SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Alvesalo L, Tammisalo E. 1981. Enamel thickness in 45 X females permanent teeth. Am J Hum Genet 33: 464469.
  • Alvesalo L. 1985. Dental growth in 47 XYY males and in conditions with other sex-chromosome anomolies. In: SandbergAA, editor. The Y chromosome. New York: Alan R. Liss. p 277300.
  • Alvesalo L, Tammisalo E, Hakola P. 1985. Enamel thickness in 47 XYY males' permanent teeth. Ann Hum Biol 12: 421427.
  • Alvesalo L, Tammisalo E, Therman E. 1987. 47 XYY females, sex chromosomes, and tooth crown structures. Hum Genet 7: 345348.
  • Avishai G, Müller R, Gabet Y, Bab I, Zilberman U, Smith P. 2004. New approach to quantifying developmental variation in the dentition using serial microtomographic imaging. Microsc Res Tech 65: 263269.
  • Balto K, Müller R, Carrington DC, Dobeck J, Stashenko P. 2000. Quantification of periapical bone destruction in mice by micro-computed tomography. J Dent Res 79: 3540.
  • Baum G, Greenwood I, Smirnow R. 1963. Observation of internal structures of tooth by ultrasonography. Science 139: 495496.
  • Beynon AD, Wood BA. 1986. Variations in enamel thickness and structure in East African hominids. Am J Phys Anthropol 70: 177193.
  • Beynon AD, Dean MC, Reid DJ. 1991. On thick and thin enamel in hominoids. Am J Phys Anthropol 86: 295309.
  • Bonse U, Busch F, Gunnewig O, Beckmann F, Pahl R, Delling G, Hahn M, Graeff W. 1994. 3D computed X-ray tomography of human cancellous bone at 8 μm spatial and 10−4 energy resolution. Bone Miner 25: 2538.
  • Brunet M, Guy F, Pilbeam D, Mackaye HT, Likius A, Ahounta D, Beauvilain A, Blondel C, Bocherens H, Boisserie JR, De Bonis L, Coppens Y, Dejax J, Denys C, Duringer P, Eisenmann VR, Fanone G, Fronty P, Geraads D, Lehmann T, Lihoreau F, Louchart A, Mahamat A, Merceron G, Mouchelin G, Otero O, Campomanes PP, De Leon MP, Rage JC, Sapanet M, Schuster M, Sudre J, Tassy P, Valentin X, Vignaud P, Viriot L, Zazzo A, Zollikofer C. 2002. A new hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad, Central Africa. Nature 418: 145151.
  • Bush EC, Simons EL, Allman JM. 2004. High-resolution computed tomography study of the cranium of a fossil anthropoid primate, Parapithecus grangeri: new insights into the evolutionary history of primate sensory systems. Anat Rec A 281A: 10831087.
  • Chaimanee Y, Jolly D, Benammi M, Tafforeau P, Duzer D, Moussa I, Jaeger JJ. 2003. A Middle Miocene hominoid from Thailand and orangutan origins. Nature 422: 6165.
  • Conroy GC. 1991. Enamel thickness in South African australopithecines: noninvasive evaluation by computed tomography. Paleont Afr 28: 5359.
  • Conroy GC, Vanier MW. 1991. Noninvasive evaluation of enamel thickness and volume in South African australopithecines by computed tomography. Am J Phys Anthropol 12(Suppl): 60.
  • Conroy GC, Lichtman JW, Martin LB. 1995. Some observations on enamel thickness and enamel prism packing in the Miocene hominoid Otavipithecus namibiensis. Am J Phys Anthropol 98: 595600.
  • Cooper DML, Matyas JR, Katzenberg MA, Hallgrimsson B. 2004. Comparison of microcomputed tomographic and microradiographic measurements of cortical bone porosity. Calcif Tiss Int 74: 437447.
  • Dauphin Y. 1987. Some results on the dental enamel structure in fossil and recent reptiles. CR Acad Sci II 305: 12171219.
  • De Kock MO, Beukes NJ, Hancox PJ, Kirshvink JL, Rubidge BS, Ward PD. 2003. Permian-Triassic megnetostratigraphy in the Karoo Basin of South Africa. Geochem Cosmochim Acta 67: A77A78.
  • Delson E. 1984. Cercopithecid biochronology of the African Plio-Pleistocene: correlation among eastern and southern hominid-bearing localities. Cour Forsch Inst Senckenberg 69: 199218.
