Dr. Smolen has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Centocor, Schering-Plough, Roche, UCB, and Wyeth (less than $10,000 each).
1529-0131/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=897b81612b4ad6cae003112184adc709261d5f61)
1529-0131/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=04654f5ea3cbb01656383e0c0d04b16fd0a9a896)
Rheumatoid Arthritis
You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Interleukin-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab and attainment of disease remission in rheumatoid arthritis: The role of acute-phase reactants
Article first published online: 28 DEC 2010
DOI: 10.1002/art.27740
Copyright © 2011 by the American College of Rheumatology
Additional Information
How to Cite
Smolen, J. S. and Aletaha, D. (2011), Interleukin-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab and attainment of disease remission in rheumatoid arthritis: The role of acute-phase reactants. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 63: 43–52. doi: 10.1002/art.27740
- †
Dr. Smolen has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Centocor, Schering-Plough, Roche, UCB, and Wyeth (less than $10,000 each).
- ‡
Dr. Aletaha has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, UCB, Abbott, Wyeth, and Schering-Plough (less than $10,000 each).
Publication History
- Issue published online: 28 DEC 2010
- Article first published online: 28 DEC 2010
- Accepted manuscript online: 22 OCT 2010 11:17AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 1 SEP 2010
- Manuscript Received: 6 JUL 2010
Funded by
- Roche
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Objective
To determine the effects of tocilizumab on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity and remission assessment, using measures that do or do not comprise acute-phase reactants.
Methods
Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) scores, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores, and the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) were calculated using data from tocilizumab trials in patients with RA in whom disease had remained active despite treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The CDAI does not contain an acute-phase reactant component. Disease activity states, including remission, were defined using established cut points; for the DAS28, an alternative cut point of <2.4 was also used.
Results
Changes in the DAS28, the SDAI score, and the CDAI score among patients receiving tocilizumab were significantly higher than those among patients receiving placebo, and the magnitude of these changes was similar for the SDAI and the CDAI. Among patients who achieved 50% improvement in disease activity according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria, only ∼20% required a reduction in acute-phase reactant values in order to fulfill the criteria. However, DAS28 remission rates were higher (even when using the lower cut point) than the SDAI and CDAI remission rates. Only a minority of tocilizumab-treated patients with DAS28 remission also had disease remission according to the SDAI (26%) or CDAI (∼21%). With infliximab treatment, SDAI and CDAI remission rates were of the same magnitude as those observed with tocilizumab treatment, and DAS28 remission rates were lower. Tocilizumab-treated patients with DAS28 remission but without CDAI remission had significantly higher swollen joint counts but lower erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESRs) compared with patients with SDAI or CDAI remission.
Conclusion
Disease activity in RA is reduced by tocilizumab treatment, irrespective of the type of composite measure used to evaluate disease activity. Remission rates were much higher using the DAS28 compared with the SDAI and CDAI, due to the high weight of the ESR in the DAS28 and the effect of tocilizumab on the ESR. Using the stringent SDAI and CDAI criteria, however, remission rates in patients treated with tocilizumab were in the same range as those seen in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.