SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • Sts 5;
  • Sts 14;
  • Australopithecus africanus;
  • development;
  • age-at-death;
  • Sterkfontein

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. CONCLUSIONS
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. LITERATURE CITED

During the 1947 fieldwork season, Member 4 (2-3 My) of the South African Sterkfontein site yielded two important Australopithecus africanus fossils: a cranium popularly nicknamed “Mrs. Ples” (Sts 5), and a partial skeleton (Sts 14). Previous reports have proposed that Sts 5 was a nonfully grown adolescent individual (Thackeray et al., S Afr J Sci 2002a;98:21–22), and that Sts 14 was a sub-adult specimen (according to various signs of immaturity in the skeleton) (Berge and Gommery, C R Acad Sci Paris, Sciences de la terre et des planètes 1999;329:227–232; Häusler and Berger, J Hum Evol, 2001;40:411–417; Thackeray et al., S Afr J Sci, 2002b;98:211–212). It was subsequently proposed that these fossils actually belonged to the same individual (Thackeray et al., S Afr J Sci, 2002b;98:211–212), a proposition supported by their spatial positions within the site. The present work attempts to revise these different assertions. The results obtained: (i) show that the Sts 5 fossil represents a fully grown adult cranium; (ii) provide new evidence of immaturity in the Sts 14 skeletal elements (sustaining the proposed young adult age of this specimen), and (iii) suggest that although the revised ages-at-death for these fossils are partially compatible, there is no evidence to support the idea that they represent a single individual. Finally, the encephalization quotient associated with a hypothetical union of Sts 5 and Sts 14 (calculated using data from both specimens) lies between the upper and lower limits of the currently estimated range for this species and H. habilis, respectively. Anat Rec, 2008. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.


INTRODUCTION

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. CONCLUSIONS
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. LITERATURE CITED

The Sterkfontein site lies in northeastern South Africa, 10 km NNW of Krugersdorp in the Gauteng province (Fig. 1a). Located within a complex endokarstic system formed by the dissolution of Precambrian dolomite limestone along bedding planes and vertical joints via the action of weakly acidic groundwater (Kuman and Clarke, 2000, p. 829), the cavities at the site became filled with calcareous bone-bearing breccia. As a consequence of its land-use history and the repeated collapse-fill sequences involved in its genesis, great efforts were required to ascertain the spatial and temporal sequences of the site (see Brain, 1957, 1958; Robinson, 1962; Robinson and Manson, 1962; Howell, 1967; Tobias and Hughes, 1969; Wilkinson, 1973, 1983; Partridge, 1978; Stiles and Partridge, 1979; Tobias, 1979; Clarke, 1985, 1994; Partridge and Watt, 1991; Kuman and Clarke, 2000). Six lithostratigraphic members were originally identified (Partridge, 1978; Partridge and Watt, 1991), numbered 1 to 6 (oldest to youngest). Post Member 6, the Stw 53 Infill and the Oldowan Infill were described at a later date (Kuman and Clarke, 2000).

thumbnail image

Figure 1. (a) Location of the Sterkfontein site (modified from Partridge et al., 1999) where the (b) Sts 5 cranium and (c) Sts 14 partial skeleton were discovered. Scale bar = 2 cm.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Since 1936 about 500 hominid fossil specimens have been recovered from this site (Partridge et al., 2003), the bulk coming from Member 4 (MNI = 87 individuals; Pickering et al., 2004). Among the most famous of these fossils are the cranium Sts 5 (commonly known as “Mrs. Ples”; Fig. 1b) and the partial skeleton Sts 14 (Fig. 1c). Both specimens were discovered during the 1947 fieldwork season within the same lithostratigraphic unit (Member 4C). After having originally been attributed to different species, by the early 1950s the entire Sterkfontein collection (Member 4) was commonly assigned to Australopithecus africanus (Schwartz and Tattersall, 2005).

Member 4 broadly corresponds to the Type Site but its geological age has been widely debated. According to Clark (2002), the stratigraphic position and the archaeological and palaeontological content of Member 4 indicate it to encompass the age interval of 2–3 My. Partridge (2005) proposed an age for the Sts 5 cranium of between 2.14 and 2.15 My.

According to the original description of Sts 5 by Broom et al. (1950), the degree of closure of the cranial sutures is in agreement with an individual who was “no longer young” (Broom et al., 1950, p. 14). However, Thackeray et al. (2002a) later identified immature traits in the dentition. In particular (thanks to the use of high-quality CT scan techniques) they indicated that the apical ends of the roots of the right third molar (RM3) were not fully closed. Similarly, Sts 14 was also originally considered to represent an adult (Robinson, 1972), but again, subsequent studies revealed signs of immaturity in the iliac crest, the ischial tuberosity, the pubic spine, the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), the synchondrosis between the first and the second sacral vertebrae, and the epiphyseal plate of the sacro-iliac joint (Berge and Gommery, 1999; Häusler and Berger, 2001; Thackeray et al., 2002b). All these latter studies consider Sts 14 to be a subadult individual. In particular, Berge and Gommery (1999) established its owner's age-at-death to be little more than 12 years from the ossification stage of the sacrum. On the basis of their very similar developmental stages and matching sex attributions, Thackeray et al. (2002b) and Gommery and Thackeray (2006) proposed that Sts 5 and Sts 14 might belong to the same individual, a gravitational slump explaining their relative spatial positions within the site.

The aim of this study was to reassess the developmental stage and the biological and chronological ages-at-death of the Sterkfontein Sts 5 and Sts 14 fossils, using developmental information for chimpanzees and extant humans. The results were then used to test whether these specimens are developmentally compatible, and therefore might represent a single individual. Finally, the consistency of the encephalization quotient (EQ) of this hypothetical individual with that currently estimated for A. africanus was investigated. To date, no other Australopithecus skeletons recovered have been well enough preserved to make an accurate assessment of this key aspect of the biology of extinct hominins.

Development of Australopithecus africanus

Numerous studies have addressed the maturation pattern and growth rate of the extinct species A. africanus, focusing mainly on the calcification and incremental histological patterns of the dentition and the sequence of tooth emergence and facial growth, but also on the development of the postcranial skeleton. Although some authors (Mann, 1975, 1988; Mann et al., 1987, 1990; Lampl et al., 1993) have supported the idea that the developmental pattern for South African Australopithecus is essentially human-like, it is currently widely accepted that the pattern and timing of postnatal maturation in this species is essentially ape-like (Bromage, 1985, 1986, 1987; Bromage and Dean, 1985; Beynon, 1986; Smith, 1986, 1987, 2004; Conroy and Vannier, 1987, 1988, 1991; Beynon and Wood, 1987; Dean, 1987a, b, 1988, 2000; Beynon and Dean, 1988; Berge, 1998; Dean et al., 2001; Anemone, 2002).

