SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Ball J. Enthesopathy of rheumatoid and ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 1971; 30: 21323.
  • 2
    Ball J. The enthesopathy of ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Rheumatol 1983; 22: 258.
  • 3
    D'Agostino MA, Olivieri I. Enthesitis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2006; 20: 47386.
  • 4
    Feldtkeller E, Bruckel J, Khan MA. Scientific contributions of ankylosing spondylitis patient advocacy groups. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2000; 12: 23947.
  • 5
    Kidd BL, Cawley MI. Delay in diagnosis of spondarthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1988; 27: 2302.
  • 6
    Song IH, Sieper J, Rudwaleit M. Diagnosing early ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2007; 9: 36774.
  • 7
    Grassi W, Salaffi F, Filippucci E. Ultrasound in rheumatology. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2005; 19: 46785.
  • 8
    Brown AK, Roberts TE, Wakefield RJ, Karim Z, Hensor E, O'Connor PJ, et al. The challenges of integrating ultrasonography into routine rheumatology practice: addressing the needs of clinical rheumatologists. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007; 46: 8219.
  • 9
    Lehtinen A, Taavitsainen M, Leirisalo-Repo M. Sonographic analysis of enthesopathy in the lower extremities of patients with spondylarthropathy. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1994; 12: 1438.
  • 10
    Balint PV, Kane D, Wilson H, McInnes IB, Sturrock RD. Ultrasonography of entheseal insertions in the lower limb in spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61: 90510.
  • 11
    D'Agostino MA, Said-Nahal R, Hacquard-Bouder C, Brasseur JL, Dougados M, Breban M. Assessment of peripheral enthesitis in the spondylarthropathies by ultrasonography combined with power Doppler: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 52333.
  • 12
    Alcalde M, Acebes JC, Cruz M, Gonzalez-Hombrado L, Herrero-Beaumont G, Sanchez-Pernaute O. A sonographic enthesitic index of lower limbs is a valuable tool in the assessment of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 66: 10159.
  • 13
    De Miguel E, Cobo T, Munoz-Fernandez S, Naredo E, Uson J, Acebes JC, et al. Validity of enthesis ultrasound assessment in spondylarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis 2008. E-pub ahead of print. URL: http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/rapidpdf/ard.2007.084251v1.
  • 14
    Kiris A, Kaya A, Ozgocmen S, Kocakoc E. Assessment of enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis by power Doppler ultrasonography. Skeletal Radiol 2006; 35: 5228.
  • 15
    Baraliakos X, Davis J, Tsuji W, Braun J. Magnetic resonance imaging examinations of the spine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis before and after therapy with the tumor necrosis factor α receptor fusion protein etanercept. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52: 121623.
  • 16
    Baraliakos X, Hermann KG, Landewe R, Listing J, Golder W, Brandt J, et al. Assessment of acute spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis by magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison between contrast enhanced T1 and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 11414.
  • 17
    Baraliakos X, Landewe R, Hermann KG, Listing J, Golder W, Brandt J, et al. Inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic description of the extent and frequency of acute spinal changes using magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 7304.
  • 18
    Landewe RB, Hermann KG, van der Heijde DM, Baraliakos X, Jurik AG, Lambert RG, et al. Scoring sacroiliac joints by magnetic resonance imaging: a multiple-reader reliability experiment. J Rheumatol 2005; 32: 20505.
  • 19
    Van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Hermann KG, Rudwaleit M, Ostergaard M, Oostveen A, et al. Is there a preferred method for scoring activity of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging in ankylosing spondylitis? J Rheumatol 2007; 34: 8713.
  • 20
    McGonagle D, Khan MA, Marzo-Ortega H, O'Connor P, Gibbon W, Emery P. Enthesitis in spondyloarthropathy. Curr Opin Rheumatol 1999; 11: 24450.
  • 21
    McGonagle D, Lories RJ, Tan AL, Benjamin M. The concept of a “synovio-entheseal complex” and its implications for understanding joint inflammation and damage in psoriatic arthritis and beyond. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 56: 248291.
