Cited in:


This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Leonardo Oliveira Reis, Osamu Ikari, Khaled A. Taha-Neto, Antonio Gugliotta, Fernandes Denardi, Delivery of a urology online course using moodle versus didactic lectures methods, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2015, 84, 2, 149


  2. 2
    Amanda J. Meyer, Stanley I. Innes, Norman J. Stomski, Anthony J. Armson, Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2015, 8, 3
  3. 3
    Jesús García Laborda, Mercedes López Santiago, Nuria Otero De Juan, Alfredo Álvarez Álvarez, Communicative Language Testing: Implications for Computer Based Language Testing in French for Specific Purposes, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2014, 5, 5


  4. 4
    Gary Kish, Samuel A. Cook, Gréta Kis, Computer-assisted learning in anatomy at the International Medical School in Debrecen, Hungary: A preliminary report, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2013, 6, 1
  5. 5
    Guiyun Zhang, Bruce A. Fenderson, Richard R. Schmidt, J. Jon Veloski, Equivalence of students' scores on timed and untimed anatomy practical examinations, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2013, 6, 5
  6. 6
    Philip A. Fabrizio, Oral anatomy laboratory examinations in a physical therapy program, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2013, 6, 4
  7. 7
    Hassan Sami Shaibah, Cees P. M. van der Vleuten, The validity of multiple choice practical examinations as an alternative to traditional free response examination formats in gross anatomy, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2013, 6, 3
  8. 8
    Ahmed Yaqinuddin, Muhammad Zafar, Muhammad Faisal Ikram, Paul Ganguly, What is an objective structured practical examination in anatomy?, Anatomical Sciences Education, 2013, 6, 2