SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1991; 14: 40915.
  • 2
    Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Cheng I, Carroll LJ, Nordin M, Guzman J, et al. Treatment of neck pain: injections and surgical interventions. Results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Spine 2008; 33: S15369.
  • 3
    Niemisto L, Kalso E, Malmivaara A, Seitsalo S, Hurri H. Radiofrequency denervation for neck and back pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; 1: CD004058.
  • 4
    Pietrobon R, Coeytaux RR, Carey TS, Richardson WJ, DeVellis RF. Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction: a systematic review. Spine 2002; 27: 51522.
  • 5
    Bommireddy R, Kamat A, Smith ET, Nixon T, Pillay R, Pigott T, et al. Magnetic resonance image findings in the early post-operative period after anterior cervical discectomy. Eur Spine J 2007; 16: 2731.
  • 6
    Hacker RJ. Cervical disc arthroplasty: a controlled randomized prospective study with intermediate follow-up results. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 3: 4248.
  • 7
    Jacobs WC, Anderson PG, Limbeek J, Willems PC, Pavlov P. Single or double-level anterior interbody fusion techniques for cervical degenerative disc disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 4: CD004958.
  • 8
    Kim SH, Shin DA, Yi S, Yoon DH, Kim KN, Shin HC. Early results from posterior cervical fusion with a screw-rod system. Yonsei Med J 2007; 48: 4408.
  • 9
    Latimer M, Haden N, Seeley HM, Laing RJ. Measurement of outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated surgically. Br J Neurosurg 2002; 16: 5459.
  • 10
    Mehren C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F, Barsa P, Sourkova P, Hradil J, et al. Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine 2006; 31: 28026.
  • 11
    Peolsson A, Vavruch L, Hedlund R. Long-term randomised comparison between a carbon fibre cage and the Cloward procedure in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 2007; 16: 1738.
  • 12
    Verhagen AP, Scholten-Peeters GG, van WS, de Bie RA, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Conservative treatments for whiplash. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 2: CD003338.
  • 13
    Yoon DH, Yi S, Shin HC, Kim KN, Kim SH. Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006; 148: 94350.
  • 14
    Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980; 66: 2713.
  • 15
    Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Palmer JA. The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and patient-specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine 2006; 31: 598602.
  • 16
    Pool JJ, Ostelo RW, Hoving JL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Minimal clinically important change of the Neck Disability Index and the numerical rating scale for patients with neck pain. Spine 2007; 32: 304751.
  • 17
    Stratford PW, Riddle DL, Binkley JM, Spadoni G, Westaway MD, Padfield B. Using the Neck Disability Index to make decisions concerning individual patients. Physiother Can 1999; 51: 10712.
  • 18
    Spector PE. Summated rating scale construction: an introduction. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1992.
  • 19
    Tennant A, McKenna SP, Hagell P. Application of Rasch analysis in the development and application of quality of life instruments. Value Health 2004; 7 Suppl 1: S22–6.
  • 20
    DeVellis RF. A consumer's guide to finding, evaluating, and reporting on measurement instruments. Arthritis Care Res 1996; 9: 23945.
  • 21
    Stevens SS. Mathematics, measurement, and psychophysics. In: PashlerH, YantisS, MedinD, GallistelR, WixtedJ, editors. Handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley; 2004.
  • 22
    Luce RD, Tukey JW. Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new type of fundamental measurement. J Math Psychol 1964; 1: 127.
  • 23
    Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 2000.
  • 24
    Chok B, Gomez E. The reliability and application of the Neck Disability Index in physiotherapy. Physiother Singapore 2003; 3: 169.
  • 25
    Hains F, Waalen J, Mior S. Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1998; 21: 7580.
  • 26
    Bronfort G, Evans R, Nelson B, Aker PD, Goldsmith CH, Vernon H. A randomized clinical trial of exercise and spinal manipulation for patients with chronic neck pain. Spine 2001; 26: 78897.
  • 27
    Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Harber P, Kominski GF, Yu F, Adams AH. A randomized trial of chiropractic manipulation and mobilization for patients with neck pain: clinical outcomes from the UCLA neck-pain study. Am J Public Health 2002; 92: 163441.
  • 28
    Linacre JM. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Meas Trans 1994; 7: 32831.
  • 29
    Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago; 1960.
  • 30
    Pallant JF, Tennant A. An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol 2007; 46: 118.
  • 31
    Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57: 135862.
  • 32
    Cronbach LJ. Coefficient α and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297334.
  • 33
    Lohr KN, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, Burnam MA, Patrick DL, Perrin EB, et al. Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria. Clin Ther 1996; 18: 97991.
  • 34
    Andrich D. Rasch models for measurement. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1988.
  • 35
    Thissen D, Steinberg L. Data analysis using item response theory. Psychol Bull 1988; 104: 38595.
  • 36
    Smith EV Jr. Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas 2002; 3: 20531.
  • 37
    Luo G, Andrich D. Estimating parameters in the Rasch Model in the presence of null categories. J Appl Meas 2005; 6: 12846.
  • 38
    Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 1982; 47: 14974.
  • 39
    Marais I, Luo G, Andrich D. RUMMss simulation studies program user manual. Report no. 9: maintaining invariant scales in state, national, and international level assessments. Perth, Australia: Murdoch University; 2008.
  • 40
    Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 2: 4208.
  • 41
    Wlodyka-Demaille S, Poiraudeau S, Catanzariti JF, Rannou F, Fermanian J, Revel M. The ability to change of three questionnaires for neck pain. Joint Bone Spine 2004; 71: 31726.
  • 42
    Hoving JL, O'Leary EF, Niere KR, Green S, Buchbinder R. Validity of the Neck Disability Index, Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire, and problem elicitation technique for measuring disability associated with whiplash-associated disorders. Pain 2003; 102: 27381.
  • 43
    Stout WF. A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation. Psychometrika 1990; 55: 293325.
  • 44
    Hurwitz E, Carragee EJ, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, Nordin M, Guzman J, et al. Treatment of neck pain: noninvasive interventions. Results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Spine 2008; 33: S12352.
  • 45
    Smith RM, Linacre JM, Smith EV Jr. Guidelines for manuscripts. J Appl Meas 2003; 4: 198204.
  • 46
    Fitzpatrick R, Norquist JM, Jenkinson C, Reeves BC, Morris RW, Murray DW. A comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery. Qual Life Res 2004; 13: 3318.
  • 47
    McHorney CA, Haley SM, Ware JE Jr. Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10). II. Comparison of relative precision using Likert and Rasch scoring methods. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 45161.
  • 48
    Raczek AE, Ware JE, Bjorner JB, Gandek B, Haley SM, Aaronson NK, et al. Comparison of Rasch and summated rating scales constructed from SF-36 physical functioning items in seven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 120314.
  • 49
    Tennant A. Goal attainment scaling: current methodological challenges. Disabil Rehabil 2008; 29: 15838.
  • 50
    Kahler E, Rogausch A, Brunner E, Himmel W. A parametric analysis of ordinal quality-of-life data can lead to erroneous results. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 47580.