Comparative Study of Trans-Oral and Trans-Tracheal Intratracheal Instillations in a Murine Model of Acute Lung Injury

Authors


Abstract

Animal model is of importance to further elucidate the pathogenesis of acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We envisioned a possibility that there might be the differences in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced acute lung inflammation by the trans-oral and trans-tracheal intratracheal instillations. We compared the LPS-induced early inflammatory responses by these two methods. The evaluative system included bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid biochemical analysis and differential cell counting, lung wet/dry weight ratio and lung histology. In vitro studies were performed on human bronchial epithelial cell line NCI-H292 and alveolar Type II epithelial cell line A549 stimulated with LPS. Both interleukin (IL)-8 release in the BAL fluid and IL-8 secretions from NCI-H292 and A549 cells were measured. We found that the trans-tracheal intratracheal instillation promoted the LPS-induced cell injury, neutrophil infiltration, and pulmonary edema compared to the trans-oral one. The LPS-induced pathological changes by the trans-oral intratracheal instillation were characterized by pulmonary interstitial edema, but the trans-tracheal intratracheal instillation was exudative pulmonary edema. More IL-8 is produced from A549 cells than from NCI-H292 cells under the treatment of LPS. The increased IL-8 release in the BAL fluid and enhanced inflammatory responses caused by LPS may be due to more LPS delivered into the alveolar spaces by the trans-tracheal intratracheal instillation compared to the trans-oral one. The trans-tracheal intratracheal instillation is proved to be more suitable to establish the murine model of ALI than the trans-oral one and helpful to further elucidate the pathogenesis of ALI/ARDS. Anat Rec, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Ancillary