SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • killer whale;
  • Orcinus orca;
  • delphinid, cetacea;
  • brain;
  • MRI

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  4. RESULTS
  5. DISCUSSION
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. LITERATURE CITED

This article presents the first series of MRI-based anatomically labeled sectioned images of the brain of the killer whale (Orcinus orca). Magnetic resonance images of the brain of an adult killer whale were acquired in the coronal and axial planes. The gross morphology of the killer whale brain is comparable in some respects to that of other odontocete brains, including the unusual spatial arrangement of midbrain structures. There are also intriguing differences. Cerebral hemispheres appear extremely convoluted and, in contrast to smaller cetacean species, the killer whale brain possesses an exceptional degree of cortical elaboration in the insular cortex, temporal operculum, and the cortical limbic lobe. The functional and evolutionary implications of these features are discussed. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Compared with other mammalian brains, the cetacean brain is, in many respects, highly unusual. Morgane et al. (1980: p. 105) state that “the lobular formations in the dolphin brain are organized in a pattern fundamentally different from that seen in the brains of primates or carnivores.” As there is a 55–60 million year divergence between cetaceans and the phylogenetically closest group, the artiodactyls, odontocete brains represent a blend of early mammalian and uniquely derived features (Ridgway, 1986, 1990; Glezer et al., 1988; Manger et al., 1998). Differences between cetacean and other mammalian brains of similar size have been found in cytoarchitecture and histochemistry (Garey et al., 1985; Garey and Leuba, 1986; Glezer and Morgane, 1990; Glezer et al., 1990, 1992a, 1992b, 1993, 1998; Hof et al., 1992, 1995, 1999, 2000), cortical surface configuration (Jacobs et al., 1979; Morgane et al., 1980; Haug, 1987), and subcortical structural morphology (Tarpley and Ridgway, 1994; Glezer et al., 1995a, 1995b).

The brains of a few cetacean species, particularly the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus), have been studied relatively extensively. This is primarily due to the fact that bottlenose dolphins are popular in captivity and have been the focus of many long-term field studies. Therefore, much is known about their behavior, cognitive abilities, and social ecology. However, there is little neuroanatomical information on the brain of the largest Delphinid species, the killer whale (Orcinus orca), despite the fact that this species has also been studied in captivity and in the field quite extensively. The lack of information on killer whale brains is likely due to the difficulties associated with preparing and examining such a large brain (approximately 5,000 g). Yet understanding killer whale neuroanatomy is important because, like the bottlenose dolphin, killer whales show evidence of many complex and unusual social, communicative, and cognitive capacities. These include learning-based cooperative foraging strategies (Baird, 2000), cultural variation and transmission (Rendell and Whitehead, 2001; Yurk et al., 2002), and possibly mirror self-recognition (Delfour and Marten, 2001). Therefore, if we wish to understand the neurobiological basis of such abilities, we will need to further our understanding of the brains of killer whales.

A few studies address the size of the killer whale brain (Pilleri and Gihr, 1970; Marino, 1998, 2002) or a specific brain structure such as the corpus callosum (Tarpley and Ridgway, 1994). There are, however, no published descriptions of the basic neuroanatomy of the killer whale. In the present study, we present the first labeled sequential description of killer whale neuroanatomy. The findings are based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of a postmortem brain. As with previous MRI-based studies of other cetacean species (Marino et al., 2001a, 2001b, 2002, 2003a, 2003b), this method offers the opportunity to observe the internal structure of the brain with little or no distortion and with atlas-level precision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  4. RESULTS
  5. DISCUSSION
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. LITERATURE CITED

Specimen

The specimen is the postmortem brain of an adult male killer whale (Orcinus orca). The brain was obtained shortly after death of natural causes and was immersion-fixed in a large volume of 10% buffered formalin for an extended period of time.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Contiguous T2-weighted coronal and axial magnetic resonance images were acquired with a 1.5 T GE high-gradient MRI scanner equipped with 8.3 software at Mount Sinai School of Medicine. Coronal scans were acquired using TR = 500 msec and TE = 14.8 msec with an echo train of 2. Axial scans were acquired using TR = 700 and TE = 15 msec with an echo train of 2. Images are 2 mm thick with a matrix size of 512 × 512 and in-plane resolution of 32 × 32 cm yielding a voxel size of 0.63 × 0.63 × 2.0 mm. Data were transferred electronically to eFilm (v1.5.3, eFilm Medical, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) for offline processing.

