SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Chang RW, Pellisier JM, Hazen GB. A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip. JAMA 1996; 275: 85865.
  • 2
    Rissanen P, Aro S, Sintonen H, Asikainen K, Slatis P, Paavolainen P. Costs and cost-effectiveness in hip and knee replacements: a prospective study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1997; 13: 57588.
  • 3
    NIH Consensus Panel. NIH Consensus Statement on total knee replacement December 8-10, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 132835.
  • 4
    Jordan KM, Arden NK, Doherty M, Bannwarth B, Bijlsma JW, Dieppe P, et al. EULAR Recommendations 2003: an evidence based approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis: report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 114555.
  • 5
    Hawker GA, Badley EM, Croxford R, Coyte PC, Glazier RH, Guan J, et al. A population based nested case-control study of the costs of hip and knee replacement surgery. Med Care 2009; 47: 73241.
  • 6
    Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, Paul J, Dittus R, Croxford R, et al. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement surgery: results from the Knee Replacement Patient Outcomes Research Team Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 16373.
  • 7
    Bunker JP, Frazier HS, Mostellar F. Improving health: measuring effects of medical care. Milbank Q 1994; 72: 22558.
  • 8
    Snider MG, MacDonald SJ, Pototschnik R. Waiting times and patient perspectives for total hip and knee arthroplasty in rural and urban Ontario. Can J Surg 2005; 48: 35560.
  • 9
    Davis AM, Agnidis Z, Badley E, Davey JR, Gafni A, Gollish J, et al. Waiting for hip revision surgery: the impact on patient disability. Can J Surg 2008; 51: 926.
  • 10
    Paterson MJ, DeBoer DP, Williams J, Bourne RB, Hawker G, Kreder H. Total hip and knee replacement. In: Tu JV, Pinfold SP, McColgan P, Laupacis A, editors. Access to health services in Ontario: ICES Atlas. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES); 2006.
  • 11
    Bistolfi A, Crova M, Rosso F, Titolo P, Ventura S, Massazza G. Dislocation rate after hip arthroplasty within the first postoperative year: 36 mm versus 28 mm femoral heads. Hip Int 2011; 21: 55964.
  • 12
    Antti-Poika I, Josefsson G, Konttinen Y, Lidgren L, Santavirta S, Sanzen L. Hip arthroplasty infection. Acta Orthop Scand 1990; 61: 1639.
  • 13
    Gill GS, Mills D, Joshi AB. Mortality following primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 4325.
  • 14
    Paterson JM, Williams JI, Kreder HJ, Mahomed NN, Gunraj N, Wang X, et al. Provider volumes and early outcomes of primary total joint replacement in Ontario. Can J Surg 2010; 53: 17583.
  • 15
    Sanmartin C, Murphy K, Choptain N, Conner-Spady B, McLaren L, Bohm E, et al. Appropriateness of healthcare interventions: concepts and scoping of the published literature. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2008; 24: 3429.
  • 16
    Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 96374.
  • 17
    Brander VA, Stulberg SD, Adams AD, Harden RN, Bruehl S, Stanos SP, et al. Predicting total knee replacement pain: a prospective, observational study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 416: 2736.
  • 18
    Fortin PR, Clarke AE, Joseph L, Liang MH, Tanzer M, Ferland D, et al. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 17228.
  • 19
    Nilsdotter AK, Petersson IF, Roos EM, Lohmander LS. Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 92330.
  • 20
    Quintana JM, Aguirre U, Barrio I, Orive M, Garcia S, Escobar A. Outcomes after total hip replacement based on patients' baseline status: what results can be expected? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012; 64: 56372.
  • 21
    Judge A, Arden NK, Kiran A, Price A, Javaid MK, Beard D, et al. Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes for hip and knee replacement surgery: identification of thresholds associated with satisfaction with surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94: 4128.
  • 22
    Arden NK, Kiran A, Judge A, Biant LC, Javaid MK, Murray DW, et al. What is a good patient reported outcome after total hip replacement? Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19: 15562.