  • 22
    McGonagle D, Marzo-Ortega H, O'Connor P, Gibbon W, Hawkey P, Henshaw K, et al. Histological assessment of the early enthesitis lesion in spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61: 5347.
  • 23
    Canoso JJ. The premiere enthesis. J Rheumatol 1998; 25: 12546.
  • 24
    Canoso JJ. Bursae, tendons and ligaments. Clin Rheum Dis 1981; 7: 189221.
  • 25
    McGonagle D, Benjamin M, Marzo-Ortega H, Emery P. Advances in the understanding of entheseal inflammation. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2002; 4: 5006.
  • 26
    Balint PV, Mandl P, Kane D. “All that glistens is not gold”: separating artefacts from true Doppler signals in rheumatological ultrasound [editorial]. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 1412.
  • 27
    Newman JS, Adler RS. Power doppler sonography: applications in musculoskeletal imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 1998; 2: 33140.
  • 28
    Torp-Pedersen ST, Terslev L. Settings and artefacts relevant in colour/power Doppler ultrasound in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 1439.
  • 29
    D'Agostino MA, Breban M, Said-Nahal R, Dougados M. Refractory inflammatory heel pain in spondylarthropathy: a significant response to infliximab documented by ultrasound [letter]. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 8401.
  • 30
    Kadam UT, Jordan K, Croft PR. A comparison of two consensus methods for classifying morbidities in a single professional group showed the same outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 116973.
  • 31
    Amor B, Dougados M, Mijiyawa M. Criteria of the classification of spondylarthropathies. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 1990; 57: 859. In French.
  • 32
    Dougados M, van der Linden S, Juhlin R, Huitfeldt B, Amor B, Calin A, et al, and The European Spondylarthropathy Study Group. The European Spondylarthropathy Study Group preliminary criteria for the classification of spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 1991; 34: 121827.
  • 33
    Van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis: a proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1984; 27: 3618.
  • 34
    Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 228691.
  • 35
    Conger A. Integration and generalisation of kappas for multiple raters. Psychol Bull 1980; 88: 3228.
  • 36
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 15974.
  • 37
    Scheel AK, Schmidt WA, Hermann KG, Bruyn GA, D'Agostino MA, Grassi W, et al. Interobserver reliability of rheumatologists performing musculoskeletal ultrasonography: results from a EULAR “Train the trainers” course. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 10439.
  • 38
    Naredo E, Moller I, Moragues C, de Agustin JJ, Scheel AK, Grassi W, et al. Interobserver reliability in musculoskeletal ultrasonography: results from a “Teach the Teachers” rheumatologist course. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 149.
  • 39
    Bruyn GA, Naredo E, Moller I, Moragues C, Garrido J, de Bock GH, et al. Reliability of ultrasonography in detecting shoulder disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2008. E-pub ahead of print.
  • 40
    Kavanagh EC, Koulouris G, Parker L, Morrison WB, Bergin D, Zoga AC, et al. Does extended-field-of-view sonography improve interrater reliability for the detection of rotator cuff muscle atrophy? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: 2731.
  • 41
    Koski JM, Saarakkala S, Helle M, Hakulinen U, Heikkinen JO, Hermunen H, et al. Assessing the intra- and inter-reader reliability of dynamic ultrasound images in power Doppler ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 165860.
  • 42
    Joshua F, Lassere M, Bruyn GA, Szkudlarek M, Naredo E, Schmidt WA, et al. Summary findings of a systematic review of the ultrasound assessment of synovitis. J Rheumatol 2007; 34: 83947.
  • 43
    Koski JM, Saarakkala S, Helle M, Hakulinen U, Heikkinen JO, Hermunen H. Power Doppler ultrasonography and synovitis: correlating ultrasound imaging with histopathological findings and evaluating the performance of ultrasound equipments. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 15905.
  • 44
    Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa. I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43: 5439.
  • 45
    Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 4239.