Relative Maturation of the Cranial and Postcranial Systems

Sts 5 is edentulous; only indirect information on the length of the roots can be gleaned from the depths of the alveoli (see later). Therefore, to test the consistency between Sts 5 cranial and Sts 14 postcranial development, skeletal traits were examined. In particular, by taking into account the preservation of these specimens and making use of information in the literature, the slightly earlier closure of the spheno-occipital synchondrosis (SOS) relative to the ossification of the epiphysis of the iliac crest was confirmed (Stewart, 1934; Zilhman, 2007). However, the time span between these maturational events is quite small and reversals of this sequence are not uncommon in modern human populations (Stewart, 1934). Therefore, it was considered that both events take place at roughly the same time, and that small advances or delays of one relative to the other are within the normal range of variation. These advances/delays occur because certain sets of bones are more sensitive to factors affecting skeletal development (see Tanner, 1962), causing some degree of variability in the ossification sequence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. CONCLUSIONS
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. LITERATURE CITED

The Sts 5 specimen is a near complete cranium with some parts of the cranial vault and the dentition missing (Fig. 1b). Sts 14, on the other hand, is a partial skeleton composed of six lumbar (Sts 14a, Sts 14b, Sts 14c, Sts 14d, Sts 14e, Sts 14f, caudo-cranially oriented) and nine thoracic (Sts 14g, Sts 14h, Sts 14i, Sts 14k, Sts 14l, Sts 14m, Sts 14n, Sts 14o, Sts 14p, caudo-cranially oriented) vertebrae (in different states of preservation), several rib fragments (MNE = 9, Pickering et al., 2004), both innominate bones (Sts 14r, Sts 14s; quite complete in their preservation), a partial sacrum (Sts 14q), and the proximal half of the left femur (Sts 14t) (Robinson, 1972) (Fig. 1c).

Data were collected from the Sts 5 and Sts 14 original fossils housed in the Transvaal Museum in Pretoria. Morphological descriptions, photographs of these specimens, and a high-resolution computer tomography (CT) (0.2-mm slice thickness, 120 kV, 299 mA, 512 × 512 matrix, 0.152 mm pixel size) scan of Sts 5 (conducted at the Little Company of Mary Hospital, Pretoria) were made. A commercial tomography scan of Sts 5 (Weber et al., 1997a) was also used as a data source.

The comparative sample was composed of a set of CT scans from nine specimens of Pan troglodytes from Equatorial Guinea but of unknown age-at-death (all held at the Estación Biológica de Doñana [EBD], Spain) (0.5 mm slice thickness, 170–160 kV, 4.0–3.75 mA, 1024 × 1024 matrix, 0.217–0.253–0.289 mm pixel sizes) (Table 1). The original specimen of the partial adult cranium Sts 71 (A. africanus) from Sterkfontein, held at the Transvaal Museum in Pretoria, was also examined. A commercial CT scan of this specimen (Weber et al., 1997b) was also used as an information source. The comparative sample was completed with information from the literature on the pattern and schedule of development of the traits studied in chimpanzees and modern humans. The reason for including extant humans was the incomplete data regarding the maturation of certain features in the chimpanzee essays. Tables 2 and 3 show most of the information used, pertaining to chimpanzees and humans. The patterns and timing of closure of the cranial sutures were obtained from Krogman (1930), Schultz (1940) and Ashley-Montagu (1935, 1937 in Chopra, 1957) for chimpanzees, and from Todd and Lyon (1924, 1925a, b, c), Krogman (1939), Wood Jones (1946 in Chopra, 1957), Abbie (1950 in Chopra, 1957), Singer (1953 in Chopra, 1957), Acsádi and Nemeskéri (1970), Meindl and Lovejoy (1985), Mann et al. (1991), Gruspier and Mullen (1991) and Key et al. (1994) for humans.

Table 1. Developmental stages of the cranial features of the chimpanzee sample (EBD)
SampleDental emergenceaTooth calcificationbSpheno-occipital synchondrosiscPetro-exoccipital synchondrosisdSphenoidal sinuse
  • EBD, Estación Biológica de Doñana.

  • a

    Stage 1—M2 erupted and fully functional; M3 close to eruption or recently erupted. Stage 2—M3 erupted but not functional. Stage 3—M3 fully functional.

  • b

    Stage 1—Incomplete M3 root length (funnel-shaped openings). Stage 2—Complete M3 root length (parallel walls); open apical ends. Stage 3—Complete M3 apical closure.

  • c

    Stage 1—No evidence of ossification. Stage 2—Partial ossification. Stage 3—Complete ossification.

  • d

    Stage 1—No evidence of ossification. Stage 2—Partial ossification and/or evidence of osseous bridging on one side. Stage 3—Complete ossification on one side. Stage 4—Complete ossification on both sides.

  • e

    Based on the posterior extension of the sinus in the sagittal plane. Stage 1—Sella turcica. Stage 2—Dorsum sellae. Stage 3—First half of the clivus. Stage 4—Second half of the clivus.

  • f

    Most of the basisphenoid and occipital bone are missing.

  • g

    Part of the occipital bone is missing. The jugular synchodronsis score was assessed with reference only to the left side.

687733333
1714033323
1795733221
6842f333≥3
1577233333
6845g33323
1577433332
70933324
70833323
Table 2. Chimpanzee biological and chronological ages-at-death for the developmental stage of the features studied in Sts 5 and Sts 14
 FeatureDevelopmental stageBiological ageChronological age
  1. All data are for pooled sex samples. In the blank cells no current data are available. The value after the (±) symbol refers to the standard deviation.

  2. (b–e) Feature stages defined in Table 1 (see footnote).

Sts 5 craniumTooth calcificationStage ≥2bEarly adulthood or later. Root completion occurs shortly after M3 eruption (Anemone et al., 1991, 1996; Anemone and Watts, 1992; Kuykendall 1996, 2002; Anemone, 2002).≥10.1 ± 0.84 years (Anemone, 2002).
Spheno-occipital synch. (SOS)Stage 3cFrom the attainment of adulthood, that is, just before the eruption of all teeth (Krogman, 1930), to young adult, that is, early after the eruption of all teeth and around the time of first reproduction (Schultz, 1940; Zilhman, 2007) (Table 1), or older.≥ 14.5 years (Zilhman, 2007).
Petro-exoccipital synch.Stage ≥3dAdult, showing completion of the permanent dentition and closed SOS (Table 1).
Sphenoidal sinusStage 2eAdult, with the completion of the permanent dentition and closed SOS (Table 1).
Sts 14 skeletonVertebrae: annular ringsRanging from the beginning of union to almost complete unionNo precise age can be obtained. Union occurs in adults, that is, after the completion of the permanent dentition (Schultz, 1940).
Ribs: articular region epiphysesAlmost completely fused
Iliac crest epiphysisPartially fusedYoung adult, with slight dental attrition (Schultz, 1940; Schultz, 1942 in Curgy, 1965; Zilhman, 2007).From 11 to 17 years (Schutlz, 1940; Schultz, 1942 in Curgy, 1965; Kerley, 1966; Zilhman, 2007).
Pubic symphysisRidge and furrow structure attenuation. Well-limited bordersNo correlation with Pan was seen due to progressive symphyseal ankylosis (Schultz, 1940; Schultz, 1942 in Curgy, 1965; Kerley, 1966).
Sacrum: S1-S2 costal elementsCompletely fusedYoung adult or older. These elements fuse before the sacral vertebral bodies (Schutlz, 1940).Between 13 and 35 years, since the sacrum fuses between these ages (Kerley, 1966).
Sacrum: S1-S2 annular epiphysisUnfusedNo precise age can be obtained. It may remain unfused in fully grown individuals (Schutlz, 1940).
Sacrum: sacro-iliac joint epiphysisPartially fused
Table 3. Modern human biological and chronological ages-at-death for the developmental stage of the features studied in Sts 5 and Sts 14
 FeatureDevelopmental stageBiological ageChronological age
  1. All data for pooled sex samples. The value after the (±) symbol refers to the standard deviation.

