• 1
    Employee Benefit Research Institute. Measuring the quality of health care. EBRI Issue Brief Number 159. Washington (DC): Employee Benefit Research Institute; 1995.
  • 2
    Institute of Medicine. America's health in transition: protecting and improving quality. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1994.
  • 3
    Donabedian A. The definition of duality and approaches to its assessment: explorations in quality assessment and monitoring. Ann Arbor (Ml): Health Administration Press; 1980.
  • 4
    Donabedian A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA 1992; 260: 17438.
  • 5
    National Committee on Quality Assurance (NCQA). Health plan employer data and information set and users' manual. Version 3.0. Washington (DC): NCQA; 1996.
  • 6
    Lohr K. Outcome measurement: concepts and questions. Inquiry 1988; 25: 3750.
  • 7
    Donabedian A. A primer of quality assurance and monitoring in medical care. Conference on Law Practice Quality Evaluation; 1987 Sept, Williamsburg, VA.
  • 8
    World Health Organization (WHO). The first ten years of the World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1958.
  • 9
    Callahan LF, Pincus T, Huston JW III, Brooks RH, Nance EP Jr, Kaye JJ. Measures of activity and damage in rheumatoid arthritis: depiction of changes and prediction of mortality over five years. Arthritis Care Res 1997; 10: 38194.
  • 10
    Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, Bombardier C, Chernoff M, Fried B, et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum 1993; 36: 72940.
  • 11
    Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE. The MOS short-form general health survey: reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care 1988; 26: 72435.
  • 12
    StewartAL, WareJE, editors. Measuring functioning and well-being. Durham (NC): Duke University Press; 1992.
  • 13
    Ware JE. SF-36 Health Survey: manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute; 1993.
  • 14
    McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu JFR, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32: 4066.
  • 15
    Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980; 23: 13745.
  • 16
    Pincus T, Summey JA, Soraci SA Jr, Wallston KA, Hummon NP. Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1983; 26: 134653.
  • 17
    Meenan RF, Gertman PM, Mason JH. Measuring health status in arthritis: the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales. Arthritis Rheum 1980; 23: 14652.
  • 18
    Meenan RF, Mason JH, Anderson JJ, Guccione AA, Kazis LE. AIMS2: the content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1992; 35: 110.
  • 19
    Stewart AL, Painter PL. Measuring physical functioning and disability in arthritis patients. Arthritis Care Res 1997; 10: 395405.
  • 20
    Landgraf JM, Abetz L, Ware JE. Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ): a user's manual. Boston: The Health Institute; 1996.
  • 21
    Howe S, Levinson J, Shear E, Hartner S, McGirr G, Schulte M, et al. Development of a disability measurement tool for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: the Juvenile Arthritis Functional Assessment Report for children and their parents. Arthritis Rheum 1991; 34: 87380.
  • 22
    Parker JC, Wright GE. Assessment of psychological outcomes and quality of life in the rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Care Res 1997; 10: 40612.
  • 23
    Greenfield S, Nelson EC. Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings. Med Care 1992; 30:MS23-41.
  • 24
    Ware JE, Brook RH, Davies AR, Lohr KN. Choosing measures of health status for individuals in general populations. Am J Public Health 1981; 71: 6205.
  • 25
    Daltroy LH. Common problems in using, modifying, and reporting on classic measurement instruments. Arthritis Care Res 1997; 10: 4417.
  • 26
    Stucki G, Liang MH, Phillips C, Katz JN. The Short Form-36 is preferable to the SIP as a generic health status measure in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res 1995; 8: 17481.
  • 27
    DeVellis RF. A consumer's guide to finding, evaluating, and reporting on measurement instruments. Arthritis Care Res 1996; 9: 23945.
  • 28
    Ruchlin HS, Allegrante JP, Einstein J, O'Doherty J, Rob-bins L, Peterson MGE, et al. A method for documenting the economic efficacy of multiple-component interventions designed to enhance functional and social status. Arthritis Care Res 1997; 10: 1518.
  • 29
    Showstack JA, Katz PP, Amend W, Bernstein L, Lipton HL, O'Leary M, et al. The effect of cyclosporine on hospital resource use for kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 108692.
  • 30
    Showstack JA, Katz PP, Amend WA, Salvatierra O. The association of cyclosporine with the one-year costs of cadaver-donor kidney transplants. JAMA 1990; 264: 181823.
  • 31
    Ruchlin HS, Elkin EB, Paget SA. Assessing cost-effectiveness analyses in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoar-thritis. Arthritis Care Res 1997; 10: 41321.
  • 32
    Di Palo MT. Rating satisfaction research: is it poor, fair, good, very good, or excellent? Arthritis Care Res 1997; 10: 42230.
  • 33
    Pascoe G. Patient satisfaction in primary health care: a literature review and analysis. Eval Program Plann 1983; 6: 185210.
  • 34
    Greenfield T, Attkisson C. Steps toward a multifactorial satisfaction scale for primary care and mental health services. Eval Program Plann 1989; 12: 2718.
  • 35
    Weiss G. Patient satisfaction with primary medical care: evaluation of sociodemographic and predispositional factors. Med Care 1988; 26: 38392.
  • 36
    González-Calvo J, González VM, Lorig K. Cultural diversity issues in the development of valid and reliable measures of health status. Arthritis Care Res 1997; 10: 44856.
  • 37
    LaValley MP, Anderson JJ. Statistical and study design issues in assessing the quality and outcomes of care in rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Care Res 1997; 10: 43140.
  • 38
    Siu AL, McGlynn EA, Morgenstern H, Beers MH, Carlisle DM, Keeler EB, et al. Choosing quality of care measures based on the expected impact of improved care on health. Health Serv Res 1992; 27: 61950.
  • 39
    Blumenthal D. Quality of care: what is it? N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 8914.
  • 40
    Davies AR, Ware JE. Involving consumers in quality of care assessment. Health Affairs 1988; 7: 3348.
  • 41
    Ware JE, Davies-Avery A, Stewart AL. The measurement and meaning of patient satisfaction. Health Med Care Serv Rev 1978; 1: 115.
  • 42
    Solberg L, Peterson K, Ellis R, Romness K, Rohrenbach E, Tell T, et al. The Minnesota Project: a focused approach to ambulatory quality assessment. Inquiry 1990; 27: 35967.
  • 43
    Benson DS, Townes PG Jr. Excellence in ambulatory care: a practical guide to developing effective quality assurance programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1990.
  • 44
    Browner W, Showstack J, Braveman P, Selby J. Indicators to measure the reduction of blindness due to proliferative retinopathy and other diabetic eye disease. San Francisco: Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco; 1985.
  • 45
    Yelin E, Such C, Criswell L, Epstein W. Outcomes for persons with RA treated by rheumatologists and non-rheumatologists (abstract). Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38 Suppl 9: S187.
  • 46
    Solomon DH, Bates DW, Panush RS, Katz JN. Costs, outcomes, and patient satisfaction by provider type for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions: a critical review of the literature and proposed methodologic standards. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 5260.