Disability in valued life activities among individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus

Authors

  • Patricia Katz,

    Corresponding author
    1. Rosalind Russell Medical Research Center, and the University of California, San Francisco
    • Arthritis Research Group, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California Street, Suite 270, San Francisco, CA 94143-0920
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Because Drs. Katz and Yelin are Editors of Arthritis Care & Research, review of this article was handled by the Editor of Arthritis & Rheumatism.

  • Anne Morris,

    1. Rosalind Russell Medical Research Center, and the University of California, San Francisco
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Laura Trupin,

    1. Rosalind Russell Medical Research Center, and the University of California, San Francisco
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jinoos Yazdany,

    1. Rosalind Russell Medical Research Center, and the University of California, San Francisco
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Edward Yelin

    1. Rosalind Russell Medical Research Center, and the University of California, San Francisco
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Because Drs. Katz and Yelin are Editors of Arthritis Care & Research, review of this article was handled by the Editor of Arthritis & Rheumatism.


Abstract

Objective

To identify the prevalence of disability in a wide range of valued life activities (VLAs) among individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 1-year changes in such disability, and predictors of and changes in VLA disability.

Methods

Data were from 2 waves of a cohort of 829 individuals with SLE interviewed annually by telephone. VLA disability was assessed using a scale rating the difficulty of performing 21 activities. Scores were also calculated for subscales corresponding to obligatory, committed, and discretionary activities. Changes in VLA disability from baseline to 1-year followup were assessed. Sociodemographic and disease status measures were examined as predictors of and changes in VLA disability using multiple regression analyses.

Results

Almost half of the subjects were unable to perform ≥1 VLA at baseline. Almost all (91%) reported ≥1 VLA affected by SLE. One-quarter of the subjects experienced a significant increase in the number of activities they were unable to perform; approximately half experienced significant increases in the number of activities affected and in difficulty scores. Proportions of individuals whose disability increased and whose disability decreased were roughly equivalent. Disease status measures accounted for 62–72% of the variation in VLA difficulty. More severe disease status was predictive of increases in VLA difficulty; few predictors of improvements were identified.

Conclusion

VLA disability was common, with more disability noted in committed and discretionary activities than in obligatory activities. Because VLA disability has been linked to psychological well-being in previous studies, identification of factors that may protect against such disability is important.

Ancillary