• 1
    Whyte J. Toward a methodology for rehabilitation research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 73: 42835.
  • 2
    Whiteneck GG. The 44th annual John Stanley Coulter lecture: measuring what matters: key rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 10736.
  • 3
    Bickenbach JE, Chatterji S, Badley EM, Ustun TB. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 117387.
  • 4
    Kvien TK, Heiberg T. The patient perspective in outcome assessments: perceptions or something more? J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 8736.
  • 5
    Tugwell P, Bombardier C, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Grace E, Hanna B. The MACTAR Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire: an individualized functional priority approach for assessing improvement in physical disability in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1987; 14: 44651.
  • 6
    Clinch J, Tugwell P, Wells G, Shea B. Individualized functional priority approach to the assessment of health related quality of life in rheumatology. J Rheumatol 2001; 28: 44551.
  • 7
    Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl M, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 3rd ed. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 1998.
  • 8
    McColl MA, Paterson M, Davies D, Doubt L, Law M. Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther 2000; 67: 2230.
  • 9
    Carpenter L, Baker GA, Tyldesley B. The use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as an outcome of a pain management program. Can J Occup Ther 2001; 68: 1622.
  • 10
    Ripat J, Etcheverry E, Cooper J, Tate RB. A comparison of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and the Health Assessment Questionnaire. Can J Occup Ther 2001; 68: 24753.
  • 11
    Wressle E, Samuelsson K, Henriksson C. Responsiveness of the Swedish version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scand J Occ Ther 1999; 6: 849.
  • 12
    Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N, Mccoll MA, Carswell A, Baptiste S. Pilot testing of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: clinical and measurement issues. Can J Occup Ther 1994; 61: 1917.
  • 13
    Toomey M, Nicholson D, Carswell A. The clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther 1995; 62: 2429.
  • 14
    Wressle E, Marcusson J, Henriksson C. Clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure-Swedish version. Can J Occup Ther 2002; 69: 408.
  • 15
    Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl M, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. [Norwegian version]. NRRK; 2001.
  • 16
    Boers M, Brooks P, Strand CV, Tugwell P. The OMERACT filter for outcome measures in rheumatology. J Rheumatol 1998; 25: 1989.
  • 17
    Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hand. Arthritis Rheum 1990; 33: 160110.
  • 18
    Pincus T, Summey JA, Soraci SAJ, Wallston KA, Hummon NP. Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1983; 26: 134653.
  • 19
    Meenan RF, Mason JH, Anderson JJ, Guccione AA, Kazis LE. AIMS2: the content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1992; 35: 110.
  • 20
    Heiberg T, Kvien TK. Preferences for improved health examined in 1,024 patients with rheumatoid arthritis: pain has highest priority. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 47: 3917.
  • 21
    Bellamy N. WOMAC osteoarthritis index: users guide IV. 2000.
  • 22
    Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Bellamy N, Kvien TK. Examinations of the Norwegian Version of AUSCAN: a disease specific measure of hand osteoarthritis (OA). Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60 Suppl I: 233.
  • 23
    Polit DF, Hungler BP. Assessing data quality. In: Nursing research: principles and methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1999.
  • 24
    Domholdt E. Physical therapy research. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000.
  • 25
    Spector WD. Functional disability scales. In: SpilkerB, editor. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p. 13343.
  • 26
    Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measurement in clinical trials: choosing the right approach. In: SpilkerB, editor. Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven 1996. p. 110.
  • 27
    Law M. Measurement in occupational therapy: scientific criteria for evaluation. Can J Occup Ther 1987; 54: 1338.
  • 28
    Yelin E, Lubeck D, Holman H, Epstein W. The impact of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: the activities of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis compared to controls. J Rheumatol 1987; 14: 7107.
  • 29
    Bodiam C. The use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for the assessment of outcome on a neurorehabilitation unit. Br J Occup Ther 1999; 62: 1236.
  • 30
    Beaton DE, Tarasuk V, Katz JN, Wright JG, Bombardier C. “Are you better?” A qualitative study of the meaning of recovery. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 45: 2709.
  • 31
    Katz PP, Yelin EH. Activity loss and the onset of depressive symptoms: do some activities matter more than others? Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44: 11941202.
  • 32
    Katz PP, Neugebauer A. Does satisfaction with abilities mediate the relationship between the impact of rheumatoid arthritis on valued activities and depressive symptoms? Arthritis Rheum 2001; 45: 2639.
  • 33
    Tryssenaar J, Jones EJ, Lee D. Occupational performance needs of a shelter population. Can J Occup Ther 1999; 66: 18896.
  • 34
    Soderman P, Malchau H. Validity and reliability of Swedish WOMAC osteoarthritis index: a self-administered disease-specific questionnaire (WOMAC) versus generic instruments (SF-36 and NHP). Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 3946.
  • 35
    Karoly P, Jensen MP. Multimethod assessment of chronic pain. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1987.