  • Delson E. 1988. Chronology of South African australopith site units. In: GrineFE, editor. Evolutionary history of the “robust” Australopithecines. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. p 317324.
  • Dumont ER. 1995. Enamel thickness and dietary adaptation among extant primates and chiropterans. J Mammal 76: 11271136.
  • Durand EP, Rüegsegger P. 1991. Cancellous bone structure: analysis of high-resolution CT images with run-length method. J Comp Assist Tomogr 15: 133139.
  • Faerman M, Kharitonov VM, Batsevich V, Zilberman U, Smith P. 1994. A Neanderthal infant from the Barakai Cave, western Caucasus. J Hum Evol 27: 405415.
  • Fajardo RJ, Müller R. 2001. Three-dimensional analysis of non-human primate trabecular architecture using micro-computed tomography. Am J Phys Anthropol 115: 327336.
  • Fajardo RJ, Ryan TM, Kappelman J. 2002. Assessing the accuracy of high-resolution X-ray computed tomography of primate trabecular bone by comparison with histological sections. Am J Phys Anthropol 118: 110.
  • Gantt DG. 1983. The enamel of Neogene hominoids: structual and phyletic implications. In: CiochonRL, CorrucciniRS, editors. New interpretations of ape and human ancestry. New York: Plenum Press. p 249298.
  • Gantt DG, Kappleman J, Ketcham RA, Alder ME, Deahl TH. 2003. 3D approach to interpret enamel thickness and volume. Am J Phys Anthropol 36(Suppl): 99.
  • Grine FE, Vrba ES, Cruickshank ARI. 1979. Enamel prisms and diphydonty: linked apomorphies of Mammalia. S Afr J Sci 75: 114120.
  • Grine FE, Martin L. 1988. Enamel thickness and development in Australopithecus and Paranthropus. In: GrineFE, editor. Evolutionary history of the “robust” Australopithecines. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. p 342.
  • Grine FE. 1991. Computed tomography and the measurement of enamel thickness in extant hominoids: implications for its paleontological application. Palaeont Afr 28: 6169.
  • Grine FE, Stevens NJ, Jungers WL. 2001. An evaluation of dental radiograph accuracy in the measurement of enamel thickness. Archs Oral Biol 46: 11171125.
  • Grine FE. 2002. Scaling of tooth enamel thickness, and molar crown size reduction in modern humans. S Afr J Sci 98: 503509.
  • Grine FE. 2004. Geographic variation in tooth enamel thickness does not support Neandertal involvement in the ancestry of modern Europeans. S Afr J Sci 100: 389394.
  • Grine FE. 2005. Enamel thickness of deciduous and permanent molars in modern Homo sapiens. Am J Phys Anthropol 126: 1431.
  • Grine FE, Spencer MA, Demes AB, Smith HF, Strait DS, Constant DA. 2005. Molar enamel thickness in the Chacma baboon, Papio ursinus. Am J Phys Anthropol 128: 812822.
  • Gron P. 1960. A geometrical evaluation of image size in dental radiography. J Dent Res 39: 289301.
  • Haile-Selassie Y. 2001. Late Miocene hominids from the Middle Awash, Ethiopia. Nature 412: 178181.
  • Haile-Selassie Y, Suwa G, White TD. 2004. Late Miocene teeth from Middle Awash, Ethiopia, and early hominid dental evolution. Science 303: 15031505.
  • Hancox PJ, Rubidge BS. 2001. Breakthroughs in the biodiversity, biogeography, biostratigraphy, and basin analysis of the Beaufort group. J Afr Earth Sci 33: 563577.
  • Harris EF, Hicks JD. 1998. Enamel thickness in maxillary human incisors: a radiographic assessment. Archs Oral Biol 43: 825831.
  • Harris EF, Hicks JD, Barcroft BD. 1999. Absence of sexual dimorphism in enamel thickness of human deciduous molars. In: MayhallJT, HeikkinenT, editors. Dental morphology. Oulu, Finland: Oulu University Press. p 338349.
  • Hildebrand T, Laib A, Müller R, Dequekker J, Rüegsegger P. 1999. Direct three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus. J Bone Miner Res 14: 11671174.
  • Kappelman J. 1998. Advances in three-dimensional data acquisition and analysis. In: RosenbergerAL, FleagleJG, McHenryHM, StrasserE, editors. Primate locomotion. New York: Plenum. p 205222.
