SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Wakefield RJ, Gibbon WW, Conaghan PG, O'Connor P, McGonagle D, Pease C, et al.The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography.Arthritis Rheum2000;43:276270.
  • 2
    Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Jacobsen S, Klarlund M, Thomsen HS, Ostergaard M.Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis Rheum2003;48:95562.
  • 3
    Wakefield RJ, Balint PV, Szkudlarek M, Filippucci E, Backhaus M, D'Agostino MA, et al, and OMERACT 7 Special Interest Group.Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology.J Rheumatol2005;32:24857.
  • 4
    Scheel AK, Hermann KG, Ohrndorf S, Werner C, Schirmer C, Detert J, et al.Prospective 7 year follow up imaging study comparing radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis finger joints.Ann Rheum Dis2006;65:595600.
  • 5
    Moller B, Bonel H, Rotzetter M, Villiger PM, Ziswiler HR.Measuring finger joint cartilage by ultrasound as a promising alternative to conventional radiograph imaging.Arthritis Rheum2009;61:43541.
  • 6
    Filippucci E, da Luz KR, Di Geso L, Salaffi F, Tardella M, Carotti M, et al.Interobserver reliability of ultrasonography in the assessment of cartilage damage in rheumatoid arthritis.Ann Rheum Dis2010;69:18458.
  • 7
    Baillet A, Gaujoux-Viala C, Mouterde G, Pham T, Tebib J, Saraux A, et al.Comparison of the efficacy of sonography, magnetic resonance imaging and conventional radiography for the detection of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Rheumatology (Oxford)2011;50:113747.
  • 8
    Finzel S, Ohrndorf S, Englbrecht M, Stach C, Messerschmidt J, Schett G, et al.A detailed comparative study of high-resolution ultrasound and micro–computed tomography for detection of arthritic bone erosions.Arthritis Rheum2011;63:12316.
  • 9
    Dohn UM, Terslev L, Szkudlarek M, Hansen MS, Hetland ML, Hansen A, et al.Detection, scoring and volume assessment of bone erosions by ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with CT.Ann Rheum Dis2013;72:5304.
  • 10
    Funck-Brentano T, Gandjbakhch F, Etchepare F, Jousse-Joulin S, Miquel A, Cyteval C, et al.Prediction of radiographic damage in early arthritis by sonographic erosions and power Doppler signal: a longitudinal observational study.Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)2013;65:896902.
  • 11
    Colebatch AN, Edwards CJ, Ostergaard M, van der Heijde D, Balint PV, D'Agostino MA, et al.EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis.Ann Rheum Dis2013;72:80414.
  • 12
    Wakefield RJ, Green MJ, Marzo-Ortega H, Conaghan PG, Gibbon WW, McGonagle D, et al.Should oligoarthritis be reclassified? Ultrasound reveals a high prevalence of subclinical disease.Ann Rheum Dis2004;63:3825.
  • 13
    Walther M, Harms H, Krenn V, Radke S, Faehndrich TP, Gohlke F.Correlation of power Doppler sonography with vascularity of the synovial tissue of the knee joint in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis Rheum2001;44:3318.
  • 14
    Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Strandberg C, Klarlund M, Klausen T, Ostergaard M.Power Doppler ultrasonography for assessment of synovitis in the metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.Arthritis Rheum2001;44:201823.
  • 15
    Naredo E, Bonilla G, Gamero F, Uson J, Carmona L, Laffon A.Assessment of inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study of clinical evaluation with grey scale and power Doppler ultrasonography.Ann Rheum Dis2005;64:37581.
  • 16
    Wakefield RJ, Freeston JE, O'Connor P, Reay N, Budgen A, Hensor EM, et al.The optimal assessment of the rheumatoid arthritis hindfoot: a comparative study of clinical examination, ultrasound and high field MRI.Ann Rheum Dis2008;67:167882.
  • 17
    Takase K, Ohno S, Takeno M, Hama M, Kirino Y, Ihata A, et al.Simultaneous evaluation of long-lasting knee synovitis in patients undergoing arthroplasty by power Doppler ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced MRI in comparison with histopathology.Clin Exp Rheumatol2012;30:8592.
