Cited in:


This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Todd C. Shoepe, Dana K. Cavedon, Joseph M. Derian, Celine S. Levy, Amy Morales, The ATLAS project: The effects of a constructionist digital laboratory project on undergraduate laboratory performance, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2014, 7, 2
  2. 2
    Louisa Holaday, Daniel Selvig, Joel Purkiss, Michael Hortsch, Preference of Interactive Electronic Versus Traditional Learning Resources by University of Michigan Medical Students during the First Year Histology Component, Medical Science Educator, 2013, 23, 4, 607


  3. 3
    Michele L. Barbeau, Marjorie Johnson, Candace Gibson, Kem A. Rogers, The development and assessment of an online microscopic anatomy laboratory course, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2013, 6, 4
  4. 4
    Antonio Campos-Sánchez, Miguel-Ángel Martín-Piedra, Víctor Carriel, Miguel González-Andrades, Ingrid Garzón, María-Carmen Sánchez-Quevedo, Miguel Alaminos, Reception learning and self-discovery learning in histology: Students' perceptions and their implications for assessing the effectiveness of different learning modalities, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2012, 5, 5
  5. 5
    Paras Singh Minhas, Arundhati Ghosh, Leah Swanzy, The effects of passive and active learning on student preference and performance in an undergraduate basic science course, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2012, 5, 4
  6. 6
    Jeffrey Smirle, Adam D. Parent, Maryssa Canuel, Craig A. Mandato, Undergraduate Histology Education: Fostering an Engaging and Interactive Environment is the Key, Medical Science Educator, 2012, 22, 4, 244


  7. 7
    Eldridge G. Doubleday, Valerie D. O'Loughlin, Alison F. Doubleday, The virtual anatomy laboratory: Usability testing to improve an online learning resource for anatomy education, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2011, 4, 6