Drs. Goekoop-Ruiterman and de Vries-Bouwstra contributed equally to this work.
Research Article
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): A randomized, controlled trial
Article first published online: 28 OCT 2005
DOI: 10.1002/art.21405
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Rheumatology
Additional Information
How to Cite
Goekoop-Ruiterman, Y. P. M., De Vries-Bouwstra, J. K., Allaart, C. F., Van Zeben, D., Kerstens, P. J. S. M., Hazes, J. M. W., Zwinderman, A. H., Ronday, H. K., Han, K. H., Westedt, M. L., Gerards, A. H., Van Groenendael, J. H. L. M., Lems, W. F., Van Krugten, M. V., Breedveld, F. C. and Dijkmans, B. A. C. (2005), Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): A randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 52: 3381–3390. doi: 10.1002/art.21405
Publication History
- Issue published online: 28 OCT 2005
- Article first published online: 28 OCT 2005
- Manuscript Accepted: 9 AUG 2005
- Manuscript Received: 14 MAR 2005
Funded by
- Dutch College of Health Insurances
- Schering-Plough BV
- Centocor Inc.
REFERENCES
- 1, , , , , , et al. Influence of disease-modifying therapy on radiographic outcome in inflammatory polyarthritis at five years: results from a large observational inception study. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 46–53.Direct Link:
- 2, , , , , , et al. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis benefit from early second line therapy: 5-year follow-up of a prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study. J Rheumatol 1995; 22: 2208–13.
- 3, , , , , , et al. Early versus delayed treatment in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of two cohorts who received different treatment strategies. Am J Med 2001; 111: 446–51.
- 4, , , , , , et al. Delay to institution of therapy and induction of remission using single-drug or combination–disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 894–8.Direct Link:
- 5, , , , , , et al. The effectiveness of early treatment with “second-line” antirheumatic drugs: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1996; 124: 699–707.
- 6. Reevaluating the therapeutic approach to rheumatoid arthritis: the “sawtooth” strategy. J Rheumatol 1990; 17: 12–5.
- 7, , , , . Reduction in long-term disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by disease-modifying antirheumatic drug–based treatment strategies. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39: 616–22.Direct Link:
- 8, , . Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug use according to the ‘sawtooth’ treatment strategy improves the functional outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: results of a long-term follow-up study with review of the literature. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000; 39: 34–42.
- 9, , , , , , et al. Randomised comparison of combined step-down prednisolone, methotrexate and sulphasalazine with sulphasalazine alone in early rheumatoid arthritis [published erratum appears in Lancet 1998;351:220]. Lancet 1997; 350: 309–18.
- 10, , , , , , et al. Combination therapy versus monotherapy for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1999; 17: 699–704.
- 11, , , , , , et al. COBRA combination therapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: long-term structural benefits of a brief intervention. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 347–56.Direct Link:
- 12, , , , , , et al, and the FIN-RACo trial group. Comparison of combination therapy with single-drug therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 1568–73.
- 13, , , , , , et al. Cyclosporin A monotherapy versus cyclosporin A and methotrexate combination therapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a double blind randomized placebo controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 291–6.
- 14, , , , , . Radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis: a 12-month randomized controlled study comparing the combination of cyclosporin and methotrexate with methotrexate alone. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003; 42: 1545–9.
- 15, , , , , , et al. Infliximab in active early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 149–55.
- 16, , , , , , et al. Etanercept versus methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 1443–50.Direct Link:
- 17, , , , , , et al. Combination of infliximab and methotrexate therapy for early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 3432–43.Direct Link:
- 18, , , , , , et al. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with methotrexate alone, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine, or a combination of all three medications. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1287–91.
- 19, , , , , , et al, and The Methotrexate-Cyclosporine Combination Study Group. Combination therapy with cyclosporine and methotrexate in severe rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 137–41.
- 20, , , , , , et al, and the TEMPO (Trial of Etanercept and Methotrexate with Radiographic Patient Outcomes) study investigators. Therapeutic effect of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate compared with each treatment alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 675–81.
- 21, , , , , , et al, and the Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Trial in Rheumatoid Arthritis with Concomitant Therapy Study Group. Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1594–602.
- 22, , , , , , et al. A trial of etanercept, a recombinant tumor necrosis factor receptor:Fc fusion protein, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 253–9.
- 23, , , , , , et al. Effect of a treatment strategy of tight control for rheumatoid arthritis (the TICORA study): a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364: 263–9.
- 24, , , , , , et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988; 31: 315–24.Direct Link:
- 25, , , . Development of a disease activity score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologists. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 579–81.
- 26, , , , , . Development and validation of the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with the preliminary American College of Rheumatology and the World Health Organization/International League Against Rheumatism criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39: 34–40.Direct Link:
- 27, , , . Measurement of disability in Dutch rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin Rheumatol 1984; 3: 305–9.
- 28, , , , . Effects of hydroxychloroquine and sulphasalazine on progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 1989; 1: 1036–8.
- 29, . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between 2 methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–10.
- 30, , , , , , et al. Smallest detectable difference in radiological progression. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 731–9.
- 31, , , , , , et al. American College of Rheumatology preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 727–35.Direct Link:
- 32, , , , , . Remission in a prospective study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: American Rheumatism Association preliminary remission criteria in relation to the disease activity score. Br J Rheumatol 1996; 35: 1101–5.
- 33, , , , , , et al. Combination therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, controlled, double blind 52 week clinical trial of sulphasalazine and methotrexate compared with the single components. Ann Rheum Dis 1999; 58: 220–5.
- 34, , , . Combination of sulphasalazine and methotrexate versus the single components in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, controlled, double-blind, 52 week clinical trial. Br J Rheumatol 1997; 36: 1082–8.

1529-0131/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=897b81612b4ad6cae003112184adc709261d5f61)
1529-0131/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=04654f5ea3cbb01656383e0c0d04b16fd0a9a896)
1529-0131/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=104d5c2bb8ef72deba26790b855af7ab80697a0e)