This study was financed by the Austrian Science Fund within the DK Molecular Enzymology (FWF, project W9), the BMWFJ, BMVIT, SFG, Standortagentur Tirol, and ZIT through the COMET-Program. F.H. and B.v.L. were supported by the BBSRC and F.H. as an ERC Starting Investigator. The authors would like to thank Barbara Grischek, Sebastian Grimm, Gerald Rechberger, and Nina Schmidt for their valuable assistance.
One-Pot Deracemization of sec-Alcohols: Enantioconvergent Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Alkyl Sulfates Using Stereocomplementary Sulfatases†
Article first published online: 10 FEB 2013
Copyright © 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Volume 52, Issue 11, pages 3277–3279, March 11, 2013
How to Cite
Schober, M., Toesch, M., Knaus, T., Strohmeier, G. A., van Loo, B., Fuchs, M., Hollfelder, F., Macheroux, P. and Faber, K. (2013), One-Pot Deracemization of sec-Alcohols: Enantioconvergent Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Alkyl Sulfates Using Stereocomplementary Sulfatases. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 52: 3277–3279. doi: 10.1002/anie.201209946
- Issue published online: 7 MAR 2013
- Article first published online: 10 FEB 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 12 JAN 2013
- Manuscript Received: 12 DEC 2012
- Funded Access
- Austrian Science Fund
- Standortagentur Tirol
- enzyme catalysis;
- kinetic resolution;
- synthetic methods
Given the fact that the theoretically possible number of racemates is larger than that of symmetric prochiral or meso compounds,1 the development of deracemization methods, which yield a single stereoisomer from a racemate is an important topic.1–3 Enantioconvergent processes are based on the transformation of a pair of enantiomers through opposite stereochemical pathways affecting retention and inversion of configuration. Depending on the stereochemical course of enzymatic and chemical reactions, three types of deracemization protocols were recently classified by Feringa et al.4 Two chemoenzymatic methods start with a biocatalytic kinetic resolution step, which yields a hetero- or homochiral 1:1 mixture of the formed product and nonconverted substrate enantiomer. The latter is subjected to a second (non-enzymatic) transformation with retention or inversion of configuration to yield a single stereoisomeric product. Although several one-pot, two-step protocols have been successfully demonstrated,5, 10c,d they typically rely on activated species, such as sulfonates,5a–d nitrate esters,5b or Mitsunobu intermediates,5e and negatively affect the overall atom economy of the process. The most elegant method relies on one (or two) enzyme(s), which mediate the transformation of both enantiomers through stereocomplementary pathways by retention and inversion. Since the requirements of such double selectivities are very difficult to meet, successful examples are rare: This approach has been applied to the hydrolysis of epoxides using two epoxide hydrolases showing opposite enantiopreference6 or a single enzyme that catalyzes the enantioconvergent hydrolysis of enantiomers with opposite regioselectivity.7
For enzymes, the ability to act by retention or inversion is a rare feature, which has been found among epoxide hydrolases,8 dehalogenases,4, 9 and sulfatases.10 The latter catalyze the hydrolytic cleavage of (alkyl) sulfate esters by breakage of the SO or the CO bond leading to retention or inversion at the chiral carbon atom,10b and thus makes them prime candidates for enantioconvergent processes. So far, only a single inverting sec-alkylsulfatase (PISA1) was generated recombinantly and characterized biochemically,11 thus allowing preparative-scale applications.10c In combination with acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of the nonreacted substrate enantiomer under retention of configuration12 a chemoenzymatic two-step deracemization protocol for sec-alcohols was recently developed.10c,d However, the method suffers from serious limitations because it requires undesirably large volumes organic solvents and several molar equivalents of a strong acid (typically 2–7 equiv of p-TosOH), which pose the risk of racemization or decomposition to the functionalized substrates, especially when elevated temperatures are required for acidic hydrolysis. Moreover, it is not applicable to retaining sulfatases, because no chemical method for sulfate ester hydrolysis with inversion exists.10c
