SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Taylor WJ, McPherson K. Using Rasch analysis to compare the psychometric properties of the Short Form 36 Physical Function score and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index in people with psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57: 7239.
  • 2
    The College Board. Test characteristics of the SAT Reasoning Test: reliability, difficulty levels, completion rates (March 2005–June 2006). URL: http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/highered/ra/sat/sat-test-characteristics.pdf.
  • 3
    Wolfe F, Michaud K, Pincus T. Development and validation of the health assessment questionnaire. II. A revised version of the health assessment questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 3296305.
  • 4
    Wolfe F. Which HAQ is best? A comparison of the HAQ, MHAQ and RA-HAQ, a difficult 8 item HAQ (DHAQ), and a rescored 20 item HAQ (HAQ20): analyses in 2,491 rheumatoid arthritis patients following leflunomide initiation. J Rheumatol 2001; 28: 9829.
  • 5
    RUNMC. DAS-Score.NL. URL: http://www.das-score.nl/www.das-score.nl/.
  • 6
    Lassere MN, van der Heijde D, Johnson KR, Boers M, Edmonds J. Reliability of measures of disease activity and disease damage in rheumatoid arthritis: implications for smallest detectable difference, minimal clinically important difference, and analysis of treatment effects in randomized controlled trials. J Rheumatol 2001; 28: 892903.
  • 7
    Kvien TK, Uhlig T, Mowinckel P, Pincus T. Test-retest reliability of DAS-28 and other standard assessment tools in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: defining cut-offs for changes exceeding the measurement error [abstract]. Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 64: 213.
  • 8
    Schmitt JS, Di Fabio RP. Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. J Clin Epidemiol 2004; 57: 100818.
  • 9
    Greenwood MC, Doyle DV, Ensor M. Does the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire have potential as a monitoring tool for subjects with rheumatoid arthritis? Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60: 3448.
  • 10
    Wolfe F, Pincus T, Fries JF. Usefulness of the HAQ in the clinic [letter]. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60: 811.
  • 11
    Wolfe F, Michaud K, Strand V. Expanding the definition of clinical differences: from minimally clinically important differences to really important differences: analyses in 8,931 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2005; 32: 5839.