  2. (b–e) Feature stages defined in Table 1 footnote.

Sts 5 craniumTooth calcificationStage ≥2bAdolescence to early adulthood or older (Scheuer and Black, 2000).≥17.5 years (Smith, 1991).
 Spheno-occipital synch. (SOS)Stage 3cFrom the end of the adolescent growth period, that is, before, but more commonly after, M3 eruption (Stewart, 1934; Melsen, 1969, in Scheuer and Black, 2000), or later.From 13 to 25 years, as determined by direct inspection or from CT scans studies (Hrdlička, 1920, in Chopra 1957; Madeline and Elster, 1995; Sahni et al., 1998; Veschi and Facchini, 2002; Coqueugniot and Weaver, 2007). Probably at the end of the second decade or in the first half of the third decade, when high percentages of the population would normally show full closure (Krogman and İşcan, 1986; Sahni et al., 1998; Veschi and Facchini, 2002).
 Petro-exoccipital synch.Stage ≥3dNo precise age can be obtained; no data on unilateral fusion are available. Bilateral fusion ranges from late adolescence-young adulthood through to fully adult individuals (Maat and Mastwijk, 1995; Hershkovitz et al., 1997).No precise age can be obtained; no data on unilateral fusion are available. Bilateral fusion occurs from mostly above 20 years of age (this occurs in 90%–93% of the population by this time; Hershkovitz et al., 1997), or 22–36 years according to Maat and Mastwijk (1995).
 Sphenoidal sinusStage 2eJuvenile or older. Most probably fully adult due to nondetectable SOS (Scuderi et al., 1993; Spaeth and Krugelstein, 1996; Weiglein, 1999; Yonetsu et al., 2000; Barghouth et al., 2002).From 15 years (Scuderi et al., 1993; Spaeth and Krugelstein, 1996) to the end of the third decade of life (this occurs in 93% of the population by this time; Yonetsu et al., 2000)
Sts 14 skeletonVertebrae: annular epiphysesRanging from the beginning of union to the achievement of almost complete unionFrom late adolescence to young adulthood (Albert and Maples, 1995).From 17 (youngest age of early Stage 2; Albert and Maples, 1995) to 27 years (oldest age of late Stage 2; Albert and Maples, 1995).
 Ribs: articular region epiphysesAlmost completely fusedJust older than the latter stages of adolescence, according to first rib ossification (Kunos et al., 1999).From above 17 to around 25 years according to first rib ossification: fusion occurs from 14 to 17–19 years. The rounded edges and lenticular profile of the facet might be expected until 21 years. The dense surface with smooth irregularities suggests 20–25 years (Kunos et al., 1999). Remaining ribs: poorly documented, the onset of fusion to the tubercle suggests an age ≥ 18 years (Fawcett, 1911; Stevenson, 1924, in Scheuer and Black, 2000).
 Iliac crest epiphysisPartially fusedFrom the adolescent period to the onset of full adulthood (see adjoining chronological ages).From 15 to 26 years (Galstaun, 1937, Lurie et al., 1943, Mckern and Stewart, 1957, Jit and Singh, 1971, Birkner, 1978, Webb and Suchey, 1985, in Scheuer and Black, 2000; Veschi and Facchini, 2002; Coqueugniot and Weaver, 2007), but most probably in the 19–22 years range (80% of the population would be expected to show this from data in Veschi and Facchini, 2002).
 Pubic symphysisRidge and furrow structure attenuation. Well-limited bordersYoung to fully adult (Todd, 1920, 1921a, b, c; Meindl et al., 1985).Around mid-late 20s: moderate to slight billowing and active rampart formation suggests 24–37 years. Appearance of distinct lower extremity suggests 25 to about 30 years. Reduced billowing together with full lower extremity definition suggests an age older than 29 (Meindl et al., 1985) to 25–30 years (Phase IV/V; Todd 1920, 1921a, b, c)
 Sacrum: S1-S2 costal elementsCompletely fusedLate adolescence to full adulthood or later (see adjoining chronological ages).≥19 years (first occurrence of complete fusion; Coqueugniot and Weaver, 2007).
 Sacrum: S1-S2 annular epiphysisUnfusedJuvenile to young adult (see adjoining chronological ages).Likely under 27 years (Mckern and Stewart, 1957, in Scheuer and Black, 2000; Coqueugniot and Weaver, 2007).
 Sacrum: sacro-iliac joint epiphysisPartially fusedJuvenile to full adulthood (see adjoining chronological ages).From 16 to 30 years (Johnston, 1961; Szilvássy 1988 in Berge and Gommery, 1999; Berge and Gommery, 1999; Rogers and Cleaves, 1935, Bollow et al., 1997, in Scheuer and Black, 2000).

Taking into account the degree of preservation of Sts 5 and Sts 14, the features studied are those of developmental significance. These features were scored in the chimpanzee comparative sample (for stage definitions see footnote in Table 1) and for the Sts 5 and Sts 14 fossils. Using the chimpanzee data, a modal pattern was established for the development of the petro-exoccipital synchondrosis and the pneumatization of the sphenoidal sinus relative to the dentition (tooth calcification and dental emergence) and the SOS. However, the chronological age-of-death of the chimpanzees studied was unknown; thus, only the relative development of these features was recorded.

The gathered data allowed the developmental status of both fossil specimens to be established, followed by the biological age-at-death of the individual(s) represented. This procedure was also used to attempt an approximation of the chronological age-at-death. To show that Sts 5 and Sts 14 belong to a single individual requires that the corresponding ages-at-death be compatible and that the relative development between the iliac crest epiphysis of Sts 14 and the SOS of Sts 5 be consistent within the framework of the chimpanzee and human patterns (as mentioned earlier).

