Feature Article

You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article

Microsmatic primates: Reconsidering how and when size matters

  1. Timothy D. Smith†,‡,*,
  2. Kunwar P. Bhatnagar†

Article first published online: 20 JUL 2004

DOI: 10.1002/ar.b.20026

Issue

The Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist

The Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist

Volume 279B, Issue 1, pages 24–31, July 2004

Additional Information

How to Cite

Smith, T. D. and Bhatnagar, K. P. (2004), Microsmatic primates: Reconsidering how and when size matters. Anat. Rec., 279B: 24–31. doi: 10.1002/ar.b.20026

Author Information

  1. †

    Dr. Smith is an associate professor in the School of Physical Therapy, Slippery Rock University, and an adjunct research associate professor in the Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh. A special emphasis in his research concerns evolution of the primate vomeronasal organ. Dr. Bhatnagar is a professor in the Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville School of Medicine. He has studied chemosensory systems for more than 30 years and has studied the relative importance of olfaction versus vision in bats. Dr. Smith, Dr. Bhatnagar, and their colleagues have forthcoming articles in the The Anatomical Record, Part A, that discuss evolutionary aspects of the primate olfactory and vomeronasal systems. This work formed part of the basis for a presentation at the 73rd annual meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists (April 2004) entitled “Is There a Valid Morphological Basis for Primate Macrosomia?”

  2. ‡

    Fax: 724-738-2113

*School of Physical Therapy, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, PA 16057

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 20 JUL 2004
  2. Article first published online: 20 JUL 2004

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (448K)