Anatomical Labeling and Nomenclature

All identifiable anatomical structures of the dolphin brain were labeled in the coronal and axial plane images. The MR images of the killer whale brain were compared with the published photographs and illustrations of the bottlenose dolphin brain from Morgane et al. (1980) as well as published neuroanatomical atlases based on MRI scans of other adult odontocete brains (Marino et al., 2001a, 2001b, 2002, 2003a, 2003b). The labeling nomenclature follows that in the above sources.

RESULTS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  4. RESULTS
  5. DISCUSSION
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. LITERATURE CITED

General Morphology

Figures 1–10 display a rostral-to-caudal sequence of anatomically labeled originally acquired 2 mm thick coronal scans at 12 mm intervals. Figure 1 also includes an inset diagram of an odontocete brain showing the approximate orientation of coronal sections. Figures 11–18 display a ventral-to-dorsal sequence of anatomically labeled originally acquired 2 mm thick axial scans at 20 mm intervals. Figure 11 also includes an inset diagram of an odontocete brain showing the approximate orientation of horizontal sections. The figures show that the gross morphology of the killer whale brain is generally comparable to that of other odontocete brains (Morgane et al., 1980; Marino et al., 2001a, 2001b, 2002, 2003a, 2003b). The killer whale brain is characterized by extreme bitemporal width, as seen most clearly in Figures 3–10 and 14–18, and is apparently highly convoluted. The killer whale shares with other odontocetes a three-tiered arrangement of limbic, paralimbic, and supralimbic arcuate cortical lobules divided by deep limbic and paralimbic clefts (Figs. 9, 10, 17, and 18).

thumbnail image

Figure 1. Figures 1–10: Rostral-to-caudal sequence of anatomically labeled 2 mm thick coronal scans of the killer whale brain at 12 mm intervals. Section 13. L, left; R, right; A (inset), anterior.

Download figure to PowerPoint

thumbnail image

Figure 2. Section 19.

Download figure to PowerPoint

thumbnail image

Figure 3. Section 25.

Download figure to PowerPoint

thumbnail image

Figure 4. Section 31.

Download figure to PowerPoint

thumbnail image

Figure 5. Section 37.

Download figure to PowerPoint

thumbnail image

Figure 6. Section 43.

Download figure to PowerPoint

thumbnail image

Figure 7. Section 49.

Download figure to PowerPoint

thumbnail image

Figure 8. Section 55.

Download figure to PowerPoint

thumbnail image

Figure 9. Section 61.

Download figure to PowerPoint

thumbnail image

Figure 10. Section 67.

Download figure to PowerPoint

thumbnail image

Figure 11. Figures 11–18: Ventral-to-dorsal sequence of anatomically labeled 2 mm thick axial scans at 20 mm intervals. Section 10.

Download figure to PowerPoint

thumbnail image

Figure 12. Section 20.

Download figure to PowerPoint

thumbnail image

Figure 13. Section 30.

Download figure to PowerPoint

thumbnail image

Figure 14. Section 40.

Download figure to PowerPoint

thumbnail image

Figure 15. Section 50.

Download figure to PowerPoint

thumbnail image

Figure 16. Section 60.

Download figure to PowerPoint

thumbnail image

Figure 17. Section 70.

Download figure to PowerPoint

thumbnail image

Figure 18. Section 80.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Forebrain Anatomy

The most striking feature of the killer whale forebrain is the exceptional degree of cortical gyrification and sulcation, which is most apparent in Figures 3–10 and 15–18. Cortical complexity appears particularly extensive in the insular cortex (Figs. 4, 5, and 16), temporal operculum (Figs. 3 and 4), and the cortical limbic lobe (periarchicortical field above the corpus callosum and entorhinal cortex; Figs. 2–7, 16, and 17). An interesting corollary feature to the small limbic system is the striking development of this cortical limbic lobe in cetaceans (Oelschlager and Oelschlager, 2002; Marino et al., 2003b). The thalamus also appears massive (Figs. 3–5, 15, and 16).