RESULTS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. CONCLUSIONS
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. LITERATURE CITED

Chimpanzee Sample

Table 1 reveals a common pattern of relative development between the cranial traits of the chimpanzee sample. Once the dentition is erupted and completely calcified, the SOS appears fused (or about to fuse) (Fig. 2a). With respect to the sphenoidal sinus, the pneumatization of the greater wings and the area beyond the dorsum sellae occurs with the complete fusion of the SOS and the fully developed dentition (Fig. 2). These statements are in agreement with the pattern described by some authors for chimpanzees and humans (see references in Tables 2 and 3). Finally, the petro-exoccipital synchondroses show partial or complete ossification on one side at the time of completion of the dentition and SOS closure.

thumbnail image

Figure 2. Basicranium of Pan troglodytes (EBD 17957). (a) Sagittal and (b) transversal CT-scans. BO, basiocciput; BS, basisphenoid; CL, clivus; DS, dorsum sellae; FM, foramen magnum; MF, middle fossa; OP, olivary process; PET, petrous bone; SO, supraocciput; SOS, spheno-occipital synchondrosis; SS, sphenoidal sinus; ST, sella turcica. Scale bar = 2 cm.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Sts 5

Dentition

External inspection of the Sts 5 maxilla reveals no evidence of dentition (Tables 2 and 3). The commercial axial CT images (Weber et al., 1997a) show some rounded and homogeneous structures with a brighter signal than the surrounding areas in what appears to be the position of the dental roots within the maxilla (Fig. 3a). In contrast, the CT scan images of the teeth of Sts 71 (Weber et al., 1997b) show one lingual and two oral roots in the maxillary molar series to have rounded and structured morphologies, that is, a bright external layer (cementum), a darker internal area (dentine), and a central white area (root canal) resembling the cementum in shade (Fig. 3b). In comparison with the tomography of the roots of Sts 71, the apparent tooth cavities of Sts 5 have an irregular outline and are poorly structured internally (Fig. 3). The formations seen in Sts 5 are therefore probably casts of the alveolar sockets, formed as a result of mineralization and/or sedimentary filling after the complete loss of the dentition. Sts 5 was therefore concluded to be edentulous (contrasting with Thackeray et al., 2002a).

thumbnail image

Figure 3. Maxilla. Transversal tomograms of (a) Sts 5 (Weber et al., 1997a) and (b) Sts 71 (Weber et al., 1997b). Circles surrounding teeth (Sts 71) or alveoli (Sts 5): RPM3, right third premolar; RPM4, right fourth premolar; RM1, right first molar; RM2, right second molar; RM3, right third molar; LM1, left first molar; LM2, left second molar; LM3, left third molar. Scale bar = 5 cm.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Alveoli are perfect natural casts of the root of each tooth, and their size and shape change as the roots grow. In the sagittal tomogram of Sts 5, the suggested natural casts of all the alveoli cut through most of the alveolar bone of the maxilla (Fig. 4a). Further, when compared to Sts 71, these alveoli show similar development relative to the maxillary sinus (Fig. 4b). Although the alveoli of Sts 5 could have been broken, allowing the loss of the teeth, their deep ends are not likely to have been affected. This would imply that the roots of the third molars were completely developed.

thumbnail image

Figure 4. Maxilla. Sagittal tomograms of (a) Sts 5 (Weber et al., 1997a) and (b) Sts 71 (Weber et al., 1997b). (1) maxillary sinus, (2) alveolar bone, (3) fillings of the alveolar sockets, (4) roots of the maxillary dentition. Scale bar = 5 cm.

Download figure to PowerPoint

SOS

The basisphenoidal region shows no sclerotic remnants of this synchondrosis in either the CT scans or on the external surface of the fossil, indicating that its full closure was far from being recent (in agreement with Broom et al., 1950) (Fig. 5a)

thumbnail image

Figure 5. Basicranium of Sts 5. (a) Sagittal, (b) transversal (Weber et al., 1997a) and (c) coronal tomograms of Sts 5. L EXO, left exoccipital portion of the occipital bone; L PETEXO, left petro-exoccipital synchondrosis (note its complete fusion); PF, post-depositional fracture (note its continuation with the dorsal border of the sphenoidal sinus). See Fig. 2 for other abbreviations. Scale bar = 2 cm.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Sphenoidal air sinus

The sphenoidal aeration extends to the border between the dorsum sellae and the clivus, the sphenoidal wings and the anterior pterygoid processes. It is partially filled with what are probably calcite crystals, since the brain case is lined with this material (Broom et al., 1950). The pattern of pneumatization of this sinus in humans and chimpanzees and the absence of traces of the SOS in Sts 5, suggest that the sinus of Sts 5 had reached this synchondrosis and exceeded it dorsally (Fig. 5a,b)

Petro-exoccipital synchondrosis

This stage was only assessed on the left side, where the occipital and temporal bones are continuous, signifying at least unilateral complete fusion (Fig. 5c)

Cranial sutures

The dynamite blast that uncovered Sts 5 left portions of bone adhered to the calcified matrix of the breccia, making it difficult to observe most of the sutures (Broom et al., 1950; Thackeray, 1997; Prat and Thackeray, 2001). Most of the facial and palatal group of sutures are unidentifiable to the naked eye. However, the right side of the fronto-zygomatic—the left side is affected by a fracture that prevents observation of the suture—and the naso-premaxillary sutures are closed although still recognizable on the ectocranial surface (in agreement with Broom et al., 1950). In the cranial vault, only a small ectocranial portion of the sagittal suture within the bregma-lambda region is visible; it is closed (in agreement with Broom et al. 1950; Thackeray, 1997; Prat and Thackeray, 2001). The parieto-squamosal, the spheno-temporal, and the spheno-frontal sutures (belonging to the circum-meatal group of sutures) are fused but remain noticeable ectocranially on both sides (in agreement with Broom et al., 1950). Finally, in basal view, most of the occipito-mastoid suture is somewhat perceptible endocranially on the right side, and identifiable but closed ectocranially on both sides (in agreement with Broom et al., 1950), whereas in the splanchnocranium, the anterior and posterior median palatines and the spheno-palatine sutures are closed but still recognizable

Developmental stage and age-at-death of Sts 5

The lack of signs of recent closure of the SOS and the high degree of obliteration of the cranial sutures, especially those of the vault, are indicative that Sts 5 represents a fully grown cranium. Irrespective of whether the chimpanzee or human pattern is used as a model for Sts 5 (Tables 2 and 3), the state of these features signify that this cranium was part of an adult individual with a fully developed dentition. Moreover, the aerated portions of the sphenoidal sinus, the fusion status of the petro-exoccipital synchondrosis, and the probable completion of the M3 roots, are all consistent with this statement. Thus, the Pan and modern human schedules of maturation support ages-at-death of 14.5 years or older, and older than around 20 years, respectively (Tables 2 and 3)

Sts 14

Vertebrae

The annular rings of the spine of Sts 14 show a variety of stages of ossification (Fig. 6a) (Tables 2 and 3). Following the scoring system of Albert and Maples (1995), these epiphyses appear to range from the early (beginning of union; Sts 14b, Sts 14h) to late (progressing union; Sts 14d, Sts 14e, Sts 14f, Sts 14g, Sts 14i, Sts 14k, Sts 14l, Sts 14m, Sts 14n, Sts 14o, Sts 14q) phases of Stage 1, through to the early (almost complete union; Sts 14a, Sts 14c) phase of Stage 2

thumbnail image

Figure 6. Sts 14 trunk. (a) Stages of ossification of the ring epiphyses (arrows) in the Sts 14 spine: beginning of union (Sts 14b), progression of union (Sts 14m), and almost complete union (Sts 14a). (b) Articular region of one rib with the epiphyseal plate showing traces (arrows) of the suture. Scale bar = 2 cm.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Ribs

