SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Ainsworth S, Van Labeke N. 2004. Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learn Instr 14: 241255.
  • Anglin GJ, Vaez H, Cunningham KL. 2004. Visual representations and learning: the role of static and animated graphics. In: JonassenDH, editor. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. New York: Macmillan. p 865916.
  • Baddeley A. 1992. Working memory. Science 255: 556559.
  • Berry DC, Banbury S, Henry L. 1997. Transfer across form and modality in implicit and explicit memory. Q J Exp Psychol 50: 124.
  • Betrancourt M, Bisseret A. 1998. Integrating textual and pictorial information via pop-up windows: an experimental study. Behav Inform Technol 17: 263273.
  • Catrambone R. 1998. The subgoal learning model: creating better examples so that students can solve novel problems. J Exp Psychol Gen 12: 355376.
  • Chandler P, Sweller J. 1991. Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition Instruct 8: 293332.
  • Clark JM, Paivio A. 1991. Dual coding theory and education. Educ Psychol Rev 3: 149210.
  • Cooper G, Tindall-Ford S, Chandler P, Sweller J. 2001. Learning by imagining. J Exp Psychol Appl 7: 6882.
  • Dwyer FM, Lamberski RJ. 1983. A review of the research on the effects of the use of color in the teaching-learning process. Int J Instr Media 10: 303327.
  • Gage NL, Berliner DC. 1998. Educational psychology, 6th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Garg A, Norman GR, Spero L, Maheshwari P. 1999. Evaluation of technology-enhanced education: do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning? Acad Med 74: 8789.
  • Garg AX, Norman G, Sperotable L. 2001. How medical students learn spatial anatomy. Lancet 357: 363364.
  • Gyselinck V, Tardieu H. 1999. The role of illustration in text comprehension: what, when, for whom, and why? In: GoldmanSR, Van OostendorpH, editors. The construction of mental representation during reading. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p 195218.
  • Gyselinck V, Ehrlich MF, Cornoldi C, de Beni R, Dubois V. 2000. Visuospatial working memory in learning from multimedia systems. J Comput Assist Lear 16: 166176.
  • Hegarty M, Carpenter PA, Just MA. 1990. Diagram in the comprehension of scientific texts. In: BarrR, KamilML, MosenthalP, PearsonsPD, editors. Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman. p 641668.
  • Hegarty M, Kriz S, Cate C. 2003. The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition Instruct 21: 325360.
  • Jeung H, Chandler P, Sweller J. 1997. The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction. Educ Psychol 17: 329343.
  • Khalil MK, Paas F, Johnson TE, Payer AF. 2005. Design of interactive and dynamic anatomical visualizations: the implication of cognitive load theory. Anat Rec Part B (New Anat) 286B: 1520.
  • Kalyuga S, Chandler P, Sweller J. 1998. Levels of expertise and instructional design. Hum Factors 40: 117.
  • Kalyuga S, Ayres P, Chandler P, Sweller J. 2003. Expertise reversal effect. Educ Psychol 38: 2333.
  • Kinjo H, Snodgrass JG. 2000. Is there a picture superiority effect in perceptual implicit tasks? Eur J Cogn Psychol 12: 145164.
  • Mayer RE, Sims VK. 1994. For whom is a picture worth 1000 words? extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. J Educ Psychol 86: 389401.
  • Mayer RE, Moreno R. 1998. A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: evidence for dual-processing systems in working memory. J Educ Psychol 90: 312320.
  • Mayer RE. 2001. Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mayer RE, Moreno R. 2002. Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educ Psychol Rev 14: 8799.
  • Mayer RE, Moreno R. 2003. Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ Psychol 38: 4352.
  • McDaniel MA, Waddil PJ. 1994. The mnemonic benefit of pictures in text: selective enrichment for differentially skilled readers. In: SchnoltzW, KulhavyRW, editors. Comprehension of graphics. Amsterdam: North Holland/Elsevier Science. p 165181.
  • Miller GA. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63: 8197.
  • Molitor S, Ballsteadt SP, Mandl H. 1989. Problems in knowledge acquisition from text and pictures. In: MandlH, levinR, editors. Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures. Amsterdam: North Holland/Elsevier Science. p 335.
  • Moreno R, Mayer R. 1999. Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: the role of modality and contiguity. J Educ Psychol 91: 358368.
  • Mory HE. 2004. Feedback research revisited. In: JonassenDH, editor. Handbook of research on educational communication and technology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p 745784.
  • Mousavi SY, Low R, Sweller J. 1995. Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. J Educ Psychol 87: 319334.
  • Paas F, Van Merriënboer JJG. 1994. Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: a cognitive-load approach. J Educ Psychol 86: 122133.
  • Paas F, Renkl A, Sweller J. 2003a. Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments. Educ Psychol 38: 14.
  • Paas F, Tuovinen JE, Tabbers H, Van Gerven PWM. 2003b. Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educ Psychol 38: 6371.
  • Paivio A. 1971. Imagery and verbal processing. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Paivio A. 1986. Mental representation: a dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Penny C. 1989. Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Mem Cognition 17: 398422.
  • Ploetzner R, Lowe R. 2004. Dynamic visualisations and learning. Learn Instr 14: 235240.
  • Pollock E, Chandler P, Sweller J. 2002. Assimilating complex information. Learn Instr 12: 6186.
  • Renkl A. 1997. Learning from worked-out examples: a study on individual differences. Cognitive Sci 21: 129.
  • Rieber LP. 1993. Effects of visual grouping strategies of computer-animated presentations on selective attention in science. Educ Technol Res Dev 39: 515.
  • Simon H. 1974. How big is a chunk? Science 183: 482488.
  • Sweller J. 1988. Cognitive load during problem solving. Cognitive Sci 12: 257285.
  • Sweller J, Chandler P. 1991. Evidence for cognitive load theory. Cognition Instruct 8: 351362.
  • Sweller J, Chandler P. 1994. Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition Instruct 12: 185233.
  • Sweller J, van Merriënboer JJG, Paas F. 1998. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educ Psychol Rev 10: 251296.
  • Sweller J. 1999. Instructional design in technical areas. Melbourne: ACER Press.
  • Tversky B, Morrison JB, Betrancourt M. 2002. Animation: can it facilitate? Int J Hum Comput St 57: 247262.
  • Van Merriënboer JJG, Kirschner P, Kester L. 2003. Taking the load off a learner's mind: instructional design for complex learning. Educ Psychol 38: 513.
  • Waddil PJ, McDaniel MA. 1992. Pictorial enhancement of text memory: limitation imposed by picture type and comprehension skill. Mem Cognition 20: 472482.
  • Weidenmann B. 1994. Codes of instructional pictures. In: SchnotzW, KulhavyW, editors. Comprehension of graphics. Amsterdam: North Holland/Elsevier Science. p 291301.
  • West CK. 1981. The social and psychological distortion of information. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
  • West CK, Farmer JA, Wolff PM. 1991. Instructional design implication from cognitive science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. p 170187
  • Worley GM, Moore DM. 2001. The effect of highlight color on immediate recall on subjects of different cognitive styles. Int J Instr Media 28: 169180.
  • Zacks JM, Tversky B. 2001. Event structure in perception and conception. Psychol Bull 127: 321.