Consistent with findings in other odontocetes (Marino et al., 2001a, 2001b, 2002, 2003a, 2003b), olfactory structures are absent in the killer whale brain and some limbic structures, particularly the hippocampus, are greatly reduced in size. In contrast, the amygdala appears well developed (Fig. 3). All features of the basal ganglia that are found in other mammals are present in killer whale and other odontocete brains, including the caudate (Figs. 2, 3, and 16), putamen (Figs. 15 and 16), pallidum (Figs. 2 and 16), and internal capsule (Figs. 15 and 16).

The corpus callosum appears relatively small with respect to the mass of the hemispheres (Figs. 3–6, 15, and 16) despite the highly elaborated adjacent limbic field. This observation is consistent with findings in other odontocetes (Marino et al., 2001a, 2001b, 2002, 2003a, 2003b).

Midbrain Anatomy

The killer whale brain demonstrates many of the proportions and spatial arrangements of midbrain structures found in other odontocetes. The tectum is well developed, particularly in the size of the inferior colliculus (Figs. 5, 13, and 14). As has been observed in other odontocetes (Marino et al., 2001a, 2002, 2003a, 2003b) and not in other mammals, the cerebral peduncle in the killer whale brain lies high on the lateral surface of the ventral midbrain (Fig. 3).

Hindbrain Anatomy

Figures 6 and 7 show the massive cerebellum in the killer whale brain as well as the narrow vermis relative to the cerebellar lobes. These features are typical of odontocetes (Marino et al., 2001a, 2001b, 2002, 2003a, 2003b).

DISCUSSION

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  4. RESULTS
  5. DISCUSSION
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. LITERATURE CITED

This article presents the first series of MRI-based anatomically labeled images of the brain of the killer whale. These images allow for the visualizing of the distinctive features of the brain of this species from two orientations by preserving the gross morphological and internal structure of the specimen.

Although a quantitative assessment was not made, the killer whale cerebral hemispheres appear more highly convoluted, possessing more surface area, than those of smaller species within the same family of delphinids such as the bottlenose dolphin (Marino et al., 2001a) and the common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) (Marino et al., 2002). The killer whale brain is also approximately 3.5 and 6.5 times more massive than that of the bottlenose dolphin and common dolphin brains, respectively. This pattern is consistent with Ridgway and Brownson (1984), who found a positive relationship between surface area and brain weight among odontocetes, including the killer whale, bottlenose dolphin, and common dolphin. Therefore, elaboration of cortical structures may represent the influence of scaling factors but quantitative assessments should be made to determine if nonscaling factors partially contribute to the variance. Additionally, although scaling factors may play a large role in accounting for the variance in cortex (or other brain structures for that matter), it is likely that there are real information processing consequences associated with increased convolutions of the cortex and other such scaling features in the brain.

The corpus callosum is an apparently relatively small structure in the killer whale brain. This observation is consistent with findings that corpus callosum midsagittal area in delphinids is considerably smaller in relation to brain mass than in other mammals and that dolphins with larger brains possessed relatively smaller corpora callosa (Tarpley and Ridgway, 1994). The inverse relationship between corpus callosum size and the size of the hemispheres is likely due to trade-offs between conduction velocities and brain metabolism (Shultz et al., personal communication).

The unusual lateral spatial position of the cerebral peduncle in the midbrain has been noted in other odontocetes. It has been hypothesized that this arrangement is not only unique to cetaceans but due to the distinctive flexed posture of the midbrain in adult cetaceans (Marino et al., 2001a, 2002, 2003a, 2003b; Johnson et al., 2003). The proportions of the cerebellum in the killer whale brain are consistent with those in other odontocetes (Marino et al., 2001a, 2001b, 2002, 2003a, 2003b) as well as with the quantitative finding that the cerebellum makes up a significantly larger portion of the total brain mass in cetaceans than in primates (Marino et al., 2000).

