SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care 1989; 27 Suppl 3: 21732.
  • 2
    Bellamy N. Outcome measurement in osteoarthritis clinical trials. J Rheumatol 1995; 22 Suppl 43: 4951.
  • 3
    Stucki G, Kroeling P. Principles of rehabilitation. In: HochbergMC, SilmanAS, SmolenJS, WeinblattME, WeismanMH, editors. Rheumatology. 3rd ed. London: Mosby; 2002.
  • 4
    Angst F, Stucki G, Aeschlimann A. Quality of life assessment in osteoarthritis. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcome Res 2003; 3: 62336.
  • 5
    Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Steiner W, Stucki G. Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF-36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60: 83440.
  • 6
    Angst F, Pap G, Mannion AF, Herren DB, Aeschlimann A, Schwyzer HK, et al. Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total shoulder arthroplasty: usefulness and validity of subjective outcome measures. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51: 81928.
  • 7
    Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Michel BA, Stucki G. Minimal clinically important rehabilitation effects in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 1318.
  • 8
    Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Control Clin Trials 1991; 12: 142S58S.
  • 9
    Boers M, Brooks P, Strand VC, Tugwell P. The OMERACT filter for outcome measures in rheumatology [editorial]. J Rheumatol 1998; 25: 1989.
  • 10
    Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. 2nd ed. Lincoln (RI): QualityMetric Incorporated; 2000.
  • 11
    Bullinger M, Kirchberger I. Der SF-36 fragebogen zum gesundheitszustand: handbuch für die deutschsprachige fragebogenversion. Göttingen (Germany): Hogrefe Verlag; 1998.
  • 12
    McConnell S, Beaton DE, Bombardier C. The DASH outcome measure: a user's manual. Toronto (ON): Institute for Work & Health; 1999.
  • 13
    Offenbaecher M, Ewert T, Sangha O, Stucki G. Validation of a German version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH-G). J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 4012.
  • 14
    Roach KE, Budiman-Mak E, Songsiridej N, Lertrantanakul Y. Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care Res 1991; 4: 1439.
  • 15
    Angst F, Goldhahn J, Pap G, Mannion AF, Roach KE, Siebertz D, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the German Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007; 46: 8792.
  • 16
    Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, Friedman R, Gartsman JM, Gristina AG, et al, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. A standardized method for the assessment of the shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1994; 3: 34752.
  • 17
    Goldhahn J, Angst F, Drerup S, John M, Simmen BR, Mannion AF. Lessons learned during the cross-cultural adaptation into German of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder form. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 25: 195205.
  • 18
    Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 1987; 214: 1604.
  • 19
    Constant CR. Assessment of shoulder function. Orthopade 1991; 20: 28994. In German.
  • 20
    Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1989; 27 Suppl 3: S17889.
  • 21
    Rosenthal R. Parametric measures of effect size. In: CooperH, HedgesLV, editors. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1994. p. 23144.
  • 22
    Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care 1990; 28: 63242.
  • 23
    Bessette L, Sangha O, Kuntz KM, Keller RB, Lew RA, Fossel AH, et al. Comparative responsiveness of generic versus disease-specific and weighted versus unweighted health status measures in carpal tunnel syndrome. Med Care 1998; 36: 491502.
  • 24
    Rosner B. Multiple comparisons: Bonferroni approach. In: RosnerB, editor. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 5th ed. Pacific Grove (CA): Duxbury (Thomson Learning); 2000. p. 52730.
  • 25
    Wyrwich KW, Wolinsky FD. Identifying meaningful intra-individual change standards for health-related quality of life measures. J Eval Clin Pract 2000; 6: 3949.
  • 26
    Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and the use of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 2936.
  • 27
    Van der Windt AW, van der Heijden GJ, de Winter AF, Koes MW, Deville W, Bouter LM. The responsiveness of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire. Ann Rheum Dis 1998; 57: 827.
  • 28
    Beaton DE, Richards RR. Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998; 7: 56572.
  • 29
    Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V. Measuring the whole or parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001; 14: 12846.
  • 30
    Lo IK, Litchfield RB, Griffin S, Faber K, Patterson SD, Kirkley A. Quality-of-life outcome following hemiarthroplasty of total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87-A: 217885.
  • 31
    Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989; 10: 40715.
  • 32
    Thomas M, Dieball O, Busse M. Normal values of the shoulder strength in dependence on age and gender: comparison with the constant, UCLA, ASES scores and SF-36 health survey. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2003; 141: 16070. In German.
  • 33
    Heald SL, Riddle DL, Lamb RL. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: the construct validity and responsiveness of a region-specific disability measure. Phys Ther 1997; 77: 107989.
  • 34
    Yian EH, Ramappa AJ, Arneberg O, Gerber C. The constant score in normal shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14: 12833.
  • 35
    Simmonds MJ, Olson SL, Jones S, Hussein T, Lee EC, Novy D, et al. Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain. Spine 1998; 23: 241221.
  • 36
    Doornberg JB, Ring D, Fabian LM, Malhotra L, Zurakowski D, Jupiter JB. Pain dominates measurement of elbow function and health status. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87-A: 172531.
  • 37
    Ware JE, Kosinski M. SF-36 physical and mental summary scales: a manual for users of version 1. 2nd ed. Lincoln (RI): QualityMetric Incorporated; 2004.
  • 38
    Cook KF, Roddey TS, Olson SL, Gartsman GM, Valenzuela FF, Hanten WP. Reliability of surgical status of self-reported outcomes in patients who have shoulder pathologies. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2002; 32: 33646.
  • 39
    Boehm D, Wollmerstedt N, Doesch M, Handwerker M, Mehling E, Gohlke F. Development of a questionnaire based on the Constant (Murley) Score for patient self-evaluation of the shoulder function by patients. Unfallchirurg 2004; 107: 397402. In German.