SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Jensen G, Morrisey MA, Gaffney S, Liston DK. The new dominance of managed care: insurance trends in the 1990s. Health Aff (Millwood) 1997; 16: 12536.
  • 2
    Landon B, Zaslavsky A, Beaulieu N, Shaul J, Cleary P. Health plan characteristics and consumers' assessments of quality. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001; 20: 27486.
  • 3
    Reisine S, Fifield J. Health insurance problems among insured rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Care Res 1995; 8: 15560.
  • 4
    Katz PP, Yelin EH, Leong A, Sonneborn DR. Health insurance characteristics and health care evaluations among persons with rheumatic diseases in California. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 12: 27108.
  • 5
    Feinglass J, Schroeder JL, Gifford B, Manheim LM. Gatekeepers and the medical specialist: the impact of managed care on rheumatologists. AAPPO J 1992; 2: 138, 34–6.
  • 6
    American College of Rheumatology. 1995 marketing survey. Atlanta: American College of Rheumatology; 1996.
  • 7
    Heffler S, Levit K, Smith S, Smith C, Cowan C, Lazenby H, et al. Health spending growth up in 1999; faster growth expected in future. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001; 20: 193203.
  • 8
    Luft H. HMOs: dimensions of performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1981.
  • 9
    Miller R, Luft H. Managed care plan performance since 1980: a literature analysis. JAMA 1994; 271: 15129.
  • 10
    Miller R, Luft H. Managed care plan performance: evidence from recently published studies. Speech before American Association of Health Plans; 1997 April 3; Washington, DC.
  • 11
    Yelin E, Criswell L, Feigenbaum P. Health care utilization and outcomes among persons with rheumatoid arthritis in fee-for-service and prepaid group practices. JAMA 1996; 276: 104853.
  • 12
    Yelin EH, Henke CJ, Kramer JS, Nevitt MC, Shearn M, Epstein WV. A comparison of the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in health maintenance organizations and fee-for-service practices. N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 9627.
  • 13
    Yelin E, Shearn M, Epstein W. Health outcomes for a chronic disease in pre-paid group practice and fee-for-service settings. Med Care 1986; 24: 23647.
  • 14
    Lubeck D, Brown B, Holman H. Chronic disease and health system performance: care of osteoarthritis across three health systems. Med Care 1985; 23: 26677.
  • 15
    Retchin SM, Clement DG, Rossiter LF, Brown B, Brown R, Nelson L. How the elderly fare in HMOs: outcomes from the Medicare competition demonstrations. Health Serv Res 1992; 27: 65169.
  • 16
    Clement DG, Retchin SM, Brown RS, Stegall MH. Access and outcomes of elderly patients enrolled in managed care. JAMA 1994; 271: 148792.
  • 17
    Mazzuca SA, Brandt KO, Katz BP, Li W, Stewart KD. Therapeutic strategies distinguish community based primary care physicians from rheumatologists in the management of osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 806.
  • 18
    Stewart M, Petri M. Lupus nephritis outcomes: health maintenance organizations compared to non-health maintenance organizations. J Rheumatol 2000; 27: 9002.
  • 19
    Yelin E, Herrndorf A, Trupin L, Sonneborn D. A national study of medical care expenditures for musculoskeletal conditions: the impact of health insurance and managed care. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44: 11609.
  • 20
    Weiner J, de Lissovoy G. Razing a tower of Babel: a taxonomy for managed care and health insurance plans. J Health Polit Policy Law 1993; 18: 75103.
  • 21
    Kerwin J, Cantor D, Sheridan S. Results of rounds 3 and 4 of managed care cognitive interviews for the household portion of MEPS. Report to AHCPR from Westat, Inc; March 7, 1995.
  • 22
    Kovar M, Poe G. The National Health Interview Survey Design 1973–1984 and procedures 1975–1983. Vital Health Stat 1 1985.
  • 23
    Bye B, Schechter E. 1978 Survey of disability and work: technical introduction. Washington (DC): Social Security Administration; 1982.
  • 24
    Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980; 23: 13745.
  • 25
    Goldsmith C, Boers M, Bombardier C, Tugwell P. Criteria for clinically important changes in outcomes: development, scoring, and evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patient and trial profiles. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 5615.
  • 26
    Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, Bombardier C, Furst D, Goldsmith C, et al. American College of Rheumatology preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 72735.
  • 27
    SAS Institute, Inc. SAS/STAT Software: changes and enhancements through Release 6.12. Cary, (NC): SAS Institute; 1997.