SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Michelson J, Easley M, Wigley FM, Hellmann D. Foot and ankle problems in rheumatoid arthritis. Foot Ankle Int 1994; 15: 60813.
  • 2
    Vainio K. The rheumatoid foot: a clinical study with pathological and roentgenological comments. Ann Chir Gyneacol Fenn Suppl 1956; 45: 1107.
  • 3
    Wickman AM, Pinzur MS, Kadanoff R, Juknelis D. Health-related quality of life for patients with rheumatoid arthritis foot involvement. Foot Ankle Int 2004; 25: 1926.
  • 4
    Bowen CJ, Burridge J, Arden N. Podiatry interventions in the rheumatoid foot. Br J Podiatry 2007; 8: 7682.
  • 5
    Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Lalonde KA, Conti S. Current concepts review: foot and ankle outcome instruments. Foot Ankle Int 2006; 27: 38390.
  • 6
    Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J, de Vet HC. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 33541.
  • 7
    Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Steultjens MP, Dekker J. Performance-based methods for measuring the physical function of patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of measurement properties. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006; 45: 890902.
  • 8
    Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 3442.
  • 9
    De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 10339.
  • 10
    Giraudeau B, Mary JY. Planning a reproducibility study: how many subjects and how many replicates per subject for an expected width of the 95 per cent confidence interval of the intraclass correlation coefficient. Stat Med 2001; 20: 320514.
  • 11
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 30710.
  • 12
    Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 2003; 41: 58292.
  • 13
    De Vet HC, Ader HJ, Terwee CB, Pouwer F. Are factor analytical techniques used appropriately in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analysis of the SF-36. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 120318.
  • 14
    Lohr KN, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, Burnam MA, Patrick DL, Perrin EB, et al. Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria. Clin Ther 1996; 18: 97992.
  • 15
    Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 6229.
  • 16
    McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 293307.
  • 17
    Guyatt GH, Deyo RA, Charlson M, Levine MN, Mitchell A. Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: a clarification. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 4038.
  • 18
    Van der Leeden M, Dekker JH, Siemonsma PC, Lek-Westerhof SS, Steultjens MP. Reproducibility of plantar pressure measurements in patients with chronic arthritis: a comparison of one-step, two-step, and three-step protocols and an estimate of the number of measurements required. Foot Ankle Int 2004; 25: 73944.
  • 19
    Firth J, Turner D, Smith W, Woodburn J, Helliwell P. The validity and reliability of PressureStat for measuring plantar foot pressures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2007; 22: 6036.
  • 20
    Rome K, Hanchard NC. Within-day reliability of temporal-spatial gait parameters associated with rheumatoid arthritic feet. Musculoskeletal Care 2005; 3: 1723.
  • 21
    Fransen M, Edmonds J. Gait variables: appropriate objective outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 1999; 38: 6637.
  • 22
    Woodburn J, Nelson KM, Siegel KL, Kepple TM, Gerber LH. Multisegment foot motion during gait: proof of concept in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2004; 31: 191827.
  • 23
    Woodburn J, Turner DE, Helliwell PS, Barker S. A preliminary study determining the feasibility of electromagnetic tracking for kinematics at the ankle joint complex. Rheumatology (Oxford) 1999; 38: 12608.
  • 24
    Buchbinder R, Bombardier C, Yeung M, Tugwell P. Which outcome measures should be used in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials? Clinical and quality-of-life measures' responsiveness to treatment in a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 156880.
  • 25
    Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, Bombardier C, Furst D, Goldsmith C, et al. American College of Rheumatology preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 72735.
  • 26
    Baumhauer JF, Nawoczenski DA, DiGiovanni BF, Wilding GE. Reliability and validity of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scale: a pilot study for the hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 2006; 27: 10149.
  • 27
    Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE. The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 56170.
  • 28
    Saag KG, Saltzman CL, Brown CK, Budiman-Mak E. The Foot Function Index for measuring rheumatoid arthritis pain: evaluating side-to-side reliability. Foot Ankle Int 1996; 17: 50610.
  • 29
    Helliwell P, Reay N, Gilworth G, Redmond A, Slade A, Tennant A, et al. Development of a foot impact scale for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 41822.
  • 30
    Sullivan M, Ahlmen M, Bjelle A. Health status assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. I. Further work on the validity of the sickness impact profile. J Rheumatol 1990; 17: 43947.
  • 31
    McCloy L, Jongbloed L. Robinson Bashall Functional Assessment for arthritis patients: reliability and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 4869.
  • 32
    Grace EM, Gerecz EM, Kassam YB, Buchanan HM, Buchanan WW, Tugwell PS. 50-foot walking time: a critical assessment of an outcome measure in clinical therapeutic trials of antirheumatic drugs. Br J Rheumatol 1988; 27: 3724.
  • 33
    Spiegel JS, Paulus HE, Ward NB, Spiegel TM, Leake B, Kane RL. What are we measuring? An examination of walk time and grip strength. J Rheumatol 1987; 14: 806.
  • 34
    Ward MM. Clinical measures in rheumatoid arthritis: which are most useful in assessing patients? J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 1727.
  • 35
    Hamilton J, Brydson G, Fraser S, Grant M. Walking ability as a measure of treatment effect in early rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 1427.
  • 36
    Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Pollard WE, Martin DP, Gilson BS. The sickness impact profile: validation of a health status measure. Med Care 1976; 14: 5767.
  • 37
    Moeckel BH, Sculco TP, Alexiades MM, Dossick PH, Inglis AE, Ranawat CS. The double-stemmed silicone-rubber implant for rheumatoid arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74: 56470.
  • 38
    Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 1994; 15: 34953.
  • 39
    Wolfe F, Kong SX. Rasch analysis of the Western Ontario MacMaster questionnaire (WOMAC) in 2205 patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia. Ann Rheum Dis 1999; 58: 5638.
  • 40
    Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 183340.
  • 41
    Garrow AP, Papageorgiou AC, Silman AJ, Thomas E, Jayson MI, Macfarlane GJ. Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess disabling foot pain. Pain 2000; 85: 10713.