  • Kay RF. 1981. The nut-crackers: a new theory of the adaptations of the Ramapithecinae. Am J Phys Anthropol 55: 141151.
  • Khera SC, Carpenter CW, Vetter JD, Staley RN. 1990. Anatomy of cusps of posterior teeth and their fracture potential. J Prosthet Dent 64: 139147.
  • Kinney JH, Ryaby JT, Haupt DL, Lane NE. 1998. Three-dimensional in vivo morphometry of trabecular bone in the OVX rat model of osteoporosis. Technol Health Care 6: 339350.
  • Kono RT, Suwa G, Tanijiri T. 2002. A three-dimensional analysis of enamel distribution patterns in human permanent first molars. Archs Oral Biol 47: 867875.
  • Kono R. 2004. Molar enamel thickness and distribution patterns in extant great apes and humans: new insights based on a 3-dimensional whole crown perspective. Anthropol Sci 112: 121146.
  • Kono-Takeuchi R, Suwa G, Kanazawa E, Tanijiri T. 1997. A new method of evaluating enamel thickness based on a three-dimensional measuring system. Anthropol Sci 105: 217229.
  • Kuhn JL, Goldstein SA, Feldkamp LA, Goulet RW, Jesion G. 1990. Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure. J Orthoped Res 8: 833842.
  • Lees S. 1968. Specific acoustic impedence of enamel and dentine. Archs Oral Biol 13: 14911500.
  • Lees S, Barber FE. 1968. Looking into teeth with ultrasound. Science 161: 477.
  • Lees S. 1971. Ultrasonics in hard dental tissues. Int Dent J 21: 403417.
  • Lucas SG. 1995. Towards dicynodont biochronology. Albertina 16: 3340.
  • Macho GA, Thackeray JF. 1992. Computed-tomography and enamel thickness of maxillary molars of Plio-Pleistocene hominids from Sterkfontein, Swartkrans, and Kromdraai (South-Africa): an exploratory study. Am J Phys Anthropol 89: 133143.
  • Macho GA, Berner ME. 1993. Enamel thickness of human maxillary molars reconsidered. Am J Phys Anthropol 92: 189200.
  • Macho GA, Spears IR. 1999. Effects of loading on the biochemical behavior of molars of Homo, Pan, and Pongo. Am J Phys Anthropol 109: 211227.
  • MacLatchy L, Müller R. 2002. A comparison of the femoral head and neck trabecular architecture of Galago and Perodicticus using micro-computed tomography (μCT). J Hum Evol 43: 89105.
  • Maev RG, Maximovskye YM, Denisova LA, Maeva EY, Denissov AA, Chrkova TD, Domyshev DA. 2000. Acoustic microscopy: a new method for investigation of dental tissues. Stomatology 79: 1419.
  • Maev RG, Denisova LA, Maeva EY, Denissov AA. 2002. New data on histology and physico-mechanical properties of human tooth tissue obtained with acoustic microscopy. Ultrasound Med Biol 28: 131136.
  • Martin LB. 1985. Significance of enamel thickness in hominoid evolution. Nature 314: 260263.
  • Martin LB, Olejniczak AJ, Maas MC. 2003. Enamel thickness and microstructure in pitheciin primates, with comments on dietary adaptations of the middle Miocene hominoid Kenyapithecus. J Hum Evol 45: 351367.
  • McErlain DD, Chhem RK, Bohay RN, Holdsworth DW. 2004. Micro-computed tomography of a 500-year-old tooth: technical note. J Assoc Canad Radiol 55: 242245.
  • Mezava S, Kawato T, Yoshida K, Nozaki H, Saito T, Tomura K, Onozava M. 1999. Evaluation of human tooth structure with the ultrasonic imaging technique. J Oral Sci 41: 191197.
  • Miller GS. 1918. The Piltdown jaw. Am J Phys Anthropol 1: 2552.
  • Molnar S, Gantt DG. 1977. Functional implications of primate enamel thickness. Am J Phys Anthropol 46: 447454.
  • Molnar S, Hildebolt C, Molnar IM, Radovcic J, Gravier M. 1993. Hominid enamel thickness: I, the Krapina Neandertals. Am J Phys Anthropol 92: 131138.
  • Müller R. 2002. The Zürich experience: one decade of three-dimensional high-resolution computed tomography. Topics Magnet Resonance Imag 13: 307322.
