SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, Bombardier C, Chernoff M, Fried B, et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum 1993; 36: 72940.
  • 2
    Van Riel PL. Provisional guidelines for measuring disease activity in clinical trials on rheumatoid arthritis [editorial]. Br J Rheumatol 1992; 31: 7934.
  • 3
    Smolen JS. The work of the EULAR Standing Committee on International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT) [editorial]. Br J Rheumatol 1992; 31: 21920.
  • 4
    Van Gestel AM, Prevoo ML, van 't Hof MA, van Rijswijk MH, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Development and validation of the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with the preliminary American College of Rheumatology and the World Health Organization/International League Against Rheumatism criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39: 3440.
  • 5
    Furst DE. Considerations on measuring decreased inflammatory synovitis. ILAR Bull 1994; 2: 1721.
  • 6
    Van Gestel AM, Anderson JJ, van Riel PL, Boers M, Haagsma CJ, Rich B, et al, and the American College of Rheumatology European League of Associations for Rheumatology. ACR and EULAR improvement criteria have comparable validity in rheumatoid arthritis trials. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 70511.
  • 7
    Van der Heijde DM, van 't Hof MA, van Riel PL, Theunisse LA, Lubberts EW, van Leeuwen MA, et al. Judging disease activity in clinical practice in rheumatoid arthritis: first step in the development of a disease activity score. Ann Rheum Dis 1990; 49: 91620.
  • 8
    Van der Heijde DM, van't Hof MA, van Riel PL, van Leeuwen MA, van Rijswijk MH, van de Putte LB. Validity of single variables and composite indices for measuring disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1992; 51: 17781.
  • 9
    Ritchie DM, Boyle JA, McInnes JM, Jasani MK, Dalakos TG, Grieveson P, et al. Clinical studies with an articular index for the assessment of joint tenderness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Q J Med 1968; 37: 393406.
  • 10
    Prevoo ML, van 't Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight–joint counts: development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 448.
  • 11
    Lansbury J. Report of a three-year study on the systemic and articular indexes in rheumatoid arthritis: theoretic and clinical considerations. Arthritis Rheum 1958; 1: 50522.
  • 12
    Fuchs HA, Pincus T. Reduced joint counts in controlled clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1994; 37: 4705.
  • 13
    Prevoo ML, van Riel PL, van 't Hof MA, van Rijswijk MH, van Leeuwen MA, Kuper HH, et al. Validity and reliability of joint indices: a longitudinal study in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1993; 32: 58994.
  • 14
    Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Eberl G, Jones I, Leeming M, Wylie GL, et al. Validity and reliability of the twenty-eight–joint count for the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis activity. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 3843.
  • 15
    American College of Rheumatology Committee on Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials. Reduced joint counts in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum 1994; 37: 4634.
  • 16
    Smolen JS. Report on the EULAR Standing Committee on International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials. Rheumatol Eur 1994; 23: 379.
  • 17
    Bellamy N. Weighting and aggregation. In: Musculoskeletal clinical metrology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1993. p. 4552.
  • 18
    Matsuda Y, Singh G, Yamanaka H, Tanaka E, Urano W, Taniguchi A, et al. Validation of a Japanese version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire in 3,763 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49: 7848.
  • 19
    Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988; 31: 31524.
  • 20
    Van Riel PL, van Gestel AM, van de Putte LB. Development and validation of response criteria in rheumatoid arthritis: steps towards an international consensus on prognostic markers. Br J Rheumatol 1996; 35 Suppl 2: 47.
  • 21
    Johnson K. Limitations in the usefulness of the 28-joint count: comment on the article by Fuchs and Pincus and the editorial by the American College of Rheumatology [letter]. Arthritis Rheum 1994; 37: 1712.
  • 22
    Fuchs HA, Brooks RH, Callahan LF, Pincus T. A simplified twenty-eight–joint quantitative articular index in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1989; 32: 5317.
  • 23
    Egger MJ, Huth DA, Ward JR, Reading JC, Williams HJ. Reduced joint count indices in the evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1985; 28: 6139.
  • 24
    Thompson PW, Silman AJ, Kirwan JR, Currey HL. Articular indices of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis: correlation with the acute-phase response. Arthritis Rheum 1987; 30: 61823.
  • 25
    Stewart MW, Palmer DG, Knight RG. A self-report articular index measure of arthritic activity: investigations of reliability, validity and sensitivity. J Rheumatol 1990; 17: 10115.