituents are in progress in our laboratory.
From these preliminary results with simple substrates, compound 1 f appeared to be the most powerful trifluoromethylating reagent of those studied. Consequently, its reactivity toward diverse carbonyl compounds was examined (Scheme 6).
Thus, a wide range of non-enolizable and enolizable carbonyl compounds (aldehydes, ketones, α,β-unsaturated ketones) were trifluoromethylated with 1 f in satisfactory yields. Although 1 f is a chiral reagent, it did not induce any chirality in the trifluoromethylation of prochiral carbonyl substrates. No enantiomeric excess was observed for any of the products.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that trifluoroacetamides derived from O-silylated vic-amino alcohols constitute a new class of nucleophilic trifluoromethylating reagents. The trifluoroacetamide derived from ephedrine is especially promising, as it trifluoromethylates both enolizable and non-enolizable carbonyl compounds in satisfying yields under mild conditions. To our knowledge, this is the first reagent that is likely to provide competition for the Ruppert–Prakash reagent. Our new challenge is to design similar reagents for enantioselective trifluoromethylation. These studies are in progress in our laboratory.
Typical procedure: 1 f: A flame-dried three-necked vessel was successively charged with ephedrine (6.6 g, 40 mmol) and dichloromethane (40 mL) under nitrogen. The resulting mixture was cooled to 0 °C, then N-(trimethylsilyl)imidazole (6 mL, 41 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 40 min, then warmed to room temperature and stirred for a further 2 h. After this period, diisopropylethylamine (7.2 mL, 41.4 mmol) was added and the mixture was cooled again to 0 °C. A solution of trifluoroacetic anhydride (5.6 mL, 40 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (16 mL) was then added dropwise over 1.5 h, after which the mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 10 min, then at room temperature for 4 h. The reaction mixture was then washed with 6 % aqueous NaHCO3 and the organic phase was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by chromatography over silica gel.
Typical trifluoromethylation procedure: A solution of tetrabutylammonium triphenyldifluorosilicate (TBAT; 54 mg, 0.1 equiv) in THF (0.5 mL) was added dropwise over 15 min to a stirred solution of 1 f (1 mmol) and the electrophile (1 mmol) in THF (1 mL). After 6 h, the crude product was desilylated by treatment with TBAF (1 M in THF, 1 mL) for 1 h, then the mixture was extracted with pentane and brine. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent was evaporated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography over silica gel.
In memory of Odile Miani
- 1a“Organo-Fluorine Compounds”: U. Groß, S. Rüdiger, Methods Org. Chem. (Houben-Weyl) 4th ed. 1952–, Vol. E10a, pp. 18–26;
- 2aOrganofluorine Compounds in Medicinal Chemistry and Biomedical Applications, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993;, , ,
- 2bOrganofluorine Chemistry: Principles and Commercial Applications, Plenum, New York, 1994;, , ,
- 2cFluorine in Bioorganic Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 1991;, ,
- 2dFluorine-containing Amino Acids. Synthesis and Properties (Eds.: V. P. Kukhar, V. A. Soloshonok), Wiley, Chichester, 1995;
- 2eOrganofluorine Compounds: Chemistry and Properties, Springer, Berlin, 2000, chap. 5, pp. 137–182;,
- 2fInventory of Industrial Fluoro-Biochemicals, Eyrolles, Paris, 1996.,
- 8aChemistry of Organic Fluorine Compounds II. A Critical Review, ACS Monograph 187, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1995, pp. 1092–1100;, ,
- 10aSynlett 2003, 2, 230–232;, , , ,
- 10bSynlett 2003, 2, 233–235;, , , ,
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://www.wiley-vch.de/contents/jc_2002/2003/z51301_s.pdf or from the author.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.