So far, retaining-sulfatase activity was reported in whole cells of Rhodopirellula baltica DSM 10527,13 but the corresponding enzymes could not be identified, thus impeding the use of recombinant technology to make the enzyme available for biocatalysis. Furthermore, the retaining sulfatase of Rh. baltica would not be suitable for an enantioconvergent process with PISA1, because both proteins exhibit the same enantiopreference. During our search for a retaining sec-alkylsulfatase with an enantiopreference opposite to that of PISA1, we discovered that the arylsulfatase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PAS) exhibited activity on sec-alkylsulfates. PAS, which has been characterized on a molecular level,14 showed promiscuous activity on various arylic phosphates and phosphonates.15 On its standard model substrate (4-nitrophenyl sulfate), PAS exhibited a rate acceleration of kcat/kuncat 2.3×1010,16 and for a less reactive substrate the highest rate enhancement (kcat/kuncat=2×1026) of any catalytic reaction known so far has been measured.17 The stereochemical features of PAS were investigated using a series of sec-alkylsulfate esters (rac-1 a–7 a; Table 1). The substrates 1 a–3 a bearing an acetylenic moiety on the long chain adjacent to the stereocenter were resolved with good to excellent enantioselectivities (E 59 to >200). Undesired non-enzymatic background hydrolysis of 1 a could be suppressed by addition of 20 % (v/v) of DMSO as a cosolvent.18 In contrast, the selectivities were largely lost when the acetylenic moiety was moved to the short chain (substrates 4 a–6 a). The alkyl aryl derivative 7 a gave again an excellent E value of greater than 200. All substrates converted with high enantioselectivities (1 a–3 a, 7 a) were hydrolyzed with complete retention of configuration, thus yielding S-configured alcohols and unreacted R-configured sulfate esters. To prove the stereochemical course of sulfate ester hydrolysis by PAS, enzymatic cleavage of rac-1-octyn-3-yl sulfate (6 a) was performed in an 18O-labeled buffer (label >98 %). GC/MS analysis of the alcohol 6 b formed revealed that (in contrast to inverting sec-alkylsulfatases10c) no incorporation of 18O occurred, and is consistent with the attack of the enzyme’s formylglycine nucleophile on sulfur. Hydrolysis of enantiopure (S)-6 a by PAS yielded alcohol (S)-6 b in greater than 99 % ee, thus proving that hydrolysis proceeded under strict retention of configuration.
|Substrate||Enzyme||t [h]||Conv. [%][a]||eeP [%]||eeS [%]||E value[a]|
|rac-1 a[b]||PAS||24||49||97 (S)||92 (R)||190 (S)|
|rac-2 a||PAS||24||49||91 (S)||89 (R)||59 (S)|
|rac-3 a||PAS||6||46||98 (S)||84 (R)||>200 (S)|
|rac-4 a[c||PAS||6||61||48 (S)||74 (R)||6 (S)|
|rac-5 a[c]||PAS||6||53||11 (S)||11 (R)||<2 (S)|
|rac-6 a[c]||PAS||6||65||22 (R)||40 (S)||≈2 (R)|
|rac-7 a||PAS||48||30||>99 (S)||46 (R)||>200 (S)|
|rac-1 a[b,d]||PISA1||6||47||98 (S)||89 (S)||>200 (S)|
|rac-2 a[d]||PISA1||4||56||55 (S)||80 (S)||8 (S)|
|rac-3 a[d]||PISA1||6||57||32 (S)||40 (S)||≈3 (S)|
|rac-4 a[c]||PISA1||72||50||>99 (R)||>99 (R)||>200 (R)|
|rac-5 a[c,e]||PISA1||24||50||>99 (R)||>99 (R)||>200 (R)|
|rac-6 a[c,d]||PISA1||24||50||>99 (R)||>99 (R)||>200 (R)|
|rac-7 a||PISA1||72||49||>99 (S)||93 (S)||>200 (S)|
Since the stereochemical features of PAS—R enantiopreference with retention—would ideally complement the S preference with inversion10c,d of PISA1,10e we optimized the enzymatic hydrolysis of the substrates 1 a–7 a with the latter enzyme (Table 1). Most of the substrates (1 a, 4 a–7 a) showed perfect E values of greater than 200, with only 2 a and 3 a giving insufficient selectivities. The data thus obtained enabled us to develop three types of enantioconvergent processes (Scheme 1, Table 2):
|Substrate||Reaction Type||tPISA1 [h]||tPAS [h]||Conv. [%]||eeP [%]|
|rac-1 a||C||24||24||93||93 (S)|
|rac-1 a[a]||C||24||24||98||95 (S)|
|rac-1 a[a,b]||C||24||24||93||98 (S)|
|rac-2 a||A||12||36||81||91 (S)|
|rac-3 a||A||6||18||>99||97 (S)|
|rac-4 a||B||72||24||>99||94 (R)|
|rac-5 a||B||48||24||>99||>99 (R)|
|rac-6 a||B||48||24||97||>99 (R)|
|rac-7 a||C||72||72||80||>99 (S)|
- •Type A. The substrates rac-2 a and rac-3 a, where PAS was highly enantioselective, could be deracemized by a one-pot, two-step sequence using retaining PAS first, followed by non-enantioselective inverting hydrolysis with PISA1 to yield (S)-2 b and (S)-3 b in 91 and 97 % ee, respectively.
