SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Lawrence JS, Bremner JM, Bier F. Osteo-arthrosis: prevalence in the population and relationship between symptoms and x-ray changes. Ann Rheum Dis 1966; 25: 124.
  • 2
    Altman RD, Fries JF, Bloch DA, Carstens J, Cooke TD, Genant H, et al. Radiographic assessment of progression in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1987; 30: 121425.
  • 3
    Ravaud P, Giraudeau B, Auleley GR, Drape JL, Rousselin B, Paolozzi L, et al. Variability in knee radiographing: implication for definition of radiological progression in medial knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1998; 57: 6249.
  • 4
    Vignon E, Conrozier T, Piperno M, Richard S, Carrillon Y, Fantino O. Radiographic assessment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: recommendations: recommended guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999; 7: 4346.
  • 5
    Piperno M, Hellio Le Graverand MP, Conrozier T, Bochu M, Mathieu P, Vignon E. Quantitative evaluation of joint space width in femorotibial osteoarthritis: comparison of three radiographic views. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1998; 6: 2529.
  • 6
    Buckland-Wright JC. Quantitative radiography of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1994; 53: 26875.
  • 7
    Buckland-Wright JC, Macfarlane DG, Williams SA, Ward RJ. Accuracy and precision of joint space width measurements in standard and macroradiographs of osteoarthritic knees. Ann Rheum Dis 1995; 54: 87280.
  • 8
    Buckland-Wright JC, Wolfe F, Ward RJ, Flowers N, Hayne C. Substantial superiority of semiflexed (MTP) views in knee osteoarthritis: a comparative radiographic study, without fluoroscopy, of standing extended, semiflexed (MTP), and schuss views. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 266474.
  • 9
    Lequesne M, Nguyen NJH, Rodriguez P, Masse JP, Glimet T. Vitesse du pincement de l'interligne au cours de la gonarthrose fémoro-tibiale interne: validité de la mesure [abstract]. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 1990; 57: A14.
  • 10
    Lequesne M, Glimet T, Masse JP, Orvain J. Speed of the joint narrowing in primary medical osteoarthritis of the knee over 3-5 years [abstract]. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1998; 1: 23.
  • 11
    Buckland-Wright JC, Macfarlane DG, Lynch JA, Jasani MK, Bradshaw CR. Joint space width measures cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis of the knee: high resolution plain film and double contrast macroradiographic investigation. Ann Rheum Dis 1995; 54: 2638.
  • 12
    Ayral X, Gueguen A, Ike RW, Bonvarlet JP, Frizziero L, Kalunian K, et al. Inter-observer reliability of the arthroscopic quantification of chondropathy of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1998; 6: 1606.
  • 13
    Drape JL, Pessis E, Auleley GR, Chevrot A, Dougados M, Ayral X. Quantitative MR imaging evaluation of chondropathy in osteoarthritic knees. Radiology 1998; 208: 4955.
  • 14
    Boegard T, Rudling O, Petersson IF, Jonsson K. Correlation between radiographically diagnosed osteophytes and magnetic resonance detected cartilage defects in the tibiofemoral joint. Ann Rheum Dis 1998; 57: 4017.
  • 15
    Biswal S, Hastie T, Andriacchi TP, Bergman GA, Dillingham MF, Lang P. Risk factors for progressive cartilage loss in the knee: a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study in forty-three patients. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 288492.
  • 16
    Eckstein F, Adam C, Sittek H, Becker C, Milz S, Schulte E, et al. Non-invasive determination of cartilage thickness throughout joint surfaces using magnetic resonance imaging. J Biomech 1997; 30: 2859.
  • 17
    Frank LR, Wong EC, Luh WM, Ahn JM, Resnick D. Articular cartilage in the knee: mapping of the physiologic parameters at MR imaging with a local gradient coil—preliminary results. Radiology 1999; 210: 2416.
  • 18
    Hardya PA, Newmark R, Liu YM, Meier D, Norris S, Piraino DW, et al. The influence of the resolution and contrast on measuring the articular cartilage volume in magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 18: 96572.
  • 19
    Haubner M, Eckstein F, Schnier M, Losch A, Sittek H, Becker C, et al. A non-invasive technique for 3-dimensional assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI. Part 2. Validation using CT arthrography. Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 15: 80513.
