SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Weisman MH, Paulus HD, Russak SM, Lubeck DP, Chiou CF, Sengupta N, et al. Development of a new instrument for rheumatoid arthritis: the Cedars-Sinai Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument (CSHQ-RA). Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49: 7884.
  • 2
    Russak SM, Sherbourne CD, Lubeck DP, Paulus HD, Chiou CF, Sengupta N, et al. Validation of a rheumatoid arthritis health-related quality of life instrument, the CSHQ-RA. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49: 798803.
  • 3
    Patrick DL, Chiang YP. Measurement of health outcomes in treatment effectiveness evaluations: conceptual and methodological challenges. Med Care 2000; 38 Suppl: II1425.
  • 4
    Chiou CF, Sherbourne CD, Ofman J, Lee M, Lubeck DP, Paulus HE, et al. Development and validation of Cedars-Sinai Health-Related Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis (CSHQ-RA) short form instrument. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51: 35864.
  • 5
    Chiou CF, Sherbourne CD, Cornelio I, Lubeck DP, Paulus HE, Dylan M, et al. Revalidation of the original Cedars-Sinai Health-Related Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis (CSHQ-RA) short form instrument. J Rheum 2006; 33: 25662.
  • 6
    Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 47383.
  • 7
    Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
  • 8
    Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Nielson and Lydiche; 1960.
  • 9
    Andrich D. A binomial latent trait model for the study of Likert-style attitude questionnaires. Br J Math Stat Psychol 1978; 31: 8498.
  • 10
    Andrich D. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 1978; 43: 56173.
  • 11
    Andrich D. Application of a psychometric rating model to ordered categories which are scored with successive integers. Appl Psychol Meas 1978; 2: 58194.
  • 12
    Andrich D. Scaling attitude items constructed and scored in the Likert tradition. Educ Psychol Meas 1978; 38: 66580.
  • 13
    Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
  • 14
    Wells GA, Tugwell P, Kraag GR, Baker PR, Groh J, Redelmeier DA. Minimum important difference between patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the patient's perspective. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 55760.
  • 15
    Greenwood MC, Doyle DV, Ensor M. Does the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire have potential as a monitoring tool for subjects with rheumatoid arthritis? Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60: 3448.
  • 16
    Guzman J, Maetzel A, Peloso P, Yeung M, Bombardier C. Disability scores in DMARD trials: what is a clinically important change? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39 Suppl 9: S208.
  • 17
    Scientific Advisory Committee: instrument review criteria. Medical Outcomes Trust Bulletin I-IV. Waltham (MA): Medical Outcomes Trust; 1995.
  • 18
    Brunner HI, Klein-Gitelman MS, Miller MJ, Barron A, Baldwin N, Trombley M, et al. Minimal clinically important differences of the childhood health assessment questionnaire. J Rheumatol 2005; 32: 15061.
  • 19
    Kosinski M, Zhao SZ, Dedhiya S, Osterhaus JT, Ware JE Jr. Determining minimally important changes in generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43: 147887.