SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Barker SP. 1998. Comparison of effectiveness of interactive videodisc versus lecture-demonstration instruction. Phys Ther 68: 699703.
  • Berube D, Murray C, Schultze K. 1999. Cadaver and computer use in the teaching of gross anatomy in physical therapy education. J Phys Ther Educ 13: 4146.
  • Boucher B, Hunter D. 1999. The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in teaching biomechanics of the temporomandibular joint. J Phys Ther Educ 13: 4751.
  • Bukowski EL. 2002. Assessment outcomes: computerized instruction in a human gross anatomy course. J Allied Health 31: 153158.
  • Cheng W-C, Thompson CB, Smith JA, Pugh L, Stanley C. 2003. A Web-based breastfeeding education program. J Perinat Educ 12: 2941.
  • Chou C. 2003. Interactivity and interactive functions in Web-based learning systems: a technical framework for designers. Br J Educ Technol 34: 265279.
  • Cottam WW. 1999. Adequacy of medical school gross anatomy education as perceived by certain postgraduate residency programs and anatomy course directors. Clin Anat 12: 5565.
  • Devitt P, Palmer E. 1999. Computer-aided learning: an overvalued educational resource? Med Educ 33: 136139.
  • Drake RL, Lowrie DJ Jr, Prewitt CM. 2002. Survey of gross anatomy, microscopic anatomy, neuroscience, and embryology courses in medical school curricula in the United States. Anat Rec 269: 118122.
  • Erkonen WE, Krachmer M, Cassell MD, Albanese MA, Stanford W. 1992. Cardiac anatomy instruction by ultrafast computed tomography versus cadaver dissection. Invest Radiol 27: 744747.
  • Fleming DE, Mauriello SM, McKaig RG, Ludlow JB. 2003. A comparison of slide/audiotape and Web-based instructional formats for teaching normal intraoral radiographic anatomy. J Dent Hyg 77: 2735.
  • Garg A, Norman G, Spero L, Taylor I. 1999. Learning anatomy: do new computer models improve spatial understanding. Med Teach 21: 519522.
  • Guy JF, Frisby AJ. 1992. Using interactive videodiscs to teach gross anatomy to undergraduates at the Ohio State University. Acad Med 67: 132133.
  • Ha L, James EL. 1998. Interactivity reexamined: a baseline analysis of early business Web sites. J Broadcast Electron Media 42: 456.
  • McNulty JA, Halama J, Dauzvardis M, Espiritu B. 2000. Evaluation of Web-based computer-aided instruction in a basic science course. Acad Med 75: 5965.
  • Portney LG, Watkins MP. 2000. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Predavec M. 2001. Evaluation of E-Rat, a computer-based rat dissection, in terms of student learning outcomes. J Biol Educ 35: 7580.
  • Sims R. 1997. Interactivity: a forgotten art? Comput Hum Behav 13: 157180.
  • Stanford W, Erkonen WE, Cassell MD, Moran BD, Easley G, Carris RL, Albanese MA. 1994. Evaluation of a computer-based program for teaching cardiac anatomy. Invest Radiol 29: 248252.
  • Toth-Cohen S. 1995. Computer-assisted instruction as a learning resource for applied anatomy and kinesiology in the occupational therapy curriculum. Am J Occup Ther 49: 821827.