Early suppression of disease activity is essential for maintenance of work capacity in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis: Five-year experience from the FIN-RACo trial
Article first published online: 7 JAN 2005
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Rheumatology
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Volume 52, Issue 1, pages 36–41, January 2005
How to Cite
Puolakka, K., Kautiainen, H., Möttönen, T., Hannonen, P., Korpela, M., Hakala, M., Järvinen, P., Ahonen, J., Forsberg, S. and Leirisalo-Repo, M. (2005), Early suppression of disease activity is essential for maintenance of work capacity in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis: Five-year experience from the FIN-RACo trial. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 52: 36–41. doi: 10.1002/art.20716
- Issue published online: 7 JAN 2005
- Article first published online: 7 JAN 2005
- Manuscript Accepted: 14 SEP 2004
- Manuscript Received: 18 APR 2004
- Paulo Foundation and the medical research foundations of Lappeenranta Central Hospital
- Rheumatism Foundation Hospital
To explore the impact of an early treatment response on maintenance of work capacity in patients with early, active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
In the Finnish Rheumatoid Arthritis Combination Therapy trial, 195 patients with recent-onset RA were randomized to receive either a combination of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) with prednisolone or a single DMARD with or without prednisolone for 2 years. Treatment responses were evaluated according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. After a 5-year followup, the cumulative number of days of sick leave and RA-related permanent work disability was calculated for each of the 162 patients who were available for the active work force at baseline.
Of the 159 patients assessed at 6 months, 29 were in clinical remission, 66 achieved an ACR50 response but not remission, 29 achieved an ACR20 response but not an ACR50 response, and 35 failed to achieve an ACR20 response. In these 4 groups, the median numbers of work disability days per patient-year from 6 months through 60 months of followup were 0 (interquartile range [IQR] 0–3), 4 (IQR 0–131), 16 (IQR 0–170), and 352 (16–365), respectively (P < 0.001). Pairwise multiple comparisons showed a statistically significant difference between all groups except the ACR50 and ACR20 groups. At 12 months, 30 patients were in remission. None of the 44 patients in remission at 6 or 12 months became permanently work disabled over the 5-year followup, as compared with 15 patients in the ACR50 group (23%), 6 in the ACR20 group (21%), and 19 without an ACR20 response at 6 months (56%).
Prompt induction of remission translates into maintenance of work capacity. At 6 months, an ACR50 response is no better than an ACR20 response with regard to future productivity, while failure to achieve an ACR20 response carries a high risk for work disability.