The killer whale brain appears extremely elaborated in the insular cortex, surrounding operculum, and limbic lobe. The extremely well-developed limbic lobe is an interesting corollary feature to the small hippocampus. This finding is consistent with observations in other odontocetes (Morgane et al., 1980; Oelschlager and Oelschlager, 2002; Marino et al., 2003b) and is interesting in light of the fact that killer whales exhibit highly sophisticated ranging and distribution patterns that depend heavily on spatial memory skills (Baird, 2000). This juxtaposition of a vastly reduced archicortex and a highly elaborated periarchicortical zone leads to interesting questions about whether there was a transfer of hippocampus-like functions to other cortical, including periarchicortical, regions.

Finally, extreme development in the insular cortex and surrounding temporal operculum in the killer whale is intriguing. The insula mediates viscerosensation, gustation, and some somatosensation in most mammals. In humans, the frontal operculum is involved in speech. The topographical arrangement of cortical maps in cetaceans is very different from other mammals (Lende and Welker, 1972; Sokolov et al., 1972; Ladygina et al., 1978; Supin et al., 1978) and it remains a possibility that the insula and surrounding operculum are serving an entirely different purpose in the killer whale than in other mammals. However, one conjecture put forth by Morgane et al. (1980) suggests that, on the basis of architectonic evidence, the operculum may cortically represent trigeminal (rostrum) and glossopharyngeal (nasal respiratory tract) innervation. Given the fact that various sounds are modified by structures associated with the control of air flow through the nasal region, it is a speculative but not altogether unreasonable possibility that the cetacean operculum could serve a similar function as the speech-related opercular cortex in humans. In general, it would not be surprising to find that there are adaptive features of the killer whale brain associated with the evolution of complex communicative abilities given the highly complex social structure of this species (Baird, 2000; Rendell and Whitehead, 2001; Yurk et al 2002). Others have suggested that the insular region surrounded by the operculum is related to specializations of the auditory cortex (Manger et al., 1998), though audition is obviously closely tied to communication. What is clear, however, is that because of its elaboration, the temporal opercular region of the killer whale and other odontocete brains should be the target of extensive future study.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  4. RESULTS
  5. DISCUSSION
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. LITERATURE CITED