Those ribs with a preserved tubercle region (none of which were identified as a first rib) show the articular epiphyseal plate with nearly complete fusion, though the suture is still identifiable (Fig. 6b). In addition, the profile of the tubercle is no longer elliptical but distinctively lenticular, and its boundaries are mostly rounded and slightly raised above the shaft. The surface texture of the tubercle is dense with smooth depressions and ridges

Pelvis

The iliac crest is mostly fused on the left side (Sts 14r), showing only traces of the suture, while the right coxal (Sts 14s) bone shows partial loss of theanterior portion of the epiphysis, probably due to incomplete ossification (in agreement with Berge and Gommery, 1999; Häusler and Berger, 2001) (Fig. 7a)

thumbnail image

Figure 7. Sts 14 pelvis. (a) Iliac crest. (b) Sacrum. (c) Pubic symphysis. Circles highlighting the stage of the traits above inspection. Scale bar = 2 cm.

Download figure to PowerPoint

The sacrum shows incomplete fusion of the S1-S2 annular epiphysis. Further, even though the epiphyseal plate of the left sacro-iliac joint is fragmentary, the suture with the sacral alae remains discernible (in agreement with Berge and Gommery, 1999) (Fig. 7b).

The pubic symphysis of Sts 14 appears to have a characteristic ridge and furrow structure on its ventral margin, albeit mostly attenuated along the dorsal border. Additionally, its dorsal, superior and inferior margins are well limited by a continuous rim, whereas its anterior wall shows the beginning of the formation of the ventral rampart (Fig. 7c).

Femur

This lacks most of the greater trochanter and the most basal part of the lesser trochanter; they cannot, therefore be used for age diagnosis

Developmental stage and age-at-death of Sts 14

The several signs of immaturity in the ossification of the epiphyses of Sts 14 show that this skeleton had not completed its development. With respect to both the Pan and Homo sapiens patterns (Tables 2 and 3) these epiphyses are among the last to complete ossification. The individual to whom this skeleton belonged was likely fully grown in terms of height (as shown by the ossified acetabulum, and the probably-fused long bone epiphyses) and close to—thought not completely—grown in terms of body breadth (as shown by the incomplete iliac crest and sacrum epiphyses) (in agreement with Berge and Gommery, 1999). Therefore, this fossil assemblage represents part of a young adult probably between 14.5 years to 17 years according to chimpanzee standards, or somewhere in its early mid-20s according to the modern human schedule of maturation (Tables 2 and 3)

DISCUSSION

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. CONCLUSIONS
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. LITERATURE CITED

One and the Same Individual?

According to the present results, the biological and chronological ages-at-death of both specimens are partially compatible. However, Sts 5 shows no sign of having recently reached adulthood. Since the SOS of Sts 5 is no longer detectable, its closure does not appear to have occurred recently before death. Even when considering the intrapopulation variation of chimpanzees and modern humans, such a degree of the SOS closure in Sts 5 does not seem to be consistent with the still fusing iliac crest in Sts 14.

Although cranial vault closure may occur over an extended period of time in extant human populations, severe obliteration of this vault is common in fully adult individuals (Acsádi and Nemeskéri, 1970, Meindl and Lovejoy, 1985; Key et al., 1994). Therefore, against the human standard, the high degree of vault obliteration shown by Sts 5 does not suggest a young adult age.

In conclusion, no evidence supporting the idea that the studied fossils belong to a single individual was found; in fact, some data clearly suggest they belong to different individuals.

The EQ

Using previous estimates for the body mass for Sts 14 (27.6 kg by McHenry, 1976 and 34.8 kg by Jungers, 1988) and an endocranial volume for Sts 5 of 485 cm3 (Falk et al., 2000), the method of Ruff et al. (1997) was used to calculate the brain mass and EQ for a hypothetical association between Sts 5 and Sts 14. This resulted in an EQ value of 2.9–3.4, depending on the body mass estimate used. This interval lies between the uppermost estimates for A. africanus (2.4–3.0 as derived from data in McHenry and Coffing, 2000) and the lowermost limits for Homo habilis (3.4–3.8 as derived from data in McHenry and Coffing, 2000). The result for the Sts 5-Sts 14 fossil assemblage is therefore only partially compatible with our current knowledge of the encephalization of A. africanus. If these fossils do represent a single specimen, the range for the relative brain capacity of this species would be necessarily increased.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. CONCLUSIONS
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. LITERATURE CITED

A thorough re-evaluation of the developmental stage and age-at-death of the landmark Sts 5 and Sts 14 A. africanus fossils has been attempted in this work.

Contrary to the conclusions of a previous assessment (Thackeray et al., 2002a), Sts 5 was found not to belong to an adolescent specimen but to a fully grown adult whose estimated chronological age-at-death was 14.5 years or above, or more than around 20 years, according to the chimpanzee and modern human schedules of development respectively. This conclusion rests upon the following evidence: the mostly obliterated cranial vault sutures, the complete closure of the spheno-occipital and petro-exocccipital synchondroses (as observed on the left side), the pneumatization of the sphenoidal sinus to the dorsum sellae, and the adult size of the alveolar sockets in the maxilla.

Sts 14 shows signs of immaturity in the pelvis, ribs, and vertebrae. On the basis of data for chimpanzees and modern humans, the ossification stage of the studied features in Sts 14 suggests this partial skeleton belonged to a young adult that died between 14.5 to around 17 years of age according to chimpanzee standards, or within the first half of its third decade of life according to extant human standards. Previous studies on the pattern of development in A. africanus suggest that the chronological ages of both Sts 5 and Sts 14 are best determined using the chimpanzee developmental pattern.

These results also show the age-at-death of these two specimens to be partially consistent which one another. However, no evidence was found to support the idea that Sts 5 had just attained full growth, nor, therefore, that Sts 5 is the cranium of the young adult Sts 14 partial skeleton. Further, the stage of development of some of the Sts 5 features suggest it unlikely that this be the skull of a young adult.

