Validation of a method for measuring medical students' critical reflections on professionalism in gross anatomy

Authors

  • Christopher M. Wittich,

    Corresponding author
    • Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Wojciech Pawlina,

    1. Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
    2. Program in Professionalism and Ethics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Richard L. Drake,

    1. Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jason H. Szostek,

    1. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Darcy A. Reed,

    1. Program in Professionalism and Ethics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
    2. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Nirusha Lachman,

    1. Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jennifer M. McBride,

    1. Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jayawant N. Mandrekar,

    1. Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Thomas J. Beckman

    1. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
    Search for more papers by this author

Correspondence to: Dr. Christopher M. Wittich, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. E-mail: wittich.christopher@mayo.edu

Abstract

Improving professional attitudes and behaviors requires critical self reflection. Research on reflection is necessary to understand professionalism among medical students. The aims of this prospective validation study at the Mayo Medical School and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine were: (1) to develop and validate a new instrument for measuring reflection on professionalism, and (2) determine whether learner variables are associated with reflection on the gross anatomy experience. An instrument for assessing reflections on gross anatomy, which was comprised of 12 items structured on five-point scales, was developed. Factor analysis revealed a three-dimensional model including low reflection (four items), moderate reflection (five items), and high reflection (three items). Item mean scores ranged from 3.05 to 4.50. The overall mean for all 12 items was 3.91 (SD = 0.52). Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) was satisfactory for individual factors and overall (Factor 1 α = 0.78; Factor 2 α = 0.69; Factor 3 α = 0.70; Overall α = 0.75). Simple linear regression analysis indicated that reflection scores were negatively associated with teamwork peer scores (P = 0.018). The authors report the first validated measurement of medical student reflection on professionalism in gross anatomy. Critical reflection is a recognized component of professionalism and may be important for behavior change. This instrument may be used in future research on professionalism among medical students. Anat Sci Educ 6: 232–238. © 2012 American Association of Anatomists.

Ancillary