The authors thank Ilya I. Glezer and Peter J. Morgane for their generous donation of the specimen, John I. Johnson for advice and assistance with neuroanatomical identifications, and John C. Gentile for MRI technical assistance.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  4. RESULTS
  5. DISCUSSION
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. LITERATURE CITED
  • Baird RW. 2000. The killer whale-foraging specializations and group hunting. In: MannJ, ConnorRC, TyackPL, WhiteheadH, editors. Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p 127153.
  • Delfour F, Marten K. 2001. Mirror image processing in three marine mammal species: killer whales (Orcinus orca), false killer whales (Pseudorca crassidens) and California sea lions (Zalophus californianus). Behav Proc 53: 181190.
  • Garey LJ, Winkelman E, Brauer K. 1985. Golgi and Nissl studies of the visual cortex of the bottlenose dolphin. J Comp Neurol 240: 305321.
  • Garey LJ, Leuba G. 1986. A quantitative study of neuronal and glial numerical density in the visual cortex of the bottlenose dolphin: evidence for a specialized subarea and changes with age. J Comp Neurol 247: 491496.
  • Glezer II, Jacobs M, Morgane P. 1988. Implications of the “initial brain” concept for brain evolution in Cetacea. Behav Brain Sci 11: 75116.
  • Glezer II, Morgane PJ. 1990. Ultrastucture of synapse and golgi analysis of neurons in neocortex of the lateral gyrus (visual cortex) of the dolphin and pilot whale. Brain Res Bull 24: 401427.
  • Glezer II, Morgane PJ, Leranth C. 1990. Immunohistochemistry of neurotransmitters in visual cortex of several toothed whales: light and electron microscopic study. In: ThomasJA, KasteleinRA, editors. Sensory abilities of cetaceans: laboratory and field evidence. New York: Plenum Press. p 3960.
  • Glezer II, Hof PR, Leranth C, Morgane PJ. 1992a. Morphological and histological features of odontocete visual neocortex: immunocytochemical analysis of pyramidal and nonpyramidal populations of neurons. In: ThomasJA, KasteleinRA, SupinYa, editors. Marine mammal sensory systems. New York: Plenum Press. p 138.
  • Glezer II, Hof PR, Morgane PJ. 1992b. Calretinin-immunoreactive neurons in the primary visual cortex of dolphin and human brains. Brain Res 595: 181188.
  • Glezer II, Hof PR, Leranth C, Morgane PJ. 1993. Calcium-binding protein-containing neuronal populations in mammalian visual cortex: a comparative study in whales, insectivores, bats, rodents, and primates. Cerebral Cortex 3: 249272.
  • Glezer II, Hof PR, Istomin VV, Morgane PJ. 1995a. Comparative immunocytochemistry of calcium-binding protein-positive neurons in visual and auditory systems of cetacean and primate brains. In: KasteleinRA, ThomasJA, NachtigallPE, editors. Sensory systems of aquatic mammals. Woerden, The Netherlands: De Spil Publishers. p 477513.
  • Glezer II, Hof PR, Morgane PJ. 1995b. Cytoarchitectonics and immunocytochemistry of the inferior colliculus of midbrains in cetaceans. FASEB J 9: A247A247.
  • Glezer II, Hof PR, Morgane PJ. 1998. Comparative analysis of calcium-binding protein-immunoreactive neuronal populations in the auditory and visual systems of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and the macaque monkey (Macaca fascicularis). J Chem Neuro 15: 203237.
  • Haug H. 1987. Brain sizes, surfaces and neuronal sizes of the cortex cerebri: a stereological investigation of man and his variability and a comparison with some mammals (primates, whales, marsupialia, insectivores and one elephant). Am J Anat 180: 126142.
  • Hof PR, Glezer II, Archin N, Janssen WG, Morgane PJ, Morrison JH. 1992. The primary auditory cortex in cetacean and human brain: a comparative analysis of neurofilament protein-containing pyramidal neurons. Neurosci Lett 146: 9195.
  • Hof PR, Glezer II, Revishchin AV, Bouras C, Charnay Y, Morgane PJ. 1995. Distribution of dopaminergic fibers and neurons in visual and auditory cortices of the harbor porpoise and pilot whale. Brain Res Bull 36: 275284.
  • Hof PR, Glezer II, Conde' F, Flagg RA, Rubin MB, Nimchinsky EA, Vogt Weisenhorn DM. 1999. Cellular distribution of the calcium-binding proteins parvalbumin, calbindin, and calretinin in the neocortex of mammals: phylogenetic and developmental patterns. J Chem Neuroanat 16: 77116.
  • Hof PR, Glezer II, Nimchinsky EA, Erwin JM. 2000. Neurochemical and cellular specializations in the mammalian neocortex reflect phylogenetic relationships: evidence from primates, cetaceans, and artiodactyls. Brain Beh Evol 55: 300310.
