SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    December S.K. Ikah, Gabrielle M. Finn, Meenakshi Swamy, Pamela M. White, John C. McLachlan, Clinical vignettes improve performance in anatomy practical assessment, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2015, 8, 3
  2. 2
    Amanda J. Meyer, Stanley I. Innes, Norman J. Stomski, Anthony J. Armson, Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2015, 8, 4
  3. You have free access to this content3
    Claire F. Smith, Bruce McManus, The integrated anatomy practical paper: A robust assessment method for anatomy education today, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2015, 8, 1
  4. 4
    Alain J. Azzi, Christopher J. Ramnanan, Jennifer Smith, Éric Dionne, Alireza Jalali, To quiz or not to quiz: Formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2015, 8, 4
  5. 5
    Anja Böckers, Christian Mayer, Tobias Maria Böckers, Does learning in clinical context in anatomical sciences improve examination results, learning motivation, or learning orientation?, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2014, 7, 1
  6. 6
    Margaret K. Pratten, Deborah Merrick, Steven A. Burr, Group in-course assessment promotes cooperative learning and increases performance, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2014, 7, 3
  7. 7
    Guiyun Zhang, Bruce A. Fenderson, Richard R. Schmidt, J. Jon Veloski, Equivalence of students' scores on timed and untimed anatomy practical examinations, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2013, 6, 5
  8. 8
    Philip A. Fabrizio, Oral anatomy laboratory examinations in a physical therapy program, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2013, 6, 4