  • 18
    Naredo E, D'Agostino MA, Wakefield RJ, Moller I, Balint PV, Filippucci E, et al.Reliability of a consensus-based ultrasound score for tenosynovitis in rheumatoid arthritis.Ann Rheum Dis2013;72:132834.
  • 19
    Freeston JE, Wakefield RJ, Conaghan PG, Hensor EM, Stewart SP, Emery P.A diagnostic algorithm for persistence of very early inflammatory arthritis: the utility of power Doppler ultrasound when added to conventional assessment tools.Ann Rheum Dis2010;69:4179.
  • 20
    Filer A, de Pablo P, Allen G, Nightingale P, Jordan A, Jobanputra P, et al.Utility of ultrasound joint counts in the prediction of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with very early synovitis.Ann Rheum Dis2011;70:5007.
  • 21
    Nakagomi D, Ikeda K, Okubo A, Iwamoto T, Sanayama Y, Takahashi K, et al.Ultrasound can improve the accuracy of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis to predict the requirement for methotrexate treatment.Arthritis Rheum2013;65:8908.
  • 22
    Kawashiri SY, Suzuki T, Okada A, Yamasaki S, Tamai M, Nakamura H, et al.Musculoskeletal ultrasonography assists the diagnostic performance of the 2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis.Mod Rheumatol2013;23:3643.
  • 23
    Naredo E, Collado P, Cruz A, Palop MJ, Cabero F, Richi P, et al.Longitudinal power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammatory activity in early rheumatoid arthritis: predictive value in disease activity and radiologic progression.Arthritis Rheum2007;57:11624.
  • 24
    Brown AK, Conaghan PG, Karim Z, Quinn MA, Ikeda K, Peterfy CG, et al.An explanation for the apparent dissociation between clinical remission and continued structural deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis Rheum2008;58:295867.
  • 25
    Naredo E, Moller I, Cruz A, Carmona L, Garrido J.Power Doppler ultrasonographic monitoring of response to anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis Rheum2008;58:224856.
  • 26
    Fukae J, Isobe M, Kitano A, Henmi M, Sakamoto F, Narita A, et al.Radiographic prognosis of finger joint damage predicted by early alteration in synovial vascularity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: potential utility of power Doppler sonography in clinical practice.Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)2011;63:124753.
  • 27
    Ikeda K, Nakagomi D, Sanayama Y, Yamagata M, Okubo A, Iwamoto T, et al.Correlation of radiographic progression with the cumulative activity of synovitis estimated by power Doppler ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis: difference between patients treated with methotrexate and those treated with biological agents.J Rheumatol2013;40:196776.
  • 28
    Ogasawara M, Murayama G, Yamada Y, Nemoto T, Kageyama M, Toyama S, et al.Autofeedback from ultrasound images provides rapid improvement in palpation skills for identifying joint swelling in rheumatoid arthritis.J Rheumatol2012;39:120714.
  • 29
    Torp-Pedersen ST, Terslev L.Settings and artefacts relevant in colour/power Doppler ultrasound in rheumatology.Ann Rheum Dis2008;67:1439.
  • 30
    Ikeda K, Seto Y, Ohno S, Sakamoto F, Henmi M, Fukae J, et al.Analysis of the factors which influence the measurement of synovial power Doppler signals with semi-quantitative and quantitative measures–a pilot multicenter exercise in Japan.Mod Rheumatol2013. E-pub ahead of print.
  • 31
    Dougados M, Jousse-Joulin S, Mistretta F, d'Agostino MA, Backhaus M, Bentin J, et al.Evaluation of several ultrasonography scoring systems for synovitis and comparison to clinical examination: results from a prospective multicentre study of rheumatoid arthritis.Ann Rheum Dis2010;69:82833.
  • 32
    Hammer HB, Bolton-King P, Bakkeheim V, Berg TH, Sundt E, Kongtorp AK, et al.Examination of intra and interrater reliability with a new ultrasonographic reference atlas for scoring of synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Ann Rheum Dis2011;70:19958.
  • 33
    Dougados M, Devauchelle-Pensec V, Ferlet JF, Jousse-Joulin S, D'Agostino MA, Backhaus M, et al.The ability of synovitis to predict structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study between clinical examination and ultrasound.Ann Rheum Dis2013;72:66571.
