SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Davis RM, Wagner EG, Groves T. Advances in managing chronic disease: research, performance measurement, and quality improvement are key. BMJ 2000; 320: 5256.
  • 2
    Vliet Vlieland TP. Multidisciplinary team care and outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis [review]. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2004; 16: 1536.
  • 3
    Jelles F, van Bennekom CA, Lankhorst GJ. The interdisciplinary team conference in rehabilitation medicine. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74: 4645.
  • 4
    Wressle E, Lindstrand J, Neher M, Marcusson J, Henriksson C. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as an outcome measure and team tool in a day treatment programme. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 497506.
  • 5
    Steiner WA, Ryser L, Huber E, Uebelhart D, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 1098107.
  • 6
    Schochat T, Pilz C, Neuner R. The Indicators of Rehab Status questionnaire version 3 (IRES-3) in 1818 rehabilitees with musculoskeletal diseases. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 2003; 42: 23644. In German.
  • 7
    Buhrlen B, Gerdes N, Jackel WH. Development and psychometric testing of a patient questionnaire for medical rehabilitation (IRES-3). Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 2005; 44: 6374. In German.
  • 8
    Van Bennekom CA, Jelles F, Lankhorst GJ. Rehabilitation Activities Profile: the ICIDH as a framework for a problem-oriented assessment method in rehabilitation medicine [review]. Disabil Rehabil 1995; 17: 16975.
  • 9
    World Health Organization. ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
  • 10
    World Health Organization. ICIDH: International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicap. Geneva: WHO; 1980.
  • 11
    Stamm TA, Cieza A, Coenen M, Machold KP, Nell VP, Smolen JS, et al. Validating the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Comprehensive Core Set for Rheumatoid Arthritis from the patient perspective: a qualitative study. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 4319.
  • 12
    Beckerman H, Roelofsen E, Knol D, Lankhorst G. The value of the Rehabilitation Activities Profile (RAP) as a quality sub-system in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 387400.
  • 13
    Robson C. Real World Research: a resource for social scientists and practitioners. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers; 2002.
  • 14
    Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988; 31: 31524.
  • 15
    Tijhuis GJ, Zwinderman AH, Hazes JM, Breedveld FC, Vlieland PM. Two-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of a clinical nurse specialist intervention, inpatient, and day patient team care in rheumatoid arthritis. J Adv Nurs 2003; 41: 3443.
  • 16
    Van den Hout WB, Tijhuis GJ, Hazes JM, Breedveld FC, Vliet Vlieland TP. Cost effectiveness and cost utility analysis of multidisciplinary care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised comparison of clinical nurse specialist care, inpatient team care, and day patient care. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 30815.
  • 17
    Tugwell P, Bombardier C, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Grace E, Hanna B. The MACTAR Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire: an individualized functional priority approach for assessing improvement in physical disability in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1987; 14: 44651.
  • 18
    Verhoeven AC, Boers M, van der Linden S. Validity of the MACTAR questionnaire as a functional index in a rheumatoid arthritis clinical trial. J Rheumatol 2000; 27: 28019.
  • 19
    Siegert CE, Vleming LJ, Vandenbroucke JP, Cats A. Measurement of disability in Dutch rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin Rheumatol 1984; 3: 3059.
  • 20
    De Jong Z, van der Heijde DM, McKenna SP, Whalley D. The reliability and construct validity of the RAQoL: a rheumatoid arthritis-specific quality of life instrument. Br J Rheumatol 1997; 36: 87883.
  • 21
    Riemsma RP, Taal E, Rasker JJ, Houtman PM, van Paassen HC, Wiegman O. Evaluation of a Dutch version of the AIMS2 for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1996; 35: 75560.
  • 22
    Evers AW, Taal E, Kraaimaat FW, Jacobs JW, Abdel-Nasser A, Rasker JJ, et al. A comparison of two recently developed health status instruments for patients with arthritis: Dutch-AIMS2 and IRGL. Br J Rheumatol 1998; 37: 15764.
  • 23
    Prevoo ML, van 't Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts: development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 448.
  • 24
    Van Gestel AM, Anderson JJ, van Riel PL, Boers M, Haagsma CJ, Rich B, et al, and the American College of Rheumatology European League of Associations for Rheumatology. ACR and EULAR improvement criteria have comparable validity in rheumatoid arthritis trials. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 70511.
  • 25
    Tijhuis GJ, Kooiman KG, Zwinderman AH, Hazes JM, Breedveld FC, Vliet Vlieland TP. Validation of a novel satisfaction questionnaire for patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving outpatient clinical nurse specialist care, inpatient care, or day patient team care. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49: 1939.
  • 26
    Boers M, Verhoeven AC, Markusse HM, van de Laar MA, Westhovens R, van Denderen JC, et al. Randomised comparison of combined step-down prednisolone, methotrexate and sulphasalazine with sulphasalazine alone in early rheumatoid arthritis [published erratum appears in Lancet 1998;351:220]. Lancet 1997; 350: 30918.
  • 27
    Lambert CM, Hurst NP, Forbes JF, Lochhead A, Macleod M, Nuki G. Is day care equivalent to inpatient care for active rheumatoid arthritis? Randomised controlled clinical and economic evaluation. BMJ 1998; 316: 9659.