Original Article
Role of initial NSAID choice and patient risk factors in the prevention of NSAID gastropathy: A decision analysis
Article first published online: 7 FEB 2002
DOI: 10.1002/art1.10159
Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Rheumatology
Additional Information
How to Cite
Fendrick, A. M., Bandekar, R. R., Chernew, M. E. and Scheiman, J. M. (2002), Role of initial NSAID choice and patient risk factors in the prevention of NSAID gastropathy: A decision analysis. Arthritis Care & Research, 47: 36–43. doi: 10.1002/art1.10159
Publication History
- Issue published online: 7 FEB 2002
- Article first published online: 7 FEB 2002
- Manuscript Accepted: 1 JUL 2001
- Manuscript Received: 5 APR 2001
Funded by
- SmithKline Beecham
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- NSAIDs;
- Gastropathy;
- Economic effects
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the role of initial nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) choice in the prevention of NSAID gastropathy, based on relative clinical and economic effects.
Methods
To mimic clinical practice, a symptom-driven decision analytic model was constructed to compare 2 treatment strategies for long-term users of NSAIDs over a 1-year period: Strategy 1—generic NSAID used initially, and safer, more expensive NSAID reserved for treatment failures due to symptomatic gastropathy; and Strategy 2—safer, more expensive NSAID used in all instances. The only distinction between the strategies was the choice of initial NSAID. NSAIDs differed in gastrointestinal safety profiles and acquisition costs. The use and impact of antisecretory medications were included in the model. Because published data on patients' ulcer risk and relative NSAID safety show considerable variability, sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate the key clinical outcomes and costs.
Result
For patients without risk factors for NSAID ulcers (average risk), the model estimated that the strategy restricting use of the safer NSAID resulted in more symptomatic ulcers (Strategy 1, 2.58; Strategy 2, 0.73) and ulcer-related complications (Strategy 1, 1.18; Strategy 2, 0.23) per 100 patient years. The restricted strategy led to a significantly lower cost per patient treated (Strategy 1, $239; Strategy 2, $831 per year). In the principal analysis, the incremental costs to prevent symptomatic and complicated ulcers were $31,900 and $56,700, respectively. The estimated incremental cost per ulcer avoided was sensitive to the relative protection provided by the safer NSAID and fell dramatically as the patients' ulcer risk was increased above average risk.
Conclusion
Unrestricted use of NSAIDs that reduce the risk of symptomatic ulcers has the potential to produce important clinical benefits at incremental cost. The impressive impact of ulcer risk on the incremental cost per ulcer prevented warrants increased attention to risk factor identification when NSAIDs are prescribed.

2151-4658/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=75d1dd4933b4687fdb365bb32190b0a4ef453ee7)
2151-4658/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=a36ba6af41bd9af370864f6461a516746a709d31)
1529-0131a/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=4b71f39689e424fbb0e6725b1c033cc646a4272b)