SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Carr AJ, Higginson IJ. Are quality of life measures patient centred? BMJ2001; 322: 135760.
  • 2
    Jones DL, Westby MD, Greidanus N, Johanson NA, Krebs DE, Robbins L, et al. Update on hip and knee arthroplasty: current state of evidence. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 77280.
  • 3
    Bijlsma JW. Patient centred outcomes in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 12.
  • 4
    The WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med 1998; 28: 5518.
  • 5
    The WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 14039.
  • 6
    Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA, and the WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial: a report from the WHOQOL Group. Qual Life Res 2004; 13: 299310.
  • 7
    Murphy B, Herrman H, Hawthorne G, Pinzone T, Evert H. Australian WHOQOL-100, WHOQOL-Bref and CA-WHOQOL instruments user's manual and interpretation guide. Melbourne: Australian WHOQOL Field Study Centre; 2000.
  • 8
    Noerholm V, Groenvold M, Watt T, Bjorner JB, Rasmussen NA, Bech P. Quality of life in the Danish general population: normative data and validity of WHOQOL-BREF using Rasch and item response theory models. Qual Life Res 2004; 13: 53140.
  • 9
    Taylor WJ, Myers J, Simpson RT, McPherson KM, Weatherall M. Quality of life of people with rheumatoid arthritis as measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument, Short Form (WHOQOL-BREF): score distributions and psychometric properties. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51: 3507.
  • 10
    Jang Y, Hsieh CL, Wang YH, Wu YH. A validity study of the WHOQOL-BREF assessment in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 18905.
  • 11
    Fang CT, Hsiung PC, Yu CF, Chen MY, Wang JD. Validation of the World Health Organization quality of life instrument in patients with HIV infection. Qual Life Res 2002; 11: 75362.
  • 12
    O'Carroll RE, Smith K, Couston M, Cossar JA, Hayes PC. A comparison of the WHOQOL-100 and the WHOQOL-BREF in detecting change in quality of life following liver transplantation. Qual Life Res 2000; 9: 1214.
  • 13
    Ackerman IN, Graves SE, Wicks IP, Bennell KL, Osborne RH. Severely compromised quality of life in women and those of lower socioeconomic status waiting for joint replacement surgery. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 6538.
  • 14
    Ackerman IN, Osborne RH. Integrating data to facilitate clinical research: a case study. Inform Prim Care 2005; 13: 26370.
  • 15
    Bellamy N. WOMAC: a 20-year experiential review of a patient-centered self-reported health status questionnaire. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 24736.
  • 16
    McConnell S, Kolopack P, Davis AM. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): a review of its utility and measurement properties. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 45: 45361.
  • 17
    Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Day N. Using the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) version 1. Melbourne: Monash University Centre for Health Program Evaluation; 2001.
  • 18
    Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Osborne R. The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 20924.
  • 19
    Hawthorne G, Osborne R. Population norms and meaningful differences for the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) measure. Aust N Z J Public Health 2005; 29: 13642.
  • 20
    Whitfield K, Buchbinder R, Segal L, Osborne RH. Parsimonious and efficient assessment of health-related quality of life in osteoarthritis research: validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; E-pubahead of print.
  • 21
    Osborne RH, Hawthorne G, Lew EA, Gray LC. Quality of life assessment in the community-dwelling elderly: validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument and comparison with the SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 13847.
  • 22
    Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med 2002; 32: 95976.
  • 23
    Department of Human Services. Victorian population health survey. Melbourne: Department of Human Services; 2002.
  • 24
    Australian Bureau of Statistics. Use of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale in ABS health surveys. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2001.
  • 25
    Andrews G, Slade T. Interpreting scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). Aust N Z J Public Health 2001; 25: 4947.
  • 26
    Pincus T, Summey JA, Soraci SA Jr, Wallston KA, Hummon NP. Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1983; 26: 134653.
  • 27
    Pincus T, Swearingen C, Wolfe F. Toward a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ): assessment of advanced activities of daily living and psychological status in the patient-friendly health assessment questionnaire format. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 222030.
  • 28
    Bruce B, Fries JF. The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: a review of its history, issues, progress, and documentation. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 16778.
  • 29
    Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Ritter PL, Laurent D, Hobbs M. Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Eff Clin Pract 2001; 4: 25662.
  • 30
    Katz JN, Larson MG, Phillips CB, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care 1992; 30: 91725.
  • 31
    Bellamy N. WOMAC osteoarthritis index: user guide version V. Brisbane; 2002.
  • 32
    Stanford Patient Education Research Centre. Stanford HAQ 8-item disability scale. URL: http://patienteducation.stanford.edu/research/haq8.html.
  • 33
    Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1989; 27 Suppl: S17889.
  • 34
    Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
  • 35
    Fayers P, Machin D. Quality of life: assessment, analysis and interpretation. Chichester: Wiley; 2000.
  • 36
    Ostendorf M, Buskens E, van Stel H, Schrijvers A, Marting L, Dhert W, et al. Waiting for total hip arthroplasty: avoidable loss in quality time and preventable deterioration. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19: 3029.
  • 37
    Stucki G, Stucki S, Bruhlmann P, Michel BA. Ceiling effects of the Health Assessment Questionnaire and its modified version in some ambulatory rheumatoid arthritis patients. Ann Rheum Dis 1995; 54: 4615.
  • 38
    Bachmeier CJ, March LM, Cross MJ, Lapsley HM, Tribe KL, Courtenay BG, et al, and the Arthritis Cost and Outcome Project Group. A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001; 9: 13746.
  • 39
    Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86A: 96374.
  • 40
    Jones CA, Beaupre LA, Johnston DW, Suarez-Almazor ME. Total joint arthroplasties: current concepts of patient outcomes after surgery. Clin Geriatr Med 2005; 21: 52742.