LITERATURE CITED

  • Ankel-Simons F. 2000. Primate anatomy: an introduction. New York: Academic Press.
  • Baron G, Frahm HD, Bhatnagar KP, Stephan H. 1983. Comparison of brain structure volumes in insectivora and primates: III, main olfactory bulb (MOB). J Hirnforsch 24: 551–568.
  • Bhatnagar KP, Kallen FC. 1974. Cribriform plate of ethmoid, olfactory bulb and olfactory acuity in forty species of bats. J Morph 142: 71–90.
    Direct Link:
  • Bhatnagar KP. 1975. Olfaction in Artibeus jamaicensis and Myotis lucifugus. Experientia 31: 856.
  • Bhatnagar KP, Kallen FC. 1975. Quantitative observations on the nasal epithelia and olfactory innervation in bats: suggested design mechanisms for the olfactory bulb. Acta Anat (Basel) 91: 272–282.
  • Bhatnagar KP, Kennedy RC, Baron G, Greenberg RA. 1987. Number of mitral cells and the bulb volume in the aging human olfactory bulb: a quantitative morphological study. Anat Rec 218: 73–87.
    Direct Link:
  • Bhatnagar KP, Meisami E. 1998. Vomeronasal organ in bats and primates: extremes of structural variability and its phylogenetic implications. Microsc Res Techn 43: 465–475.
    Direct Link:
  • Christensen TA, White J. 2000. Representation of olfactory information in the brain. In: FingerTE, SilverWL, RestrepoD, editors. The neurobiology of taste and smell. New York: Wiley-Liss. p 201–232.
  • Dawley EM. 1998. Species, sex, and seasonal differences in VNO size. Microsc Res Tech 41: 506–518.
    Direct Link:
  • Dawley E, Miller M, Schnader J. 1999. Scaling chemosensory epithelium: how allometry is used to compare adaptations. In: JohnstonRE, et al., editors. Advances in chemical signals in vertebrates. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. p 77–84.
  • Ding X, Dahl AR. 2003. Olfactory mucosa: composition, enzymatic localization and metabolism. In: DotyRL, editor. Handbook of olfaction and gustation. Marcel Dekker. p 51–73.
  • Dorries KM, Adkins-Regan E, Halpern BP. 1997. Sensitivity and behavioral responses to the pheromone androstenone are not mediated by the vomeronasal organ in domestic pigs. Brain Behav Evol 49: 53–62.
  • Elliot Smith G. 1927. The evolution of man. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Evans C. 2003. Vomeronasal chemoreception in vertebrates: a study of the second nose. New York: Imperial College Press.
  • Farbman AI. 2000. Cell biology of the olfactory epithelium. In: FingerTE, SilverWL, RestrepoD, editors. The neurobiology of taste and smell. New York: Wiley-Liss. p 131–158.
  • Fleagle JG. 1999. Primate adaptation and evolution, 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Frahm HD. 1985. Comparison of main olfactory bulb size in mammals. Fortschr Zool 30: 691–693.
  • Gahr M. 1994. Brain structure: causes and consequences of brain sex. In: ShortRV, BalabanE, editors. The differences between the sexes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 273–300.
  • LaRochelle R, Baron G. 1989. Comparative morphology and morphometry of the nasal fossae of four species of North American shrews (Soricinae). Am J Anat 186: 306–314.
    Direct Link:
  • Le Gros Clark WE. 1959. The antecedents of man. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Maico LM, Burrows AM, Mooney MP, Siegel MI, Bhatnagar KP, Smith TD. 2003. Size of the vomeronasal organ in wild Microtus with different mating strategies. Acta Biol Hung 54: 263–273.
  • Martin RD. 1990. Primate origins and evolution: a phylogenetic reconstruction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • McClintock T. 2000. Molecular biology of olfaction. In: FingerTE, SilverWL, RestrepoD, editors. The neurobiology of taste and smell. New York: Wiley-Liss. p 179–199.
  • Meisami E. 1989. A proposed relationship between increases in the number of olfactory receptor neurons, convergence ratio and sensitivity in the developing rat. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 46: 9–19.
  • Meisami E, Louie J, Hudson R, Distel H. 1990. A morphometric comparison of the olfactory epithelium of newborn and weanling rabbits. Cell Tissue Res 62: 89–97.
  • Mirich JM, Williams NC, Berlau DJ, Brunjes PC. 2002. Comparative study of aging in the mouse olfactory bulb. J Comp Neurol 454: 361–372.
    Direct Link:
  • Mombaerts P. 1999. Molecular biology of odorant receptors in vertebrates. Annu Rev Neurosci 22: 487–509.
  • Moulton DG, Beidler LM. 1967. Structure and function of the peripheral olfactory system. Physiol Rev 47: 1–51.
  • Negus V. 1958. The comparative anatomy and physiology of the nose and paranasal sinuses. Edinburgh: Livingston.
  • Radinsky L. 1979. The fossil record of primate brain evolution: 49th James Arthur Lecture on the Evolution of the Human Brain. New York: American Museum of Natural History.
  • Rouquier S, Blancher A, Giorgi D. 2000. The olfactory receptor gene repertoire in primates and mouse: evidence for reduction of the functional fraction in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97: 2870–2874.
  • Segovia S, Guillamón A. 1982. Effects of sex steroids on the development of the vomeronasal organ in the rat. Dev Brain Res 5: 209–212.
  • Shepherd GM. 1972. Synaptic organization of the mammalian olfactory bulb. Physiol Rev 52: 864–917.
  • Smith TD, Siegel MI, Mooney MP, Burdi AR, Burrows AM, Todhunter JS. 1997. Prenatal growth of the human vomeronasal organ. Anat Rec 248: 447–455.
    Direct Link:
  • Smith TD, Siegel MI, Bhatnagar KP. 2001a. Reappraisal of the vomeronasal system of catarrhine primates: ontogeny, morphology, functionality, and persisting questions. Anat Rec (New Anat) 265: 176–192.
    Direct Link:
  • Smith TD, Roslinski DL, Burrows AM, Bhatnagar KP, Mooney MP, Siegel MI. 2001b. Size of the vomeronasal neuroepithelium in two species of Microtus with differing levels of paternal behavior. J Mammal 82: 209–217.
  • Stephan H, Frahm H, Baron G. 1981. New and revised data on volumes of brain structures in insectivores and primates. Folia Primatol 35: 1–29.
  • Takai M, Shigehara N, Egi N, Tsubamoto T. 2002. Endocranial cast and morphology of the olfactory bulb of Amphipithecus mogaungensis (latest middle Eocene of Myanmar). Primates 44: 137–144.
  • Trinh K, Storm DR. 2003. Vomeronasal organ detects odorants in absence of signaling through main olfactory epithelium. Nat Neurosci 6: 519–525.
  • Turner W. 1891. The convolutions of the brain: A study in comparative anatomy. J Anat Physiol 25: 105–153.
  • Weiler E, McCulloch MA, Farbman AI. 1999. Proliferation in the vomeronasal organ of the rat during postnatal development. Euro J Neurosci 11: 700–711.
    Direct Link:
  • Wysocki CJ. 1979. Neurobehavioral evidence for the involvement of the vomeronasal system in mammalian reproduction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 3: 301–341.
  • Zhang J, Webb DM. 2003. Evolutionary deterioration of the vomeronasal pheromone transduction pathway in catarrhine primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 8337–8341.
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (448K)