How much anatomy is enough?
Article first published online: 18 JUL 2008
Copyright © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Anatomical Sciences Education
Volume 1, Issue 4, pages 184–188, July/August 2008
How to Cite
Bergman, E. M., Prince, K. J.A.H., Drukker, J., van der Vleuten, C. P.M. and Scherpbier, A. J.J.A. (2008), How much anatomy is enough?. Anat Sci Ed, 1: 184–188. doi: 10.1002/ase.35
- Issue published online: 18 JUL 2008
- Article first published online: 18 JUL 2008
- Manuscript Revised: 3 JUN 2008
- Manuscript Accepted: 3 JUN 2008
- Manuscript Received: 25 APR 2008
- anatomy teaching;
- anatomy education;
- problem-based learning;
- integrated curriculum;
- anatomical knowledge
Innovations in undergraduate medical education, such as integration of disciplines and problem based learning, have given rise to concerns about students' knowledge of anatomy. This article originated from several studies investigating the knowledge of anatomy of students at the eight Dutch medical schools. The studies showed that undergraduate students uniformly perceived deficiencies in their anatomical knowledge when they started clinical training regardless of their school's didactic approach. A study assessing students' actual knowledge of clinical anatomy revealed no relationship between students' knowledge and the school's didactic approach. Test failure rates based on absolute standards set by different groups of experts were indicative of unsatisfactory levels of anatomical knowledge, although standards differed markedly between the groups of experts. Good test performance by students seems to be related to total teaching time for anatomy, teaching in clinical context, and revisiting anatomy topics in the course of the curriculum. These factors appeared to outweigh the effects of disciplinary integration orwhether the curriculum was problem-based or traditional. Anat Sci Ed 2008. © 2008 American Association of Anatomists.