SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Nestor BJ. Surgical treatment of the rheumatoid elbow. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1998; 24: 8399.
  • 2
    Rahme H, Jacobsen MB, Salomonsson B. The Swedish elbow arthroplasty register and the Swedish shoulder arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72: 10712.
  • 3
    Gschwend N, Simmen BR, Matejovski Z. Late complications in elbow arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1996; 5: 8696.
  • 4
    McAuliffe JA. Surgical alternatives for elbow arthritis in the young adult. Hand Clin 2002; 18: 99111.
  • 5
    Gschwend N. Present state of the art in elbow arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 2002; 68: 10017.
  • 6
    Kraay MJ, Figgie MP, Inglis AE, Wolfe SW, Ranawat CS. Primary semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty: survival analysis of 113 consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1994; 76B: 63640.
  • 7
    Morrey BF, Adams RA. Semiconstrained elbow replacement for distal humeral non-union. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1995; 77B: 6772.
  • 8
    Gschwend N, Scheier NH, Baehler AR. Long-term results of the GSB III elbow artrhoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1999; 81B: 100512.
  • 9
    Lee DH. Posttraumatic elbow arthritis and arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1999; 30: 14162.
  • 10
    Hildebrand KA, Patterson SD, Regan WD, McDermid JC, King GJW. Functional outcome of semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2000; 82A: 137986.
  • 11
    Ikavalko M, Lehto MUK, Repo A, Kautiainen H, Hamalainen M. The Souter-Strathclyde elbow arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological study of 525 consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2002; 84B: 7782.
  • 12
    Angst F, Pap G, Mannion AF, Herren DB, Aeschlimann A, Schwyzer HK, et al. Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total shoulder arthroplasty: usefulness and validity of subjective outcome measures. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51: 81928.
  • 13
    Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Steiner W, Stucki G. Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF-36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60: 83440.
  • 14
    Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The Self-administered Comorbidity Questionaire (SCQ): a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49: 15663.
  • 15
    Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. 2nd ed. Lincoln (RI): QualityMetric Incorporated; 2000.
  • 16
    Bullinger M, Kirchberger I. SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand: Handanweisung. (The SF-36 questionnaire to assess health status: a manual). Göttingen: Hogrefe, 1998.
  • 17
    Katz JN, Larson MG, Phillips CB, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care 1992; 30: 91725.
  • 18
    Kurth BM, Ellert U. The SF-36 questionnaire and its usefulness in population studies: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey 1998. Soz Praeventivmed 2002; 47: 26677.
  • 19
    McConnell S, Beaton DE, Bombardier C. The DASH outcome measure: a user's manual. Toronto: Institute for Work & Health; 1999.
  • 20
    Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V. Measuring the whole or parts: validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001; 14: 12846.
  • 21
    American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons Web site. URL: http://www3.aaos.org/research/normstdy/main.cfm.
  • 22
    Offenbaecher M, Ewert T, Sangha O, Stucki G. Validation of a German version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH-G). J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 4012.
  • 23
    MacDermid JC. Outcome evaluation in patients with elbow pathology: issues in instrument development and evaluation. J Hand Ther 2001; 14: 10514.
  • 24
    King GJW, Richards RR, Zuckerman JD, Blasier R, Dillman C, Friedman RJ, et al, Research Committee, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. A standardized method for assessment of elbow function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999; 8: 3514.
  • 25
    Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of health status measures. Rosemont (IL): American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Institute for Work & Health; 1998.
  • 26
    John M, Angst F, Pap G, Junge A, Flury MP, Schwyzer HK, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the PREE (Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation) for German-speaking patients. J Elbow Hand Surg 2004; in press.
  • 27
    Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, Friedman R, Gartsman JM, Gristina AG, et al, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. A standardized method for the assessment of the shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1994; 3: 34752.
  • 28
    John M, Angst F, Pap G, Junge A, Flury MP, Schwyzer HK, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the mASES (modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons) questionnaire for German-speaking patients. J Elbow Hand Surg 2004; in press.
  • 29
    Turchin DC, Beaton DE, Richards RR. Validity of observer-based aggregate scoring systems as descriptor of elbow pain, function, and disability. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1998; 80A: 15462.
  • 30
    Morrey BF, Adams RA. Semiconstrained arthroplasty for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1992; 74A: 47990.
  • 31
    Angst F, Stucki G, Aeschlimann A. Quality of life assessment in osteoarthritis. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcome Res 2003; 3: 62336.
  • 32
    Morrey BF. Fractures of distal humerus. Orthop Clin North Am 2000; 31: 14554.
  • 33
    Garcia JA, Mykula R, Stanley D. Complex factures of the distal humerus in the elderly: the role of total elbow replacement as primary therapy. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2002; 84B: 8126.
  • 34
    Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and the use of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 2936.
  • 35
    World Health Organization (WHO). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001. p. 1020.