SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 2003; 81: 64656.
  • 2
    McGowan JA. Perspectives on the future of bone and joint diseases. J Rheumatol Suppl 2003; 67: 624.
  • 3
    Thomas E, Wilkie R, Peat G, Hill S, Dziedzic K, Croft P. The North Staffordshire Osteoarthritis Project (NorStOP): prospective, 3-year study of the epidemiology and management of clinical osteoarthritis in a general population of older adults. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004; 5: 2.
  • 4
    Bijl D, Dirven-Meijer PC, Opstelten W, Raaijmakers AJ, Scholten RJ, Eizenga WH, et al. The Dutch College of General Practitioners (NHG) practice guideline for non-traumatic knee complaints. Huisarts en Wetenschap 1998; 41: 34450. In Dutch.
  • 5
    Belo JN, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Raaijmakers AJ, van der Wissel F, Opstelten W. The Dutch College of General Practitioners (NHG) practice guideline for non-traumatic knee complaints. Huisarts en Wetenschap 2008; 51: 22940. In Dutch.
  • 6
    Bedson J, Jordan K, Croft P. The prevalence and history of knee osteoarthritis in general practice: a case-control study. Fam Pract 2005; 22: 1038.
  • 7
    Mallen CD, Peat G, Thomas E, Dunn KM, Croft PR. Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2007; 57: 65561.
  • 8
    Peat G, Thomas E, Handy J, Wood L, Dziedzic K, Myers H, et al. The Knee Clinical Assessment Study: CAS(K). A prospective study of knee pain and knee osteoarthritis in the general population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004; 5: 4.
  • 9
    Van der Waal JM, Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J. Determinants of the clinical course of musculoskeletal complaints in general practice: design of a cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4: 3.
  • 10
    Belo JN, Berger MY, Reijman M, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Prognostic factors of progression of osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review of observational studies. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57: 1326.
  • 11
    Van Dijk GM, Dekker J, Veenhof C, van den Ende CH, for the Carpa Study Group. Course of functional status and pain in osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of the literature. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 55: 77985.
  • 12
    Heintjes EM, Berger MY, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Knee disorders in primary care: design and patient selection of the HONEUR knee cohort. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2005; 6: 45.
  • 13
    Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 183340.
  • 14
    Roorda LD, Jones CA, Waltz M, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM, van der Eijken JW, et al. Satisfactory cross cultural equivalence of the Dutch WOMAC in patients with hip osteoarthritis waiting for arthroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 3642.
  • 15
    Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Steiner W, Stucki G. Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF-36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60: 83440.
  • 16
    Di Fabio RP, Boissonnault W. Physical therapy and health-related outcomes for patients with common orthopaedic diagnoses. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 27: 21930.
  • 17
    Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright RJ, Wright EA, Sledge CB, and the Kinemax Outcomes Group. Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83: 185664.
  • 18
    Saleh KJ, Macaulay A, Radosevich DM, Clark CR, Engh G, Gross A, et al. The Knee Society Index of Severity for failed total knee arthroplasty: development and validation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 392: 15365.
  • 19
    Bengtsson J, Mollborg J, Werner S. A study for testing the sensitivity and reliability of the Lysholm knee scoring scale. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1996; 4: 2731.
  • 20
    Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee scale for various chondral disorders of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86A: 113945.
  • 21
    Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; 198: 439.
  • 22
    Swinkels-Meewisse IE, Roelofs J, Verbeek AL, Oostendorp RA, Vlaeyen JW. Fear of movement/(re)injury, disability and participation in acute low back pain. Pain 2003; 105: 3719.
  • 23
    Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Boeren RG, van Eek H. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain 1995; 62: 36372.
  • 24
    Ambler G, Omar RZ, Royston P. A comparison of imputation techniques for handling missing predictor values in a risk model with a binary outcome. Stat Methods Med Res 2007; 16: 27798.
  • 25
    Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29: 103949.
  • 26
    Moser BK, Coombs LP. Odds ratios for a continuous outcome variable without dichotomizing. Stat Med 2004; 23: 184360.
  • 27
    Ragland DR. Dichotomizing continuous outcome variables: dependence of the magnitude of association and statistical power on the cutpoint. Epidemiology 1992; 3: 43440.
  • 28
    Streiner DL. Breaking up is hard to do: the heartbreak of dichotomizing continuous data. Can J Psychiatry 2002; 47: 2626.
  • 29
    Van der Waal JM, Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Scholten RJ, Bouter LM, et al. Course and prognosis of knee complaints in general practice. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 92030.
  • 30
    Belo JN, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Terwee CB, Heintjes EM, Koes B. Longitudinal and cross-sectional validity of the DynaPort knee test in adults with non-traumatic knee complaints in general practice. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 12718.
  • 31
    Van der Linden MW, Westert GP, de Bakker DH, Schellevis FG. Second National Study into diseases and actions in general practice: complaints and disorders in the population and in general practice. Utrecht: NIVEL, Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu; 2004. In Dutch.
  • 32
    Schwartz CE, Bode R, Repucci N, Becker J, Sprangers MA, Fayers PM. The clinical significance of adaptation to changing health: a meta-analysis of response shift. Qual Life Res 2006; 15: 153350.
  • 33
    Visser MR, Oort FJ, Sprangers MA. Methods to detect response shift in quality of life data: a convergent validity study. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 62939.
  • 34
    Thomas E, Peat G, Mallen C, Wood L, Lacey R, Duncan R, et al. Predicting the course of functional limitation among older adults with knee pain: do local signs, symptoms and radiographs add anything to general indicators? Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 13908.