  • 23
    Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 893900.
  • 24
    Frankel L, Sanmartin C, Conner-Spady B, Marshall DA, Freeman-Collins L, Wall A, et al. Osteoarthritis patients' perceptions of “appropriateness” for total joint replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012; 20: 96773.
  • 25
    Escobar A, Gonzalez M, Quintana JM, Vrotsou K, Bilbao A, Herrera-Espineira, C, et al. Patient acceptable symptom state and OMERACT-OARSI set of responder criteria in joint replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012; 20: 8792.
  • 26
    Perruccio AV, Power JD, Evans HM, Mahomed SR, Gandhi R, Mahomed NN, et al. Multiple joint involvement in total knee replacement for osteoarthritis: effects on patient-reported outcomes. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012; 64: 83846.
  • 27
    Stupar M, Cote P, French MR, Hawker GA. The association between low back pain and osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: a population-based cohort study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2010; 33: 34954.
  • 28
    Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, Williams JI, Harvey B, Glazier R, et al. Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 101622.
  • 29
    Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, Williams JI, Harvey B, Glazier R, et al. Determining the need for hip and knee arthroplasty: the role of clinical severity and patients' preferences. Med Care 2001; 39: 20616.
  • 30
    Hawker GA, Wright JG, Glazier RH, Coyte PC, Harvey B, Williams JI, et al. The effect of education and income on need and willingness to undergo total joint arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 33319.
  • 31
    Bellamy N. Pain assessment in osteoarthritis: experience with the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1989; 18: 147.
  • 32
    Bellamy N, Buchanan P, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt L. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol 1988; 1: 95108.
  • 33
    Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE Jr. The MOS short-form general health survey: reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care 1988; 26: 72435.
  • 34
    Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 47383.
  • 35
    Tu JV, Naylor CD, and the Steering Committee of the Provincial Adult Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. Coronary artery bypass mortality rates in Ontario: a Canadian approach to quality assurance in surgery. Circulation 1996; 94: 242933.
  • 36
    Newcombe HB. Handbook of record linkage: methods for health and statistical studies, administration and business. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
  • 37
    Badley E, Glazier R. Arthritis and related conditions in Ontario: ICES research atlas. 2nd ed. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2004.
  • 38
    Wyrwich KW, Nienaber NA, Tierney WM, Wolinsky FD. Linking clinical relevance and statistical significance in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. Med Care 1999; 37: 46978.
  • 39
    King MT. A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2011; 11: 17184.
  • 40
    Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Michel BA, Stucki G. Minimally clinically important rehabilitation effects in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 1318.
  • 41
    Tubach F, Ravaud P, Baron G, Falissard B, Logeart I, Bellamy N, et al. Evaluation of clinically relevant states in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the patient acceptable symptom state. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 347.
  • 42
    Pham T, van der Heijde D, Altman RD, Anderson JJ, Bellamy N, Hochberg M, et al. OMERACT-OARSI Initiative: Osteoarthritis Research Society International set of responder criteria for osteoarthritis clinical trials revisited. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004; 12: 38999.
  • 43
    Stone M. An asymptotic equivalence of choice of model by cross-validation and Akaike's criterion. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 1977; 39: 447.
  • 44
    Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.
  • 45
    Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159: 7026.
  • 46
    Chesworth BM, Mahomed N, Bourne R, Davis A, OJRR Study Group. Willingness to go through surgery again validated the WOMAC clinically important difference from THR/TKR surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 90718.
  • 47
    Judge A, Cooper C, Williams S, Dreinhoefer K, Dieppe P. Patient-reported outcomes one year after primary hip replacement in a European Collaborative Cohort. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010; 62: 4808.
  • 48
    Woolhead GM, Donovan JL, Dieppe PA. Outcomes of total knee replacement: a qualitative study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005; 44: 10327.
  • 49
    Croxford R, Hawker GA. Patterns of population use of total joint arthroplasty: focus on outcomes following a single primary TJA is too narrow [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2011; 63: S346.