The Interpretive Power of Infraorbital Foramen Area in Making Dietary Inferences in Extant Apes

Authors

  • Magdalena N. Muchlinski,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
    • Correspondence to: Magdalena N. Muchlinski, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, MN210 Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY 40536. Fax: 859-323-5946. E-mail: magdalena.muchlinski@uky.edu

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Andrew S. Deane

    1. Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
    Search for more papers by this author

ABSTRACT

The infraorbital foramen (IOF) is located below the orbit and transmits the sensory infraorbital nerve (ION) to mechanoreceptors located throughout the maxillary region. The size of the IOF correlates with the size of the ION; thus, the IOF appears to indicate relative touch sensitivity of maxillary region. In primates, IOF size correlates well with diet. Frugivores have relatively larger IOFs than folivores or insectivores because fruit handling/processing requires increased touch sensitivity. However, it is unknown if the IOF can be used to detect subtle dietary differences among closely related hominoid species. Hominoids are traditionally grouped into broad dietary categories, despite the fact that hominoid diets are remarkably diverse. This study examines whether relative IOF size is capable of differentiating among the dietary preferences of closely related species with overlapping, yet divergent diets. We measured IOF area in Hylobates lar, Symphalangus syndactulus, Pongo pygmaeus spp., Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Gorilla beringei graueri, and Gorilla beringei beringei. We classified each species as a dedicated folivore, mixed folivore/frugivore, soft object frugivore, or hard object frugivore. The IOF is documented to be larger in more frugivorous species and smaller in more folivorous taxa. Interestingly, G.b. beringei, had the largest relative IOF of any gorilla, despite being a dedicated folivore. G.b. beringei does have unique food processing behavior that relies heavily on maxillary mechanoreception, thus this finding is not entirely unsupported behaviorally. The results of this study provide evidence that the IOF is an informative feature in interpretations of fossil apes. Anat Rec, 297:1377–1384, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Ancillary