SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Aiello L, Dean C. 2002. An introduction to human evolutionary anatomy. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.
  • Auger F, Jamison PL, Balslev-Jorgensen J, Lewin T, De Pena JF, Skrobak-Kaczynski J. 1980. Anthropometry of circumpolar populations. In: MilanFA, editor. The human biology of circumpolar populations. New York: Cambridge University Press. p 213255.
  • Begun DR. 2007. How to identify (as opposed to define) a homoplasty: examples from fossil and living great apes. J Hum Evol 52: 559572.
  • Bookstein FL. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge University Press.
  • Bookstein FL. 1996. Standard formula for the uniform shape component in landmark data. In: MarcusLF, CortiM, LoyA, NaylorGJP, SliceDE, editors. Advances in morphometrics. New York: Plenum. p 153169.
  • Bock WJ, von Wahlert G. 1965. Adaptation and the form-function complex. Evolution 19: 269299.
  • Cobb SN, O'Higgins P. 2004. Hominins do not share a common postnatal facial ontogenetic shape trajectory. J Exp Zool 302B: 302321.
  • Conroy GC, Rose MD. 1983. The evolution of the primate foot from the earliest primates to the miocene hominoids. Foot Ankle 3: 342364.
  • Delson E, Terranova CJ, Jungers WL, Sargis EJ, Jablonski NG, Dechow PC. 2000. Body mass in cercopithecidae (Primates, Mammalia): estimation and scaling in extinct and Extant Taxa Anthrol Pap American Museum of Natural History Number 83.
  • DeSilva JM. 2009. Functional morphology of the ankle and the likelihood of climbing in early hominins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 65676572.
  • Fleagle JG. 1999. Primate adaptation and evolution. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Frost SR, Marcus LF, Bookstein FL, Reddy DP, Delson E. 2003. Cranial allometry, phylogeography, and systematics of large-bodied papionins (Primates: Cercopithecinae) inferred from morphometric analysis of landmark data. Anat Rec 275A: 10481072.
  • Gebo DL. 1992. Plantigrady and foot adaptation in african apes: implications for hominid origins. Am J Phys Anthropol 89: 2958.
  • Gebo DL, Schwartz GT. 2006. Foot bones from omo: implications for hominid evolution. Am J Phys Anthropol 129: 499511.
  • Good P. 2000. Permutation tests: a practical guide to resampling methods for testing hypothesis. New York: Springer.
  • Hall BK. 1998. Evolutionary developmental biology. London, New York: Chapman & Hall.
  • Hall BK. 2005. Bones and cartilage. Elsevier Academic Press.
  • Harcourt-Smith WEH. 2002. Form and function in the hominoid tarsal skeletal structure. PhD thesis, University College London, London.
  • Jungers WL. 1988. Relative joint size and hominoid locomotor adaptations with implications for the evolution of hominid bipedalism. J Hum Evol 17: 247265.
  • Katzmarzyk PT, Leonard WR. 1998. Climatic influences on human body size and proportions: ecological adaptations and secular trends. Am J Phys Anthropol 106: 483503.
  • Kendall DG. 1984. Shape manifolds, procrustean metrics and complex projective spaces. Bull Lond Math Soc 16: 81121.
  • Kraus B. 1961. The western apache: some anthropometric observations. Am J Phys Anthropol 19: 227236.
  • Latimer B, Ohman JC, Lovejoy CD. 1987. Talocrural joint in African hominoids: implications for Australopithecus afarensis. Am J Phys Anthropol 74: 155175.
  • Lewis OJ. 1989. Functional morphology of the evolving hand and foot. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Lieberman DE, Delvin MJ, Pearson OM. 2001. Articular area response to mechanical loading: effects of exercise, age, and skeletal location. Am J Phys Anthropol 116: 266277.
  • Lockwood CJ, Fleagle GJ. 1999. The recognition and evaluation of homoplasty in primate and human evolution. Yearb Phys Anthropol 42: 189232.