Finally, the lower value of the EQ range resulting from a hypothetical association between Sts 5 and Sts 14 lie at the top end of that currently supposed for A. africanus. Should future research confirm such an association, the relative brain capacity of this species would necessarily increase, shortening the distance separating Homo and Australopithecus.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. CONCLUSIONS
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. LITERATURE CITED

The authors thank the staff of the Transvaal Museum (Pretoria, South Africa), especially Francis Thackeray, for allowing us to study the original fossils Sts 14, Sts 5, and Sts 71. They are also indebted to the Estación Biológica de Doñana, Spain, for granting access to its chimpanzee collection, and to the University of Burgos, Spain, where some of the CT scans were performed. Their thanks also go to A. Gracia, I. Martínez, F. Gracia, and A. Alcazar de Velasco for their helpful commentaries and guidance, to E. Poza, R. Quam and E. Santos for their help, and to the staff at the Centro UCM-ISCIII de Evolución y Comportamiento Humano.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. CONCLUSIONS
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. LITERATURE CITED
  • Abbie AA. 1950. Closure of cranial articulations in the skull of the Australian aborigine. J Anat Lond 84: 112.
  • Acsádi G,Nemeskéri J. 1970. History of human life span and mortality. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
  • Albert AM,Maples WR. 1995. Stages of epiphyseal union for thoracic and lumbar vertebral centra as a method of age determination for teenage and young adult skeletons. J Forensic Sci 40: 623633.
  • Anemone RL. 2002. Dental development and life history in hominid evolution. In: Minugh-PurvisN,McNamaramKJ, editors. Human evolution through developmental change. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. p 249280.
  • Anemone RL,Mooney MP,Siegel MI. 1996. Longitudinal study of dentition development in chimpanzees of known chronological age: implications for understanding the age at death of Plio-Pleistocene hominids. Am J Phys Anthropol 99: 119133.
  • Anemone RL,Watts ES. 1992. Dental development in apes and humans: a comment on Simpson, Lovejoy and Meindl. J Hum Evol 22: 149153.
  • Anemone RL,Watts ES,Swindler DR. 1991. Dental development of known-age chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes (Primates, Pongidae). Am J Phys Anthropol 86: 229241.
  • Ashley-Montagu MF. 1935. The premaxilla in the primates. Q Rev Biol 10: 181208.
  • Ashley-Montagu MF. 1937. The medio-frontal suture and the problem of metopism in the primates. J R Anthrop Inst 67: 157201.
  • Barghouth J,Prior J,Lepori D,Duvoisin B,Schnyder P,Gudinchet F. 2002. Paranasal sinuses in children: size evaluation of maxillary, sphenoid, and frontal sinuses by magnetic resonance imaging and proposal of volume index percentile curves. Eur Radiol 12: 14511548.
  • Berge C. 1998. Heterochronic processes in human evolution: an ontogenetic analysis of the hominid pelvis. Am J Phys Anthropol 105: 441459.
  • Berge C,Gommery D. 1999. Le sacrum de Sterkfontein Sts 14 Q (Australopithecus africanus): nouvelles données sur la croissance et sur l'âge osseux du spécimen (hommage à R. Broom et J. T. Robinson). C R Acad Sci Paris, Sciences de la terre et des planètes 329: 227232.
  • Beynon AD. 1986. Tooth growth and structure in living and fossils hominoids. In: CruwysE,FoleyRA, editors. Teeth and anthropology. Oxford: B.A.R. p 2330.
  • Beynon AD,Dean MC. 1988. Distinct dental development patterns in early fossil hominids. Nature 335: 509514.
  • Beynon AD,Wood BA. 1987. Patterns and rates of enamel growth in the molar teeth of early hominids. Nature 326: 493496.
  • Birkner R. 1978. Normal radiographic patterns and variances of the human skeleton—an X-ray atlas of adults and children. Baltimore-Munich: Urban and Schwarzenberg.
  • Bollow M,Braun J,Kannenberg J,Biedermann T,Schauer-Petrowskaja C,Paris S,Mutze S,Hamm B. 1997. Normal morphology of the sacroiliac joints in children: magnetic resonance studies related to age and sex. Skeletal Radiol 26: 697704.
  • Brain CK. 1957. New evidence for the correlation of the Transvaal ape-man bearing cave deposits. In: ClarkJD, editor. Proceedings of the Pan-African congress on prehistory 3. Livingstone, 1955. London: Chatto and Windus. p 143148.
  • Brain CK. 1958. The Transvaal ape-man bearing cave deposits. Trans Mus Mem 11: 131.
  • Bromage TG. 1985. Taung facial remodeling: a growth and development study. In: TobiasPV, editor. Hominid evolution: past, present, and future. New York: Alan R. Liss. p 239245.
  • Bromage TG. 1986. A comparative scanning electron microscope study of facial growth and remodeling in early hominids. Ph.D. Thesis. Toronto: University of Toronto.
  • Bromage TG. 1987. The biological and chronological maturation of early hominids. J Hum Evol 16: 257272.
  • Bromage TG,Dean MC. 1985. Re-evaluation of the age at death of immature fossil hominids. Nature 317: 525527.
  • Broom R,Robinson JT,Schepers GWH. 1950. Further evidence of the structure of the Sterkfontein ape-Man. Plesianthropus. Trans Mus Mem 4: 117.
  • Chopra SRK. 1957. The cranial suture closure in monkeys. Proc Zool Soc Lond 128: 67112.
  • Clarke RJ. 1985. Early Acheulean with Homo habilis at Sterkfontein. In: TobiasPV, editor. Hominid evolution: past, present, and future. New York: Alan R. Liss. p 287298.
  • Clarke RJ. 1994. On some new interpretations of Sterkfontein stratigraphy. S Afr J Sci 90: 211214.
  • Clarke RJ. 2002. On the unrealistic “revised age estimates” for Sterkfontein. S Afr J Sci 98: 415418.
  • Conroy GC,Vannier MW. 1987. Dental development of the Taung skull from computerized tomography. Nature 329: 625627.
  • Conroy GC,Vannier MW. 1988. The nature of Taung dental maturation continued. Nature 333: 808.
  • Conroy GC,Vannier MW. 1991. Dental development in South African australopithecines. I. Problems of pattern and chronology. Am J Phys Anthropol 86: 121136.
  • Coqueugniot H,Weaver TD. 2007. Infracranial maturation in the skeletal collection from Coimbra, Portugal: new aging standards for epiphyseal union. Am J Phys Anthropol 134: 424437.
  • Curgy JJ. 1965. Apparition et soudure des points d'ossification des membres chez les mammiféres. Mem Mus Nat Hist Nat Série A, Zoologie 32: 12307.
  • Dean MC. 1987a. The dental developmental status of six East African juvenile fossil hominids. J Hum Evol 16: 197213.
  • Dean MC. 1987b. Growth layers and incremental markings in hard tissues; a review of the literature and some preliminary observations about enamel structure in Paranthropus boisei. J Hum Evol 16: 157172.