  • Müller R. 2003. Bone microarcitecture assessment: current and future trends. Osteoporos Int 14: 8999.
  • Müller R, Koller B, Hildebrand T, Laib A, Gionollini S, Rüegsegger P. 1996a. Resolution dependency of microstructural properties of cancellous bone based on three-dimensional μ-tomography. Technol Health Care 4: 113119.
  • Müller R, Hahn M, Vogel M, Delling G, Rüegsegger P. 1996b. Morphometric analysis of noninvasively assessed bone biopsies: comparison of high-resolution computed tomography and histologic sections. Bone 18: 215220.
  • Müller R, Rüegsegger P. 1997. Micro-tomographic imaging for the nondestructive evaluation of trabecular bone architecture. In: MeunierA, editor. Bone research in biomechanics. Amsterdam: IOS Press. p 6179.
  • Müller R, van Campenhout H, Van Damme B, Van der Perre G, Dequeker J, Hildebrand T, Rüegsegger P. 1998. Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: a quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography. Bone 23: 5966.
  • Nagatoshi K. 1990. Molar enamel thickness in European Miocene and extant Hominoidea. Int J Primatol 11: 283295.
  • Olejniczak AJ, Grine FE. 2005. High resolution measurement of Neandertal tooth enamel thickness by micro-focal computed tomography. S Afr J Sci 101: 219220.
  • Peck SD, Rowe JM, Briggs GAD. 1989. Studies on sound and carious enamel with the quantitative acoustic microscope. J Dent Res 68: 107112.
  • Peters OA, Laib A, Rüegsegger P, Barbakow F. 2000. Three-dimensional analysis of root canal geometry by high-resolution computed tomography. J Dent Res 79: 14051409.
  • Rhodes JS, Pitt-Ford TR, Lynch JA, Liepins PJ, Curtis RV. 1999. Micro-computed tomography: a new tool for experimental endodontology. Int Endodont J 32: 165170.
  • Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O. 2004. OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digital Imag 17: 205216.
  • Rubidge BS. 2006. Re-uniting lost continents: fossil reptiles from the ancient Karoo and their wanderlust. S Afr J Geol (in press).
  • Rüegsegger P, Koller B, Müller R. 1996. A microtomographic system for the non-destructive evaluation of bone architecture. Calcif Tissue Int 58: 2429.
  • Sato I, Shimada K, Handal JC, Lance V, Gasser RF. 1988. Morphology of the American alligator (Alligator mississipiensis) tooth: I, the fine-structure and analysis of the enamel. Am Zool 28: A78.
  • Schillingburg HT, Grace CS. 1973. Thickness of enamel and dentine. J S Calif Dent Assoc 41: 3352.
  • Schwartz GT, Thackeray JF, Reid C, van Reenan JF. 1998. Enamel thickness and the topography of the enamel-dentine junction in South African Plio-Pleistocene hominids with special reference to the Carabelli trait. J Hum Evol 35: 523542.
  • Schwartz GT. 2000a. Enamel thickness and the helicoidal wear plane in modern human mandibular molars. Archs Oral Biol 45: 401409.
  • Schwartz GT. 2000b. Taxonomic and functional aspects of the patterning of enamel thickness distribution in extant large-bodied hominoids. Am J Phys Anthropol 111: 221244.
  • Senut B, Pickford M, Gommery D, Mein P, Cheboi K, Coppens Y. 2001. First hominid from the Miocene (Lukeino Formation, Kenya). CR Acad Sci Ser II A 332: 137144.
  • Shellis RP, Beynon AD, Reid DJ, Hiiemae KM. 1998. Variations in molar enamel thickness among primates. J Hum Evol 35: 507522.
  • Simons EL, Pilbeam D. 1972. Hominiod paleoprimatology. In: TuttleR, editor. The functional and evolutionary biology of primates. Chicago: Aldine. p 3662.
  • Smith P, Zilberman U. 1994. Thin enamel and other tooth components in Neanderthals and other hominids. Am J Phys Anthropol 95: 8587.
  • Smith RMH, Keyser AW. 1995. Biostratigraphy of the Tapinocephalus assemblage zone. In: RubidgeBS, editor. SACS biostratigraphic series no 1. Pretoria: Council for Geoscience. p 817.
  • Spears IR, Macho GA. 1998. Biomechanical behaviour of modern human molars: implications for interpreting the fossil record. Am J Phys Anthropol 106: 467482.