  • Lovejoy CO, Cohen MJ, White TD. 2000. The evolution of mammalian morphology: a developmental perspective. In: O'HigginsPO, CohnMJ, editors. Development, growth and evolution. San Diego: Academic Press. p 4155.
  • Meldrum DJ. 1991. Kinematics of the cercopithecine foot on arboreal and terrestrial substrates with implications for the interpretation of hominid terrestrial adaptation. Am J Phys Anthropol 84: 273289.
  • O'Higgins P, Jones N. 1998. Facial growth in Cerocebus torquatus: an application of three-dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to the study of morphometric variation. J Anat 193: 251272.
  • O'Higgins P, Jones N. 2006. Tools for statistical shape analysis. Hull York Medical School. Available at: http://sites.google.com/site/hymsfme/resources.
  • Pearson OM. 2004. The aging of Wolff's “law”: ontogeny and responses to mechanical loading in cortical bone. Yearb Phys Anthropol 47: 6399.
  • Raaum RL, Sterner KN, Noviello CM, Stewart C, Distoll TR. 2005. Catarrhine primate divergence dates estimated from complete mitochondrial genomes: concordance with fossil and nuclear DNA evidence. J Hum Evol 48: 237257.
  • Rafferty KL, Ruff CB. 1994. Articular structure and function in hylobates, colobus, and papio. Am J Phys Anthropol 94: 395408.
  • Rohlf FJ, Slice D. 1990. Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superposition of landmarks. Syst Zool 39: 4059.
  • Rohlf FJ. 1998. NTSY Spc 2.2 Exeter Software.
  • Rohlf FJ. 2006. A comment on phylogenetic correction. Evolution 60: 15091515.
  • Ruff C. 1988. Hindlimb articular surface allometry in hominoidea and macaca, with comparison to diaphyseal scaling. J Hum Evol 17: 687714.
  • Ruff CB. 2002. Long bone articular and diaphyseal structure in old world monkeys and apes. I: locomotor effects. Am J Phys Anthropol 119: 305342.
  • Slice DE. 1998. Morpheus et al. Ecology and evolution. Stony Brook: State University of New York.
  • Smith JD, Jungers WL. 1997. Body mass in comparative primatology. J Hum Evol 32: 523559.
  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
  • Stern JT, Susman RL. 1991. “Total Morphological Pattern” Versus the “Magic Trait”: conflicting approaches to the study of early hominid bipedalism. In: CoppensY, SenutB, editors, Origine(s) de la Bipedie chez les Hominides. Cathiers de Paleoanthroplogie, Editions du CNRS, Paris. p 99111.
  • Turley K, Henderson E, Frost S. 2008. Distal tibial shape and presentation reflect the type of substrate. Am J Phys Anthropol 135: 210.
  • Turley K, Henderson E, Frost S. 2009. Astragalus proximal facet shape: differences in articular morphology among closely related hominoid taxa. Am J Phys Anthropol (Supplement) 48: 258.
  • Vancata V. 1991. The roots of hominid bipedality. In: CoppensY, SenutB, editors. Origine(s) de la Bipedie chez les Hominides. Cathiers de Paleoanthroplogie, Editions du CNRS, Paris. p 143158.
  • Wagner GP. 2001. The character concept in evolutionary biology. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • White TD, Folkens PA. 2000. Human Osteology, 2nd ed. Academic Press.
  • Wiley DF. 2006. Landmark editor. University of California, Davis, wiley@cs.ucdavis.edu.
  • Wunderlich RE, Jungers WL. 2009. Manual digital pressures during knuckle-walking in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Am J Phys Anthropol 139: 394403.
  • Xing J, Witherspoon DJ, Ray DA, Batzer MA, Jorde LB. 2007. Mobile DNA elements in primate and human evolution. Yearb Phys Anthropol 50: 219.