  • Jacobs MS, McFarland WL, Morgane PJ. 1979. The anatomy of the brain of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): rhinic lobe (rhinencephalon): the archicortex. Brain Res Bull 4 (Suppl 1): 1108.
  • Johnson JI, Switzer RC III, Sudheimer KD, Ferreira FM, Fobbs AJ Jr, Marino L. 2003. Lateralized cerebral peduncles, extensive midbrain pallidum, and other distinctive features of the midbrain of whales and dolphins. Toronto: Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology Meeting.
  • Ladygina TF, Mass AM, Supin Ya. 1978. Multiple sensory projections in the dolphin cerebral cortex. Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat 28: 10471054.
  • Lende RA, Welker WI. 1972. An unusual sensory area in the cerebral neocortex of the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus. Brain Res 45: 555560.
  • Manger P, Sum M, Szymanski M, Ridgway S, Krubitzer L. 1998. Modular subdivisions of dolphin insular cortex: does evolutionary history repeat itself? J Cog Neurosci 10: 153166.
  • Marino L. 1998. A comparison of encephalization levels between adult anthropoid primates and odontocetes (toothed whales). Brain Beh Evol 51: 230238.
  • Marino L, Rilling JK, Lin SK, Ridgway SH. 2000. Relative volume of the cerebellum in the bottlenose dolphin and comparison with anthropoid primates. Brain Beh Evol 56: 204211.
  • Marino L, Sudheimer K, Murphy TL, Davis KK, Pabst DA, McLellan WA, Rilling JK, Johnson JI. 2001a. Anatomy and three-dimensional reconstructions of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) brain from magnetic resonance images. Anat Rec 264: 397414.
  • Marino L, Murphy TL, DeWeerd AL, Morris JA, Fobbs AJ, Humblot N, Ridgway SH, Johnson JI. 2001b. Anatomy and three-dimensional reconstructions of the brain of the white whale (Delphinapterus leucas) from magnetic resonance images. Anat Rec 262: 429439.
  • Marino L. 2002. Brain size evolution. In: PerrinWF, WursigB, ThewissenH, editors. Encyclopedia of marine mammals. San Diego: Academic Press. p 158162.
  • Marino L, Sudheimer K, Pabst DA, McLellan WA, Filsoof D, Johnson JI. 2002. Neuroanatomy of the common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) as revealed by magnetic resonance images (MRI). Anat Rec 268: 411429.
  • Marino L, Pabst DA, McLellan WA, Sudheimer K, Johnson JI. 2003a. Magnetic resonance images of the brain of a dwarf sperm whale (Kogia simus). J Anat 204: 5776.
  • Marino L, Sudheimer K, Sarko D, Sirpenski G, Johnson JI. 2003b. Neuroanatomy of the harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) from magnetic resonance images. J Morph 257: 308347.
  • Morgane PJ, Jacobs MS, MacFarland WL. 1980. The anatomy of the brain of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): surface configurations of the telencephalon of the bottlenose dolphin with comparative anatomical observations in four other cetacean species. Brain Res Bull 5 (Suppl 3): 1107.
  • Oelschlager HA, Oelschlager JS. 2002. Brains. In: PerrinWF, WursigB, ThewissenH, editors. Encyclopedia of marine mammals. San Diego: Academic Press. p 133158.
  • Pilleri G, Gihr M. 1970. The central nervous system of the mysticete and odontocete whales. Invest Cetacea 2: 87135.
  • Rendell L, Whitehead H. 2001. Culture in whales and dolphins. Beh Brain Sci 24: 309382.
  • Ridgway SH, Brownson RH. 1984. Relative brain sizes and cortical surface areas in odontocetes. Acta Zool Fennica 172: 149152.
  • Ridgway SH. 1986. Physiological observations on dolphin brains. In: SchustermanRJ, ThomasJA, WoodFG, editors. Dolphin cognition and behavior: a comparative approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p 3160.
  • Ridgway SH. 1990. The central nervous system of the bottlenose dolphin. In: LeatherwoodS, ReevesR, editors. The bottlenose dolphin. San Diego: Academic Press. p 6997.
  • Sokolov VE, Ladygina TF, Supin YA. 1972. Localization of sensory zones in the dolphin's cerebral cortex. Dok Akad Nauk SSSR 202: 490493.
  • Supin Ya, Mukhametov LM, Ladygina TF, Popov VV, Mass AM, Poljakova IG. 1978. Electrophysiological studies of the dolphin's brain. Moscow: Izdatel'ato Nauka.
  • Tarpley RL, Ridgway SH. 1994. Corpus callosum size in delphinid cetaceans. Brain Beh Evol 44: 156165.
  • Yurk H, Barrett-Lennard L, Ford JKB, Matkin CO. 2002. Cultural transmission within maternal lineages: vocal clans in resident killer whales in southern Alaska. Anim Beh 63: 11031119.