  • 34
    Scheel AK, Hermann KG, Kahler E, Pasewaldt D, Fritz J, Hamm B, et al.A novel ultrasonographic synovitis scoring system suitable for analyzing finger joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis Rheum2005;52:73343.
  • 35
    Terslev L, Ellegaard K, Christensen R, Szkudlarek M, Schmidt WA, Jensen PS, et al.Head-to-head comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative ultrasound scoring systems for rheumatoid arthritis: reliability, agreement and construct validity.Rheumatology (Oxford)2012;51:20348.
  • 36
    Terslev L, Torp-Pedersen S, Qvistgaard E, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Bliddal H.Estimation of inflammation by Doppler ultrasound: quantitative changes after intra-articular treatment in rheumatoid arthritis.Ann Rheum Dis2003;62:104953.
  • 37
    Fukae J, Shimizu M, Kon Y, Tanimura K, Matsuhashi M, Kamishima T, et al.Screening for rheumatoid arthritis with finger joint power Doppler ultrasonography: quantification of conventional power Doppler ultrasonographic scoring.Mod Rheumatol2009;19:5026.
  • 38
    Kamishima T, Tanimura K, Henmi M, Narita A, Sakamoto F, Terae S, et al.Power Doppler ultrasound of rheumatoid synovitis: quantification of vascular signal and analysis of interobserver variability.Skeletal Radiol2009;38:46772.
  • 39
    Fukae J, Kon Y, Henmi M, Sakamoto F, Narita A, Shimizu M, et al.Change of synovial vascularity in a single finger joint assessed by power Doppler sonography correlated with radiographic change in rheumatoid arthritis: comparative study of a novel quantitative score with a semiquantitative score.Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)2010;62:65763.
  • 40
    Fukae J, Isobe M, Kitano A, Henmi M, Sakamoto F, Narita A, et al.Positive synovial vascularity in patients with low disease activity indicates smouldering inflammation leading to joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis: time-integrated joint inflammation estimated by synovial vascularity in each finger joint.Rheumatology (Oxford)2013;52:5238.
  • 41
    Grassi W, Gaywood I, Pande I, Filippucci E.From DAS 28 to SAS 1.Clin Exp Rheumatol2012;30:64951.
  • 42
    Naredo E, Rodriguez M, Campos C, Rodriguez-Heredia JM, Medina JA, Giner E, et al, for the Ultrasound Group of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology.Validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness of a twelve-joint simplified power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis Rheum2008;59:51522.
  • 43
    Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, Strunk J, Backhaus TM, Hartung W, et al.Evaluation of a novel 7-joint ultrasound score in daily rheumatologic practice: a pilot project.Arthritis Rheum2009;61:1194201.
  • 44
    Wakefield RJ, Freeston JE, Hensor EM, Bryer D, Quinn MA, Emery P.Delay in imaging versus clinical response: a rationale for prolonged treatment with anti–tumor necrosis factor medication in early rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis Rheum2007;57:15647.
  • 45
    Saleem B, Brown AK, Keen H, Nizam S, Freeston J, Karim Z, et al.Disease remission state in patients treated with the combination of tumor necrosis factor blockade and methotrexate or with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a clinical and imaging comparative study.Arthritis Rheum2009;60:191522.
  • 46
    Kawashiri SY, Kawakami A, Iwamoto N, Fujikawa K, Satoh K, Tamai M, et al.The power Doppler ultrasonography score from 24 synovial sites or 6 simplified synovial sites, including the metacarpophalangeal joints, reflects the clinical disease activity and level of serum biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Rheumatology (Oxford)2011;50:9625.
  • 47
    Peluso G, Michelutti A, Bosello S, Gremese E, Tolusso B, Ferraccioli G.Clinical and ultrasonographic remission determines different chances of relapse in early and long standing rheumatoid arthritis.Ann Rheum Dis2011;70:1725.
  • 48
    Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al.The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis Rheum1988;31:31524.
  • 49
    Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO III, et al.2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative.Arthritis Rheum2010;62:256981.
  • 50
    Bruyn GA, Moller I, Garrido J, Bong D, d'Agostino MA, Iagnocco A, et al.Reliability testing of tendon disease using two different scanning methods in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Rheumatology (Oxford)2012;51:165561.
  • 51
    Prevoo ML, van 't Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL.Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight–joint counts: development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis Rheum1995;38:448.