- •Type B. For rac-4 a–6 a, where PISA1 was highly enantioselective, but PAS was not, the opposite order of events—PISA1 first, PAS second—was successful and yielded the corresponding R-configured alcohols 4 b–6 b in 94 to greater than 99 % ee
- •Type C. The ideal single-step process using both enzymes simultaneously was designed for the substrates rac-1 a and rac-7 a. To maximize the ee value of 1 b, DMSO was used as cosolvent to suppress background hydrolysis which increased the ee value of (S)-1 b from 93 to 98 % ee. To demonstrate the applicability of this method on a preparative scale, the deracemization of rac-6 a was scaled-up (1 g, 4.4 mmol), and gave (R)-6 b as the sole product in 82 % yield upon isolation with 98 % ee.
The choice of which process (Type A–C) is most suitable for the deracemization of a given substrate depends on the availability of an enantioselective sec-alkylsulfatase acting with retention or inversion of configuration. Processes of Types A and B are feasible with a single enantioselective enzyme, whereas Type C requires two enantioselective sulfatases with matching opposite enantiopreference. It should be kept in mind that Types A and B constitute kinetic resolutions,19 whereas Type C represents a parallel kinetic resolution.20
Overall, the purely enzymatic protocol excels by its significantly broader applicability compared to the chemoenzymatic procedure10c,d for the following reasons: 1) it eliminates the harsh reaction conditions required for acid-catalyzed hydrolysis, which are incompatible with sensitive functional groups and 2) it is also applicable to retaining sulfatases (such as PAS).
In summary, the one-pot deracemization of sec-alcohols bearing various functional groups was achieved by enantioconvergent hydrolysis of the corresponding sulfate esters using the retaining aryl sulfatase PAS and the inverting alkyl sulfatase PISA1, which possess the required opposite enantiopreference.
Preparative scale one-pot, one-step deracemization of rac-6 a: Purified PISA1 (0.5 mL, 13 mg, 176.5 nmol, 0.5 mL of stock solution) was added to 1-octyn-3-yl sulfate (rac-6 a, 1 g, 4.4 mmol) dissolved in Tris-HCl (197.5 mL, 100 mM, pH 8.0). The reaction was shaken at 120 rpm and 30 °C for 24 h. PAS (N-terminal strep tag, 2 mL, 26 mg, 434 nmol) was added. After an additional 24 h, the aqueous phase was extracted with tBuOMe (3×100 mL). The combined organic phases were dried with anhydrous Na2SO4 and filtered. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure (220 mbar, 30 °C) and (R)-6 b was obtained as a clear yellow oil (0.45 g, 3.6 mmol, 82 %) with the following physical properties: ee value 98 % [determined via GC as (R)-1-octyn-3-yl acetate]; +4.6° (CHCl3, c=1.0); lit.21 +5.3° (CHCl3, c=1.0); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ=4.39 (dt, 29.0 and 9.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.48 (d, 5.2 Hz, 1 H), 1.80–1.67 (m, 2 H), 1.53–1.25 (m, 6 H), 0.92 ppm (t, 6.1 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ=85.0, 72.8, 62.3, 37.6, 31.4, 24.7, 22.5, 14.0 ppm.
- 3For a conceptually different approach for the cyclic deracemization of amines, see Ref. [2b].
- 10eDepending on CIP priorities, the preference may be formally switched for certain substrates.
- 18The cosolvent has no significant influence on the pH value and does not hamper the workup procedure, but reduces the water activity (aW) of the system, thereby impeding spontaneous (non-enzymatic) hydrolysis.
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.