Regeneration Thematic Paper
Studying Mechanisms of Regeneration in Amphibian and Reptilian Vertebrate Models
Version of Record online: 29 AUG 2012
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
The Anatomical Record
Volume 295, Issue 10, pages 1529–1531, October 2012
How to Cite
Kusumi, K. and Fisher, R. E. (2012), Studying Mechanisms of Regeneration in Amphibian and Reptilian Vertebrate Models. Anat Rec, 295: 1529–1531. doi: 10.1002/ar.22541
- Issue online: 12 SEP 2012
- Version of Record online: 29 AUG 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 7 JUL 2012
- Manuscript Received: 18 JUN 2012
- Arizona Biomedical Research Commission. Grant Number: 1113
- National Center for Research Resources and the Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (ORIP) of the National Institutes of Health. Grant Number: R21 RR031305
Regeneration, or the de novo formation of new organs or tissues, is observed in many different classes of vertebrates (reviewed in Alibardi, 2010). In teleost fishes, regeneration of heart muscle as well as the cartilage, nerves, and skin of tail fins have been characterized (reviewed in Tanaka and Ferretti, 2009; Poss, 2010). Anuran and urodele amphibians have both been the subject of classic studies of regeneration. The salamander is capable of regeneration of both limbs and tail following amputation, and the Xenopus laevis frog can regrow these structures at the tadpole stage (reviewed in Han et al., 2005; Slack et al., 2008; Tanaka and Ferretti, 2009). Among amniote vertebrates, lizards retain substantial capacity for regeneration of the skin, musculoskeletal, and nervous tissues after loss of the tail (reviewed in Alibardi, 2010). This issue features studies of regeneration in amphibian and reptilian vertebrate models.1
Historically, studies of regeneration have focused on a specific model system, and only recently have comparative studies of regeneration been undertaken across species. This effort has been advanced by genome sequencing efforts that have allowed for the rapid development of molecular reagents for comparison of orthologous genes and pathways among the vertebrates. A central question as these comparative studies advance is whether the mechanisms regulating regeneration represent variation of a monophyletic trait, or whether regenerative mechanisms have evolved multiple times in vertebrates. This question directly impacts the applicability of regenerative studies in these vertebrate species for potential clinical therapeutic approaches. Genomic sequencing of tetrapod vertebrate models, including the chicken, the lizard Anolis carolinensis, and the frog Xenopus tropicalis, highlight the degree to which gene homologs are conserved in evolution (International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium, 2004; Hellsten et al., 2010; Alföldi et al., 2011). The capacity for regeneration is substantially reduced in mammals, except during immediate postnatal periods as was demonstrated in cardiac muscle regrowth (Porrello et al., 2011). However, if the genes and pathways regulating regeneration were conserved among vertebrates, this would open up future approaches to harness these mechanisms in mammals, including humans.
Analyses of regeneration in the tadpole stage of the African clawed frog, X. laevis, have leveraged the molecular reagents developed for this classic developmental model (Sive et al., 2000). In particular, the generation of transgenic Xenopus tadpoles is a major advance in molecular genetic analysis of the regenerative process. Overexpression of key regulatory genes can be achieved, and the use of fluorescent reporter genes allows for lineage tracing and studies of cell autonomy. In this issue, Lin et al. (2012) demonstrate the power of these transgenic tools in dissecting the regulation of regeneration of specific cellular populations. They report generation of both temperature sensitive and doxycycline inducible transgenes and use them to study whether Wnt and FGF signaling are required during regeneration. Tissues carrying transgenes for Dickkopf1 (dkk1), an antagonist of Wnt signaling, or the dominant negative form of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor were transplanted into wild-type tadpoles (Lin and Slack, 2008). Using a combination of modern and classical techniques, they were able to demonstrate essential roles for these pathways for spinal cord and muscle regeneration.
While tadpoles are capable of tail regeneration at earlier stages, later stages lack regrowth after amputation, making Xenopus a model of regenerative capacity that has temporal windows, as seen in humans (Illingworth, 1974; Muller et al., 1999; Beck et al., 2003; Gargioli and Slack, 2004; Chen et al., 2006; Franchini and Bertolotti, 2011). Interestingly, specific regulation of bioelectrical signaling can induce tadpole tail regeneration in later stages (Levin, 2009). A longstanding question has been how biophysical changes, such as those established by ion concentration and transmembrane voltage gradients, direct the regulation of transcriptional activation in the regenerative process. In this issue, Tseng and Levin (2012) explore the role of transmembrane potentials and its effects on chromatin-mediated gene regulation. By modulating a chloride channel in X. laevis, a voltage gradient was generated within the tadpole tail. Depolarization during regenerative stages led to decrease in growth response post-amputation, whereas the opposite was observed at later refractory stages. Tseng and Levin (2012) hypothesize that the link between the voltage gradient and chromatin modification may be through the Na+-coupled monocarboxylate transporter, SLC5A8/SMCT1, through its action of transporting the histone deacetylase inhibitor, butyrate.