  • 20
    Hohe J, Faber S, Stammberger T, Reiser M, Englmeier KH, Eckstein F. A technique for 3D in vivo quantification of proton density and magnetization transfer coefficients of knee joint cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2000; 8: 42633.
  • 21
    Hyhlik-Durr A, Faber S, Burgkart R, Stammberger T, Maag KP, Englmeier KH, et al. Precision of tibial cartilage morphometry with a coronal water-excitation MR sequence. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 297303.
  • 22
    Peterfy CG, Genant HK. Emerging applications of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of articular cartilage. Radiol Clin North Am 1996; 34: 195213.
  • 23
    Sittek H, Eckstein F, Gavazzeni A, Milz S, Kiefer B, Schulte E, et al. Assessment of normal patellar cartilage volume and thickness using MRI: an analysis of currently available pulse sequences. Skeletal Radiol 1996; 25: 5562.
  • 24
    Uhl M, Ihling C, Allmann KH, Laubenberger J, Tauer U, Adler CP, et al. Human articular cartilage: in vitro correlation of MRI and histologic findings. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 11239.
  • 25
    McGibbon CA, Palmer WE, Krebs DE. A general computing method for spatial cartilage thickness from co-planar MRI. Med Eng Phys 1998; 20: 16976.
  • 26
    Eckstein F, Schnier M, Haubner M, Priebsch J, Glaser C, Englmeier KH, et al. Accuracy of cartilage volume and thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop 1998; 352: 13748.
  • 27
    Eckstein F, Westhoff J, Sittek H, Maag KP, Haubner M, Faber S, et al. In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 5937.
  • 28
    Eckstein F, Winzheimer M, Westhoff J, Schnier M, Haubner M, Englmeier KH, et al. Quantitative relationships of normal cartilage volumes of the human knee joint—assessment by magnetic resonance imaging. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1998; 197: 38390.
  • 29
    Pilch L, Stewart C, Gordon D, Inman R, Parsons K, Pataki I, et al. Assessment of cartilage volume in the femorotibial joint with magnetic resonance imaging and 3D computer reconstruction. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 230721.
  • 30
    Piplani MA, Disler DG, McCauley TR, Holmes TJ, Cousins JP. Articular cartilage volume in the knee: semiautomated determination from three-dimensional reformations of MR images. Radiology 1996; 198: 8559.
  • 31
    Peterfy CG, van Dijke CF, Janzen DL, Gluer CC, Namba R, Majumdar S, et al. Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. Radiology 1994; 192: 48591.
  • 32
    Peterfy CG, van Dijke CF, Lu Y, Nguyen A, Connick TJ, Kneeland JB, et al. Quantification of the volume of articular cartilage in the metacarpophalangeal joints of the hand: accuracy and precision of three-dimensional MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165: 3715.
  • 33
    Stammberger T, Herberhold C, Faber S, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, Eckstein F. A method for quantifying time dependent changes in MR signal intensity of articular cartilage as a function of tissue deformation in intact joints. Med Eng Phys 1998; 20: 7419.
  • 34
    Stammberger T, Eckstein F, Michaelis M, Englmeier KH, Reiser M. Interobserver reproducibility of quantitative cartilage measurements: comparison of B-spline snakes and manual segmentation. Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 17: 103342.
  • 35
    Stammberger T, Eckstein F, Englmeier KH, Reiser M. Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: computational method and reproducibility in the living. Magn Reson Med 1999; 41: 52936.
  • 36
    Raynauld J-P, Kauffmann C, Beaudoin G, Berthiaume MJ, de Guise JA, Bloch DA, et al. Reliability of a quantification imaging system using magnetic resonance images to measure cartilage thickness and volume in human normal and osteoarthritic knees. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003; 11: 35160.
  • 37
    Cicuttini F, Forbes A, Morris K, Darling S, Bailey M, Stuckey S. Gender differences in knee cartilage volume as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999; 7: 26571.
  • 38
    Cicuttini F, Forbes A, Asbeutah A, Morris K, Stuckey S. Comparison and reproducibility of fast and conventional spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance sequences in the determination of knee cartilage volume. J Orthop Res 2000; 18: 5804.
  • 39
    Waterton JC, Solloway S, Foster JE, Keen MC, Gandy S, Middleton BJ, et al. Diurnal variation in the femoral articular cartilage of the knee in young adult humans. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43: 12632.
