1529-0131/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=897b81612b4ad6cae003112184adc709261d5f61)
1529-0131/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=04654f5ea3cbb01656383e0c0d04b16fd0a9a896)
Systemic Sclerosis
Improved endothelial function after endothelin receptor blockade in patients with systemic sclerosis
Article first published online: 28 MAY 2009
DOI: 10.1002/art.24502
Copyright © 2009 by the American College of Rheumatology
1529-0131/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=104d5c2bb8ef72deba26790b855af7ab80697a0e "Arthritis & Rheumatism")
Additional Information
How to Cite
Cardillo, C., Schinzari, F., Melina, D., Mores, N., Bosello, S., Peluso, G., Zoli, A. and Ferraccioli, G. (2009), Improved endothelial function after endothelin receptor blockade in patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 60: 1840–1844. doi: 10.1002/art.24502
Publication History
- Issue published online: 28 MAY 2009
- Article first published online: 28 MAY 2009
- Manuscript Accepted: 12 FEB 2009
- Manuscript Received: 8 SEP 2008
Funded by
- Fondi d'Ateneo grant from the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Objective
Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilator function may contribute to vascular damage in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). This study was undertaken to investigate whether increased activity of the endothelin 1 (ET-1) system plays a role in the occurrence of endothelial dysfunction in patients with SSc.
Methods
In 12 patients with SSc (6 with diffuse cutaneous SSc [dcSSc] and 6 with limited cutaneous SSc [lcSSc]), forearm blood flow responses to graded doses of acetylcholine (ACh) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) given intraarterially were assessed by plethysmography, during infusion of saline and following selective blockade of ETA receptors with BQ-123 (10 nmoles/minute).
Results
During saline infusion, the vasodilator response to ACh was blunted in patients with SSc as compared with that in healthy controls (P < 0.001), whereas the response to SNP was not different between groups (P = 0.27). The vasodilator effect of ETA receptor antagonism was higher in patients than in controls (P < 0.001), indicating enhanced ET-1–mediated vasoconstriction in SSc. In patients, ETA receptor blockade resulted in a potentiation of the vasodilator response to ACh (P < 0.001 versus saline), but did not affect the response to SNP (P = 0.31). Notably, both the vasodilator effect of ETA receptor antagonism and the improvement in the responsiveness to ACh following BQ-123 infusion were higher in patients with dcSSc than in those with lcSSc (P < 0.01).
Conclusion
ET-1–dependent vasoconstrictor tone is increased predominantly in the subgroup of SSc patients with dcSSc, in whom acute blockade of ETA receptors was able to improve impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilator function. Our results suggest novel vasculoprotective effects of ETA receptor antagonism and support further exploration of strategies that target the ET-1 pathway in SSc.