King et al. (2012) utilize the Xenopus model to explore the relationship between inflammation and regeneration. Modulation of an inflammatory response is a critical first step prior to the regenerative process. Mescher and coworkers report that treatment of the amputated Xenopus hindlimb with certain anti-inflammatory agents inhibits the regenerative process, whereas therapy with others promote it. They also demonstrate that proinflammatory agents can regulate the levels of proinflammatory, dedifferentiation, and limb-patterning genes. These findings indicate that regeneration requires a continuously modulated balance between factors that promote local inflammation versus those that promote blastema formation.
Standard methods for analyzing the regenerating limb in Xenopus rely on tissue treatments, such as decalcifying agents, which make the tissues incompatible with most immunohistochemical analyses. To advance molecular studies of Xenopus tadpole limb regeneration, a new protocol using the contrast-agent Hexabrix in microcomputer tomography (microCT) is presented by Chen et al. (2012). As the regenerating endoskeleton is primarily cartilaginous, this tissue is difficult to detect using standard microCT techniques. Optimized concentrations of Hexabrix and imaging parameters yielded high-resolution images of cartilaginous tissue. This novel imaging protocol, utilizing a clinically available, low toxicity contrast agent, provides a valuable tool for regeneration research.
Urodele amphibians such as the axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) are the classic model of limb and tail regeneration (Campbell et al., 2011). In this issue, Makanae and Satoh (2012) demonstrate the utility of the accessory limb model (ALM), which can be induced in axolotl by a skin wound, deviation of a nerve, and subsequent contralateral skin graft. The ALM can be utilized to study nerve function and apical ectodermal cap induction and to compare wound healing with blastema formation. In particular, the authors utilize the ALM to demonstrate that integrin/focal adhesion kinase (FAK)/Src signaling plays a role in cell migration as in amniote vertebrates.
Among amniotes, squamate reptiles are able to regenerate spinal cord, hyaline cartilage, axial muscle groups, and skin after tail loss. Lizards have evolved unique fracture planes in their caudal vertebrae to facilitate the process of autotomy, or self-amputation. Delorme et al. (2012) analyze the processes of wound healing and regeneration following autotomy at a fracture plane versus involuntary amputation elsewhere in the leopard gecko, Eublepharis macularius. Their findings indicate that regeneration is an intrinsic property of the tail, regardless of location (e.g., proximity to a fracture plane) or method of amputation. The authors also provide evidence of the activation of wound healing genes and isolated expression of a marker of apoptosis in the tail stump and regenerating tail.
The recent sequencing of the first nonavian reptile, the green anole lizard, A. carolinensis, promises to greatly advance molecular studies of lizard tail regeneration (Alföldi et al., 2011). The green anole has been a favorite model for studies of evolutionary genetics, neuroendocrinology, and behavioral ecology. There are also a number of studies describing the cellular and histological features of the regenerative process in this lizard species (Kamrin and Singer, 1955; Cox, 1968; Simpson, 1968; Maderson and Licht, 1968; Zika, 1969; Egar et al., 1970; Turner and Singer, 1973; Chlebowski et al., 1973; Alibardi, 1995a, 1995b). However, there are conflicting interpretations of these studies, many of which were carried out before stem cell and developmental concepts had been refined with the availability of molecular genetic approaches. In this issue, Fisher et al. (2012) take advantage of these advances to describe features of the regenerated A. carolinensis tail not previously appreciated. They identify irregularly spaced foramina that transmit the vasculature but not nerves in the regenerated cartilage tube. In addition, they present a detailed analysis of regenerated muscle bundles and show that they are quite different from those in the original tail. These muscles display unique tendinous attachments and a distribution of connective tissue not found in the original tail.
To complement the histological analysis of the regenerated tail of A. carolinensis, Ritzman et al. (2012) analyze the gross anatomy of the original and regenerated tail from a comparative and functional perspective. In the original tail, the extrinsic tail muscles, mm. caudofemoralis longus and brevis, are more restricted than other Anolis species, reflecting possible differences in locomotor performance. Muscle origins and insertions are also described and illustrated for the original and regenerated intrinsic musculature. The regenerated tail musculature is strikingly different, consisting of radially organized longitudinal myomeres of variable size, compared to the regularly spaced, interdigitating muscle segments, and intramuscular septa of the original tail. The functional anatomy of the regenerated tail suggests an appendage that is less capable of coordinated, fine-scale movements.
The studies in this special issue use diverse methods and levels of analysis to investigate regeneration in amphibians and reptiles. In particular, the availability of molecular sequences and reagents has led to advances in studies of regeneration in nonmammalian vertebrate species. With the rapidly decreasing costs of technologies such as RNA-Seq, which does not involve the high up-front investments required for microarrays, gene expression studies can be carried out on any of a number of species where genomic sequence is available. These studies represent the first step toward carrying out comparative mechanistic studies between vertebrate models of regeneration, to identify both conserved and species-specific mechanisms.
