SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Meenan RF, Gertman PM, Mason JH. Measuring health status in arthritis, the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales. Arthritis Rheum 1980; 23: 14652.
  • 2
    Hendricson WD, Russell IJ, Rrihoda YJ, Jacodson JM, Rogan A, Bishop GD, et al. Development and initial validation of a dual-language English-Spanish format for the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales. Arthritis Rheum 1989; 32: 11539.
  • 3
    Archenholtz B, Bjelle A. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of a Swedish version of the revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS2). J Rheumatol 1997; 24: 13707.
  • 4
    Salaffi F, Ferraccioli GF, Troise Rioda W, Carotti M, Sacchini G, Cervini C. The validity and reliability of the Italian version of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Recent Prog Med 1992; 83: 711.
  • 5
    Brandao L, Ferraz MB, Zerbini CA. Health status in rheumatoid arthritis: cross cultural evaluation of a Portuguese version of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (BRASIL-AIMS2). J Rheumatol 1998; 25: 149950.
  • 6
    Evers AW, Taal E, Kraaimaat FW, Jacobs JW, Abdel-Nasser A, Rasker JJ, et al. A comparison of two recently developed health status instruments for patients with arthritis: Dutch-AIMS2 and IRGL: Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales: Impact of Rheumatic diseases on General health and Lifestyle. Br J Rheumatol 1998; 37: 15764.
  • 7
    Pouchot J, Guillemin F, Coste J, Bregeon C, Sany J, Quality of Life in Rheumatology Task Force. Validation of the French version of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 and comparison with the French version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1996; 63: 389404.
  • 8
    Neumann L, Dudnik Y, Bolotin A, Buskila D. Evaluation of a Hebrew version of the revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS2) in patients with fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 181621.
  • 9
    Sato H, Araki S, Hashimoto A, Kondo H, Ishihara Y, Akizuki M, et al. The validity and reliability of a Japanese version of Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ryumachi 1995; 35: 56674.
  • 10
    Meenan RF. The AIMS approach to health status measurement: conceptual background and measurement properties. J Rheumatol 1982; 9: 7858.
  • 11
    Meenan RF, Anderson JJ, Kazis LE, Egger MJ, Altz-Smith M, Samuelson CO Jr, et al. Outcome assessment in clinical trail: evidence for the sensitivity of a health status measure. Arthritis Rheum 1984; 27: 134453.
  • 12
    Mason JH, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. A model of health status for rheumatoid arthritis: a factor analysis of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales. Arthritis Rheum 1988; 31: 71420.
  • 13
    Buchbinder R, Bombardier C, Yeung M, Tugwell P. Which outcome measure should be used in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials: clinical and quality of life measures responsiveness to treatment in a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 156880.
  • 14
    Meenan RF, Mason JH, Anderson JJ, Gucciona AA, Kazis LE. AIMS2: the content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales health status questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1992; 35: 110.
  • 15
    Lam CL, Gandek B, Ren XS, Chan MS. Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese (HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 113947.
  • 16
    Chan L, Howe HS, Lim TH, Low CK, Koh ET, Seow A, et al. Cross cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese Health Assessment Questionnaire for use in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1998; 25: 17058.
  • 17
    Leung KF, Tay M, Cheng SSW, Lin F. Hong Kong Chinese version of World Health Organization Quality of Life measure: abbreviated version WHOQOL–BREF (HK). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Hospital Authority; 1997.
  • 18
    Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Foies JF, Cooper NS, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988; 31: 31524.
  • 19
    Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 7039.
  • 20
    Scientific Advisory Committee of Medical Outcome Trust. Instrument review criteria [abstract]. Med Outcomes Trust Bull 1995; 3: IIV.
  • 21
    McDowell I. The theoretical and technical foundations of health measurement. In: McDowell I, Newell C, editors. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 1046.