  • Dean MC. 1988. Growth processes in the cranial base of hominoids and their bearing on morphological similarities that exist in the cranial base of Homo and Paranthropus. In: GrineFE, editor. Evolutionary history of the “robust” australopithecines. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. p 107112.
  • Dean MC. 2000. Progress in understanding hominoid dental development. J Anat 197: 77101.
  • Dean MC,Leakey MG,Reid D,Schrenk F,Schwartz GT,Stringer C,Walker A. 2001. Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins. Nature 414: 628631.
  • Falk D,Redmond JC,Guyer J,Conroy GC,Recheis W,Weber GW,Seidler H. 2000. Early hominid brain evolution: a new look at old endocast. J Hum Evol 38: 695717.
  • Fawcett E. 1911. Some notes on the epiphyses of ribs. J Anat Physiol 45: 172178.
  • Galstaun G. 1937. A study of ossification as observed in Indian subjects. Indian J Med Res 25: 267324.
  • Gommery D,Thackeray JF. 2006. Sts 14, a male subadult partial skeleton of Australopithecus africanus? S Afr J Sci 102: 9192.
  • Gruspier KL,Mullen GJ. 1991. Maxillary suture obliteration: a test of the Mann method. J Forensic Sci 36: 512519.
  • Häusler M,Berger L. 2001. Stw 441/465: a new fragmentary ilium of a small-bodied Australopithecus africanus from Sterkfontein, South Africa. J Hum Evol 40: 411417.
  • Hershkovitz I,Latimer BM,Dutour O,Jellema LM,Wish-Baratz S,Christine R,Rothschild BM. 1997. The elusive petroexoccipital articulation. Am J Phys Anthropol 103: 365373.
  • Howell FC. 1967. Review of man-apes or ape-men? by W.E. Le Gros Clark. Am J Phys Anthropol 27: 95101.
  • Hrdlicka A. 1920. Anthropometry. Philadelphia: Wistar Institute.
  • Jit I,Singh B. 1971. A radiological study of the time of fusion of certain epiphyses in Punjabees. J Anat Soc India 20: 127.
  • Johnston FE. 1961. Sequence of epiphyseal union in a prehistoric Kentucky population from Indian Knoll. Hum Biol 33: 6681.
  • Jungers WL. 1988. New estimates of body size in australopithecines. In: GrineFE, editor. Evolutionary history of the “robust” australopithecines. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. p 115126.
  • Kerley ER. 1966. Skeletal age changes in the chimpanzee. Tulane Stud Zool 13: 7180.
  • Key CA,Aiello LC,Molleson T. 1994. Cranial suture closure and its implications for age estimation. Int J Osteoarchaeol 4: 193207.
  • Krogman WM. 1930. Studies in growth changes in the skull and face of anthropoids. Am J Anat 46: 315353.
  • Krogman WM. 1939. A guide to the identification of human skeletal material. FBI Law Enforc Bull 8: 331.
  • Krogman WM,Iscan MY. 1986. The human skeleton in forensic medicine. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.
  • Kuman K,Clarke RJ. 2000. Stratigraphy, artefact industries and hominid associations for Sterkfontein Member 5. J Hum Evol 38: 827847.
  • Kunos CA,Simpson SW,Russell KF,Hershkovitz I. 1999. First rib metamorphosis: its possible utility for human age-at-death estimation. Am J Phys Anthropol 110: 303323.
  • Kuykendall KL. 1996. Dental development in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): the timing of tooth calcification stages. Am J Phys Anthropol 99: 159174.
  • Kuykendall KL. 2002. An assessment of radiographic and histological standards of dental development in chimpanzees. In: Minugh-PurvisN,McNamaramKJ, editors. Human evolution through developmental change. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. p 281304.
  • Lampl M,Monge JM,Mann AE. 1993. Further observations on a method for estimating hominoid dental developmental patterns. Am J Phys Anthropol 90: 113117.
  • Lurie LA,Levy S,Lurie ML. 1943. Determination of bone age in children. J Pediatr 23: 131140.
  • Maat GJR,Mastwijk RW. 1995. Fusion status of the jugular growth plate: an aid for age at death determination. Int J Osteoarchaeol 5: 163167.
  • Madeline LA,Elster AD. 1995. Suture closure in the human chondrocranium: CT assesment. Radiology 196: 747756.
  • Mann AE. 1975. Some paleodemographic aspects of the South African australopithecines. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
  • Mann AE. 1988. The nature of Taung dental maturation. Nature 333: 123.
  • Mann AE,Lampl M,Monge J. 1987. Maturational patterns in early hominids. Nature 328: 673674.
  • Mann AE,Lampl M,Monge J. 1990. Patterns of ontogeny in human evolution: evidence from dental development. Yearb Phys Anthrop 33: 111150.
  • Mann RW,Jantz RL,Bass WM,Willey PS. 1991. Maxillary suture obliteration: a visual method for estimating skeletal age. J Forensic Sci 36: 781791.
  • McHenry HM. 1976. Early hominid body weight and encephalization. Am J Phys Anthropol 45: 7784.
  • McHenry HM,Coffing K. 2000. Australopithecus to Homo: transformations in body and mind. A Rev Anthrop 29: 125146.
  • Mckern TW,Stewart TD. 1957. Skeletal age changes in young American males, analysed from the standpoint of age identification. Natick, MA: U.S. Army, Quartermasters Research and Development Command, Technical Report No. EP-45.
  • Meindl RS,Lovejoy CO. 1985. Ectocranial suture closure: a revised method for the determination of skeletal age at death based on the lateral-anterior sutures. Am J Phys Anthropol 69: 5766.
  • Meindl RS,Lovejoy CO,Mensforth RP,Walker RA. 1985. A revised method of age determination using the os pubis, with a review and tests of accuracy of other current methods of pubis symphyseal aging. Am J Phys Anthropol 68: 2945.
  • Melsen B. 1969. Time and mode of closure of the spheno-occipital synchondrosis determined on dried skulls. Acta Odontol Scand 27: 7390.
  • Partridge TC. 1978. Re-appraisal of lithostratigraphy of Sterkfontein hominid site. Nature 275: 282287.
  • Partridge TC. 2005. Dating of the Sterkfontein hominids: progress and possibilities. Trans R Soc S Afr 60: 107110.
  • Partridge TC,Granger DE,Caffee MW,Clarke RJ. 2003. Lower Pliocene hominid remains from Sterkfontein. Science 300: 607612.
  • Partridge TC,Shaw J,Heslop D,Clarke RJ. 1999. The new hominid skeleton from Sterkfontein, South Africa: age and preliminary assessment. J Quaternary Sci 14: 192198.
  • Partridge TC,Watts IB. 1991. The stratigraphy of the Sterkfontein hominid deposit and its relationship to the underground cave system. Palaeont Afr 28: 3540.
  • Pickering TR,Clarke RJ,Moggi-Cecchi J. 2004. Role of carnivores in the accumulation of the Sterkfontein Member 4 hominid assemblage: a taphonomic reassessment of the complete hominid fossil sample (1936-1999). Am J Phys Anthropol 125: 115.