- 2011. The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals. Nature 477: 587–591. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .
- 1995a. Development of the axial cartilaginous skeleton in the regenerating tail of lizards. Bull Assoc Anat (Nancy) 79: 3–9. .
- 1995b. Muscle differentiation and morphogenesis in the regenerating tail of lizards. J Anat 186( Pt 1): 143–151. .
- 2010. Morphological and cellular aspects of tail and limb regeneration in lizards. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 207: 1–112. .
- 2003. Molecular pathways needed for regeneration of spinal cord and muscle in a vertebrate Dev Cell 5: 429–439. , , .
- 2011. Gene expression profile of the regeneration epithelium during axolotl limb regeneration. Dev Dyn 240: 1826–1840. , , , , , .
- 2012. Micro-computed tomography for visualizing limb skeletal regeneration in young Xenopus frogs. Anat Rec (Hoboken), in press. , , , , .
- 2006. Control of muscle regeneration in the Xenopus tadpole tail by Pax7. Development 133: 2303–2313. , , .
- 1973. Ultrastructural studies of lizard (Anolis carolinensis) myogenesis in vitro. Dev Biol 33: 80–99. , , .
- 1968. Some aspects of tail regeneration in the lizard, Anolis carolinensis: I. A description based on histology and autoradiography. J Exp Zool 171: 127–150. .
- 2012. Scar-free wound healing and regeneration following tail loss in the leopard gecko, Eublepharis macularius. Anat Rec (Hoboken), in press. , , .
- 1970. The growth and differentiation of the regenerating spinal cord of the lizard, Anolis carolinensis. J Morphol 131: 131–151. , , .
- 2012. A histological comparison of the original and regenerated tail in the green anole, Anolis carolinensis. Anat Rec (Hoboken), in press. , , , , , , , , .
- 2011. Tail regenerative capacity and iNOS immunolocalization in Xenopus laevis tadpoles. Cell Tissue Res 344: 261–269. , .
- 2004. Cell lineage tracing during Xenopus tail regeneration. Development 131: 2669–2679. , .
- 2005. Limb regeneration in higher vertebrates: developing a roadmap. Anat Rec 287B: 14–24. , , , , , .
- 2010. The genome of the Western clawed frog Xenopus tropicalis. Science 328: 633–636. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .
- 1974. Trapped fingers and amputated fingertips in children. J Pediatr Surg 9: 853–858. .
- International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium. 2004. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432: 695–716.
- 1955. The influence of the spinal cord in regeneration of the tail of the lizard, Anolis carolinensis. J Exp Zool 128: 611–627. , .
- 2012. The developing Xenopus limb as a model for studies on the balance between inflammation and regeneration. Anat Rec (Hoboken), in press. , , .
- 2009. Bioelectric mechanisms in regeneration: unique aspects and future perspectives. Semin Cell Dev Biol 20: 543–556. .
- 2012. Transgenic analysis of signaling pathways required for Xenopus tadpole spinal cord and muscle regeneration. Anat Rec (Hoboken), in press. , , .
- 2008. Requirement for Wnt and FGF signaling in Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration. Dev Biol 316: 323–335. , .
- 1968. Factors influencing rates of tail regeneration in the lizard Anolis carolinensis. Cell Mol Life Sci 24: 1083–1086. , .
- 2012. Early regulation of axolotl limb regeneration. Anat Rec (Hoboken), in press. , .
- 1999. Regeneration in higher vertebrates: limb buds and digit tips. Semin Cell Dev Biol 10: 405–413. , , , , , .
- 2011. Transient regenerative potential of the neonatal mouse heart. Science 331: 1078–1080. , , , , , , .
- 2010. Advances in understanding tissue regenerative capacity and mechanisms in animals. Nat Rev Genet 11: 710–721. .
- 2012. The gross anatomy of the original and regenerated tail in the green anole (Anolis carolinensis). Anat Rec (Hoboken), in press. , , , , , , , , , .
- 1968. Morphology of the regenerated spinal cord in the lizard, Anolis carolinensis. J Comp Neurol 134: 193–209. .
- 2000. Early development of Xenopus laevis: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. , , .
- 2008. The Xenopus tadpole: a new model for regeneration research. Cell Mol Life Sci 65: 54–63. , , .
- 2009. Considering the evolution of regeneration in the central nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 10: 713–723. , .
- 2012. Transducing bioelectric signals into epigenetic pathways during tadpole tail regeneration. Anat Rec (Hoboken), in press. , .
- 1973. Some morphological and ultrastructural changes in ependyma of amputation stump during early regeneration of tail in lizard, Anolis carolinensis. J Morphol 140: 257–269. , .
- 1969. A histological study of the regenerative response in a lizard, Anolis carolinensis. J Exp Zool 172: 1–9. .