SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Badley EM, Rasooly I, Webster GK. Relative importance of musculoskeletal disorders as a cause of chronic health problems, disability, and health care utilization: findings from the 1990 Ontario Health Survey. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 50514.
  • 2
    The Centerrs for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of self-reported arthritis or chronic joint symptoms among adults: United States, 2001. JAMA 2002; 288: 31034.
  • 3
    Chang RW, Pellisier JM, Hazen GB. A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip. JAMA 1996; 275: 85865.
  • 4
    Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, Paul J, Dittus R, Croxford R, et al. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 16373.
  • 5
    Bunker JP, Frazier HS, Mosteller F. Improving health: measuring effects of medical care. Milbank Q 1994; 72: 22558.
  • 6
    Jonsson B, Larsson SE. Functional improvement and costs of hip and knee arthroplasty in destructive rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Scan J Rheumatol 1991; 20: 3517.
  • 7
    Liang MH, Larson M, Thompson M, Eaton H, McNamara E, Katz R, et al. Costs and outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1984; 27: 5229.
  • 8
    Figaro MK, Williams-Russo P, Allegrante JP. Expectation and outlook: the impact of patient preference on arthritis care among African Americans. J Ambul Care Manage 2005; 28: 418.
  • 9
    Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, Williams JI, Harvey B, Glazier R, et al. Determining the need for hip and knee arthroplasty: the role of clinical severity and patients' preferences. Med Care 2001; 39: 20616.
  • 10
    Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, Williams JI, Harvey B, Glazier R, et al. Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 101622.
  • 11
    Trousdale RT, McGrory BJ, Berry DJ, Becker MW, Harmsen WS. Patients' concerns prior to undergoing total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Mayo Clinic Proc 1999; 74: 97882.
  • 12
    Wright JG, Rudicel S, Feinstein AR. Ask patients what they want: evaluation of individual complaints before total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994; 76: 22934.
  • 13
    Hawker GA, Wright JG, Badley EM, Coyte PC, and the Toronto Arthroplasty Health Services Research Consortium. Perceptions of, and willingness to consider, total joint arthroplasty in a population-based cohort of individuals with disabling hip and knee arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51: 63541.
  • 14
    Figaro KM, Williams-Russo P, Allegrante JP. Preferences for arthritis care among urban African Americans: “I don't want to be cut.” Health Psychol 2004; 23: 3249.
  • 15
    Brander VA, Malhotra S, Jet J, Heinemann AW, Stulberg SD. Outcome of hip and knee arthroplasty in persons aged 80 years and older. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 345: 6778.
  • 16
    Karlson EW, Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Eaton HE, Katz JN. Gender differences in patient preferences may underlie differential utilization of elective surgery. Am J Med 1997; 102: 52430.
  • 17
    Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 191215.
  • 18
    Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol 1982; 37: 12247.
  • 19
    Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley; 1975.
  • 20
    Becker MH. The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Educ Monogr 1974; 2: 324473.
  • 21
    O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, Tetroe J, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H, et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. BMJ 1999; 319: 7314.
  • 22
    O'Connor AM, Fiset V, DeGrasse C, Graham ID, Evans W, Stacey D, et al. Decision aids for patients considering options affecting cancer outcomes: evidence of efficacy and policy implications. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999; 25: 6780.
  • 23
    Hycner RH. Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Hum Stud 1985; 8: 279303.
  • 24
    Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1998.
  • 25
    Johnson JM. In-depth interviewing. In: GubriumJF, HolsteinJA, editors. Handbook of interview research: context and method. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2002. p. 10319.
  • 26
    Berg BL. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Needham Heights (MA): Allyn and Bacon; 1995.
  • 27
    Holstein JA, Gubrium JF. Phenomenology, ethnomethodology and interpretive practice. In: DenzinNK, LincolnYS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1994. p. 26272.
  • 28
    Qualis Research. The Ethnograph v5.0 for Windows. London: Sage Publications Software; 1998.
  • 29
    Charmaz K. Struggling for a self: identity levels of the chronically ill. Res Sociol Health Care 1987; 6: 283321.
  • 30
    Goffman E. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1963.
  • 31
    Ballantyne PJ, Hawker G, Radoeva D. The extended self: illness experiences of older married arthritis sufferers. Res Sociol Health Care 2001; 19: 26182.
  • 32
    Baider L, Kaplan De-Nour A. Adjustment to cancer: who is the patient, the husband or the wife? Isr J Med Sci 1988; 24: 6316.
  • 33
    Northouse LL, Dorris G, Charron-Moore C. Factors affecting couples' adjustment to recurrent breast cancer. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 6976.
  • 34
    Turner RJ. Social support as a contingency in psychological well-being. J Health Soc Behav 1981; 22: 35767.
  • 35
    Kaplan BH, Cassel JC, Gore S. Social support and health. Med Care 1977; 15: 4758.
  • 36
    Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974; 185: 112431.
  • 37
    Bandura A. Social learning theories of identificatory processes. In: GoslinD, editor. Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally; 1969.
  • 38
    Bandura A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1977.
  • 39
    Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Ortho Rheumatol 1988; 1: 95108.