  • Sperber GH. 1985. Comparative primate dental enamel thickness. In: TobiasPV, editor. Hominid evolution: past, present, and future. New York: Alan R. Liss. p 443454.
  • Sperber GH. 1986. Palaeodontology: radiographic revelations of the Australopithecinae. In: SingerR, LundyJK, editors. Variation, culture, and evolution in African populations. Johannesburg, South Africa: Witwatersrand University Press. p 195207.
  • Spoor CF, Zonneveld FW, Macho GA. 1993. Linear measurements of cortical bone and dental enamel by computed-tomography: applications and problems. Am J Phys Anthropol 91: 469484.
  • Strait DS, Grine FE, Moniz MA. 1997. A reappraisal of early hominid phylogeny. J Hum Evol 32: 1782.
  • Strait DS, Grine FE. 2001. The systematics of Australopithecus garhi. Ludus Vitalis 9: 109135.
  • Strait DS, Grine FE. 2004. Inferring hominoid and early hominid phylogeny using craniodental characters: the role of fossil taxa. J Hum Evol 47: 399452.
  • Stroud JL, Buschang PH, Goaz PW. 1994. Sexual dimorphism in mesiodistal dentine and enamel thickness. Dent-Max-Fac Radiol 23: 169171.
  • Stroud JL, English J, Buschang PH. 1998. Enamel thickness of the posterior dentition: its implications for nonextraction treatment. Angle Orthod 68: 141146.
  • Tafforeau, P. 2004. Aspects phylogénétiques et fonctionnels de la microstructure de l'émail dentaire et de la structure tridimensionnelle des molaires chez les primates fossils et actuels: apports de la microtomographie é rayonnement X synchrotron. PhD thesis. Montpellier: Université de Montpellier II.
  • Tafforeau P, Boistel R, Boller E, Bravin A, Brunet M, Chaimanee Y, Cloetens P, Feist M, Hoszowska J, Jaeger J-J, Kay RF, Lazzari V, Marivaux L, Nel A, Nemoz C, Thibault X, Vignaud P, Zabler S. 2006. Applications of X-Ray synchotron microtomography for non-destructive studies of paleontological specimens. Appl Phys A (in press).
  • von Stechow D, Balto K, Stashenko P, Müller R. 2003. Three-dimensional quantitation of periradicular bone destruction by micro-computed tomography. J Endodont 29: 252256.
  • White TD, Suwa G, Asfaw B. 1994. Australopithecus ramidus, a new species of early hominid from Aramis, Ethiopia. Nature 371: 306312.
  • Witmer LM, Chatterjee S, Franzosa J, Rowe T. 2003. Neuroanatomy of flying reptiles and implications for flight, posture, and behavior. Nature 425: 950953.
  • Wolpoff MH, Senut B, Pickford M, Hawks J. 2002. Sahelanthropus or “Sahelpithecus”? Nature 419: 581582.
  • Yang Z. 1991. Ultrasound surface imaging and the measurement of tooth enamel thickness. PhD dissertation. Manchester: University of Manchester.
  • Yang Z. 1996. Tooth enamel surface imaging measurement by ultrasound imaging method. J Acoust Soc Am 100: 2710.
  • Zilberman U, Smith P, Sperber GH. 1990. Components of australopithecine teeth, a radiographic study. J Hum Evol 5: 515529.
  • Zilberman U, Smith P. 1992a. A comparison of tooth structure in Neanderthals and early Homo sapiens sapiens: a radiographic study. J Anat 180: 387393.
  • Zilberman U, Smith P. 1992b. Evolutionary trends in hominid tooth components: a radiographic study. In: SmithP, TchernovE, editors. Structure, function, and evolution of teeth. London: Freund. p 349359.
  • Zilberman U, Skinner M, Smith P. 1992. Tooth components of mandibular deciduous molars of Homo sapiens sapiens and Homo sapiens neanderthalensis: a radiographic study. Am J Phys Anthropol 87: 255262.
  • Zilberman U, Smith P. 1994. Sex discrimination using tooth components measured from bite-wing radiographs. Am J Phys Anthropol S18: 214.
  • Zonneveld FW, Wind J. 1985. High resolution computed tomography of fossil hominid skulls: a new method and some results. In: TobiasPV, editor. Hominid evolution: past, present, and future. New York: Alan R. Liss. p 427436.