  • Prat S,Thackeray JF. 2001. Position des lignes temporales sur le cranium de ≪Mrs≫ Ples (A. africanus): une attribution sexuelle est-elle possible? C R Acad Sci Paris, Sciences de la terre et des planètes 332: 403409.
  • Robinson JT. 1962. Sterkfontein stratigraphy and the significance of the Extension Site. S Afr Archaeol Bull 17: 87107.
  • Robinson JT. 1972. Early hominid posture and locomotion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Robinson JT,Manson RJ. 1962. Australopithecines and artefacts at Sterkfontein. S Afr Archaeol Bull 17: 97115.
  • Rogers MH,Cleaves EN. 1935. The adolescent sacro-iliac joint syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 17: 759768.
  • Ruff CB,Trinkaus E,Holliday TW. 1997. Body mass and encephalization in Pleistocene Homo. Nature 387: 173176.
  • Sahni D,Neelam IJ,Suri S. 1998. Time of fusion of the basisphenoid with the basilar part of the occipital bone in Northwest Indian subjects. Forensic Sci Int 98: 4145.
  • Scheuer L,Black S. 2000. Developmental juvenile osteology. London: Academic Press.
  • Schultz AH. 1940. Growth and development of the chimpanzee. Contrib Embryol 170: 163.
  • Schultz AH. 1942. Morphologicals observations on a gorilla and an orang utan of closely known age. Am J Phys Anthropol 29: 121.
  • Schwartz JH,Tatersall I. 2005.The human fossil record. Volume IV: craniodental morphology of early hominids (Genera Australopithecus, Paranthropus, Orrorin), an overview. New Jersey: Wiley.
  • Scuderi AJ,Hamsberger HR,Boyer RS. 1993. Pneumatization of the paranasal sinuses: normal features of importance to the accurate interpretation of CT scans and MR images. Am J Roentgenol 160: 11011204.
  • Singer R. 1953. Estimation of age from cranial suture closure. J Forensic Med 1: 5259.
  • Smith BH. 1986. Dental development in Australopithecus and early Homo. Nature 323: 327330.
  • Smith BH. 1987. Dental development in fossil hominids. Am J Phys Anthropol 72: 255.
  • Smith BH. 1991. Standards of human tooth formation and dental age assessment. In: KelleyMA,LarsenCS, editors. Advances in dental anthropology. New York: Wiley-Liss. p 143168.
  • Smith BH. 2004. The paleontology of growth and development. Evol Anthrop 13: 239241.
  • Spaeth J,Krugelstein U. 1996. Development of the spheno-ethmoid paranasal sinus system using axial computerized tomography imaging. Laryngorhinootologie 75: 344350.
  • Stevenson PH. 1924. Age order of epiphyseal union in man. Am J Phys Anthropol 17: 5393.
  • Stewart TD. 1934. Sequence of epiphyseal union, third molar eruption and suture closure in Eskimos and American Indians. Am J Phys Anthropol 19: 433452.
  • Stiles D,Partridge TC. 1979. Results of recent archaeological and palaeoenvironmental studies at the Sterkfontein Extension Site. S Afr J Sci 75: 346352.
  • Szilvássy J. 1988. Altersdiagnose am skelett. In: KnußmanR, editor. Wesen und methoden der anthropologie, I. Teil, wissenschafttheorie, geschichte, morphologischen methoden. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag. p 421442.
  • Tanner JM. 1962. Developmental age and the concept of physiological maturity. In: Growth at adolescence. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. p 5593.
  • Thackeray JF. 1997. Cranial bone of ‘Mrs Ples’ (Sts 5): fragments adhering to matrix. S Afr J Sci 93: 169170.
  • Thackeray JF,Braga J,Treil J,Niksch N,Labuschagne JH. 2002a. ‘Mrs Ples’ (Sts 5) from Sterkfontein: an adolescent male? S Afr J Sci 98: 2122.
  • Thackeray JF,Gommery D,Braga J. 2002b. Australopithecines postcrania (Sts 14) from the Sterkfontein caves, South Africa: the skeleton of ‘Mrs Ples’? S Afr J Sci 98: 211212.
  • Tobias PV. 1979. The Sildeberg Grotto, Sterkfontein, Transvaal, and its importance in palaeonanthropological researches. S Afr J Sci 75: 161164.
  • Tobias PV,Hughes AR. 1969. The new Witswaterand University excavation at Sterkfontein. S Afr Archaeol Bull 24: 158169.
  • Todd TW. 1920. Age changes in the pubic bone. I. The white male pubis. Am J Phys Anthropol 3: 347470.
  • Todd TW. 1921a. Age changes in the pubic bone. II. The pubis of the male negro-white hybrid. Am J Phys Anthropol 4: 125.
  • Todd TW. 1921b. Age changes in the pubic bone. III. The pubis of the white female. Am J Phys Anthropol 4: 2639.
  • Todd TW. 1921c. Age changes in the pubic bone. IV. The pubis of the female negro-white hybrid. Am J Phys Anthropol 4: 4057.
  • Todd TW,Lyon DW,Jr. 1924. Endocranial suture closure. Its progress and age relationship. I. Adult males of white stock. Am J Phys Anthropol 7: 325384.
  • Todd TW,Lyon DW,Jr. 1925a. Cranial suture closure. Its progress and age relationship. II. Ectocranial closure in adult males of white stock. Am J Phys Anthropol 8: 2346.
  • Todd TW,Lyon DW,Jr. 1925b. Cranial suture closure. Its progress and age relationship. III. Endocranial closure in adult males of negro stock. Am J Phys Anthropol 8: 4771.
  • Todd TW,Lyon DW,Jr. 1925c. Cranial suture closure. Its progress and age relationship. IV. Ectocranial closure in adult males of negro stock. Am J Phys Anthropol 8: 149168.
  • Veschi S,Facchini F. 2002. Recherches sur la collection d'enfants et d'adolescents d'âge et de sexe connus de Bologne (Italie): diagnose de l'âge sur la base de degré de maturation osseuse. Bull Mém Soc Anthrop Paris 14: 263294.
  • Webb PAO,Suchey JM. 1985. Epiphyseal union of the anterior iliac crest and medial clavicle in a modern sample of American males and females. Am J Phys Anthropol 68: 457466.
  • Weber GW,Seidler H,Thackeray JF,Braga J,Treil J,Recheis W,zur Nedden D,Conroy GC. 1997a. Sts 5. CD-ROM edition—fossil hominids. Vienna: Institute for Anthropology, University of Vienna.
  • Weber GW,Seidler H,Thackeray JF,Braga J,Treil J,Recheis W,zur Nedden D,Conroy GC. 1997b. Sts 71. CD-ROM edition—fossil hominids. Vienna: Institute for Anthropology, University of Vienna.
  • Weiglein AH. 1999. Development of the paranasal sinuses in humans. In: KoppeT,NagaiH,AltKW, editors. The paranasal sinuses of higher primates. Munich: Quintessence. p 3550.
  • Wilkinson MJ. 1973. Sterkfontein cave system: evolution of a karst form. Ph.D. Thesis. Johannesburg: University of Witwatersrand.
  • Wilkinson MJ. 1983. Geomorphic perspectives on the Sterkfontein australopithecine breccias. J Archaeol Sci 10: 515529.
  • Wood Jones F. 1946. Buchanan's manual of anatomy. 7th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
  • Yonetsu K,Watanabe M,Nakamura T. 2000. Age-related expansion and reduction in aeration of the sphenoid sinus: volume assessment by helical CT scanning. Am J Neuroradiol 21: 179182.
  • Zihlman AL,Bolter DR,Boesch C. 2007. Skeletal and dental growth and development in chimpanzees of the Taï National Park, Côte D'Ivoire. J Zool 273: 6373.