  • 40
    Kladny B, Bail H, Swoboda B, Schiwy-Bochat H, Beyer WF, Weseloh G. Cartilage thickness measurement in magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1996; 4: 1816.
  • 41
    Kladny B, Martus P, Schiwy-Bochat KH, Weseloh G, Swoboda B. Measurement of cartilage thickness in the human knee-joint by magnetic resonance imaging using a three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence. Int Orthop 1999; 23: 2647.
  • 42
    Cicuttini FM, Forbes A, Yuanyuan W, Rush G, Stuckey SL. Rate of knee cartilage loss after partial meniscectomy. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 19546.
  • 43
    Cicuttini FM, Wluka AE, Forbes A, Wolfe R. Comparison of tibial cartilage volume and radiologic grade of the tibiofemoral joint. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 6828.
  • 44
    Wluka AE, Stuckey S, Snaddon J, Cicuttini FM. The determinants of change in tibial cartilage volume in osteoarthritic knees. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 206572.
  • 45
    Wluka AE, Stuckey S, Brand C, Cicuttini FM. Supplementary vitamin E does not affect the loss of cartilage volume in knee osteoarthritis: a 2 year double blind randomized placebo controlled study. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 258591.
  • 46
    Gandy SJ, Dieppe PA, Keen MC, Maciewicz RA, Watt I, Waterton JC. No loss of cartilage volume over three years in patients with knee osteoarthritis as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002; 10: 92937.
  • 47
    Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Dieppe PA, Hirsch R, Helmick CG, Jordan JM, et al. Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1. The disease and its risk factors. Ann Intern Med 2000; 133: 63546.
  • 48
    Dougados M, Gueguen A, Nguyen M, Berdah L, Lequesne M, Mazieres B, et al. Radiological progression of hip osteoarthritis: definition, risk factors and correlations with clinical status. Ann Rheum Dis 1996; 55: 35662.
  • 49
    Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29: 103949.
  • 50
    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957; 16: 494501.
  • 51
    Andriacchi TP, Lang PL, Alexander EJ, Hurwitz DE. Methods for evaluating the progression of osteoarthritis. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000; 37: 16370.
  • 52
    Bachmann GF, Basad E, Rauber K, Damian MS, Rau WS. Degenerative joint disease on MRI and physical activity: a clinical study of the knee joint in 320 patients. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 14552.
  • 53
    Bredella MA, Tirman PF, Peterfy CG, Zarlingo M, Feller JF, Bost FW, et al. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172: 107380.
  • 54
    Reginster JY, Deroisy R, Rovati LC, Lee RL, Lejeune E, Bruyere O, et al. Long-term effects of glucosamine sulphate on osteoarthritis progression: a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Lancet 2001; 357: 2516.
  • 55
    Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 183340.
  • 56
    Raynauld J-P, Bellamy N, Choquette D. A French version of the WOMAC questionnaire [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 1994; 37: 158.
  • 57
    Buckland-Wright JC, Macfarlane DG, Jasani MK, Lynch JA. Quantitative microfocal radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis of the knee from weight bearing tunnel and semiflexed standing views. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 173441.
  • 58
    Lynch JA, Buckland-Wright JC, Macfarlane DG. Precision of joint space width measurement in knee osteoarthritis from digital image analysis of high definition macroradiographs. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1993; 1: 20918.
  • 59
    Gluer CC, Blake G, Lu Y, Blunt BA, Jergas M, Genant HK. Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 1995; 5: 26270.
  • 60
    Cicuttini FM, Wluka AE, Stuckey SL. Tibial and femoral cartilage changes in knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60: 97780.
  • 61
    Cerejo R, Dunlop DD, Cahue S, Channin D, Song J, Sharma L. The influence of alignment on risk of knee osteoarthritis progression according to baseline stage of disease. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 26326.
  • 62
    Dougados M, Nguyen M, Berdah L, Maziéres B, Vignon E, Lequesne M, for the ECHODIAH Investigators Study Group. Evaluation of the structure-modifying effects of diacerein in hip osteoarthritis: ECHODIAH, a three-year, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44: 253947.
  • 63
    Pavelka K, Gatterova J, Altman RD. Radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis in a Czech cohort. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2000; 18: 4737.
  • 64
    Altman RD, Brandt KD, Hochberg MC, Moskowitz RW, Bellamy N, Bloch DA, et al. Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis: recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1996; 4: 21743.