• 1
    Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 228691.
  • 2
    Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, Kennedy LG, O'Hea J, Mallorie P, et al. A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 22815.
  • 3
    Dougados M, Gueguen A, Nakache JP, Nguyen M, Mery C, Amor B. Evaluation of a functional index and an articular index in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 3027.
  • 4
    Ohnhaus EE, Adler R. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain 1975; 1: 37984.
  • 5
    Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976; 2: 17584.
  • 6
    Huskisson EC, Jones J, Scott PJ. Application of visual-analogue scales to the measurement of functional capacity. Rheumatol Rehabil 1976; 15: 1857.
  • 7
    Scott PJ, Huskisson EC. Measurement of functional capacity with visual analogue scales. Rheumatol Rehabil 1977; 16: 2579.
  • 8
    Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983; 17: 4556.
  • 9
    Dixon JS, Bird HA. Reproducibility along a 10 cm vertical visual analogue scale. Ann Rheum Dis 1981; 40: 879.
  • 10
    Kremer E, Atkinson JH, Ignelzi RJ. Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement. Pain 1981; 10: 2418.
  • 11
    Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain 1986; 27: 11726.
  • 12
    Bird HA, Dixon JS. The measurement of pain. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 1987; 1: 7189.
  • 13
    Guyatt GH, Townsend M, Berman LB, Keller JL. A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 112933.
  • 14
    Ferraz MB, Quaresma MR, Aquino LR, Atra E, Tugwell P, Goldsmith CH. Reliability of pain scales in the assessment of literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1990; 17: 10224.
  • 15
    Eyres S, van der Heijde D, Dougados M, Tennant A. The Visual Analogue Scale: deception on a “VASt” scale? submitted for publication.
  • 16
    Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis 1978; 37: 37881.
  • 17
    Bolton JE, Wilkinson RC. Responsiveness of pain scales: a comparison of three pain intensity measures in chiropractic patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1998; 21: 17.
  • 18
    Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. What is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement? Pain 1994; 58: 38792.
  • 19
    Boers M, Brooks P, Strand CV, Tugwell P. The OMERACT filter for outcome measures in rheumatology [editorial]. J Rheumatol 1998; 25: 1989.
  • 20
    Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 141732.
  • 21
    Creemers MC, van't Hof MA, Franssen MJ, van de Putte LB, Gribnau FW, van Riel PL. A Dutch version of the functional index for ankylosing spondylitis: development and validation in a long-term study. Br J Rheumatol 1994; 33: 8426.
  • 22
    Ruof J, Sangha O, Stucki G. Evaluation of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and Dougados Functional Index (D-FI). [German]. Z Rheumatol 1999; 58: 21825.
  • 23
    Creusen E, van der Heijde D, Spoorenberg A, de Klerk E, van der Tempel H, Miedema H, et al. How to deal with missing answers in self-assessment questionnaires in ankylosing spondylitis: BASDAI-BASFI-ASFI? submitted for publication.
  • 24
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 30710.
  • 25
    Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 1989.
  • 26
    Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1989; 27: S17889.
  • 27
    Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care 1990; 28: 63242.
  • 28
    Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 1718.
  • 29
    Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
  • 30
    Van der Heijde D, Calin A, Dougados M, Khan MA, van der Linden S, Bellamy N. Selection of instruments in the core set for DC-ART, SMARD, physical therapy, and clinical record keeping in ankylosing spondylitis: progress report of the ASAS Working Group. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 9514.
  • 31
    Ruof J, Sangha O, Stucki G. Comparative responsiveness of 3 functional indices in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 195963.