Research Article
Modeling the information-seeking behavior of social scientists: Ellis's study revisited
Article first published online: 25 FEB 2003
DOI: 10.1002/asi.10244
Copyright © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Issue
1532-2890/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=c9d33fcfc2cef6291d3cfd7d7be1de8ca023f1c7)
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Volume 54, Issue 6, pages 570–587, April 2003
Additional Information
How to Cite
Meho, L. I. and Tibbo, H. R. (2003), Modeling the information-seeking behavior of social scientists: Ellis's study revisited. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 54: 570–587. doi: 10.1002/asi.10244
Publication History
- Issue published online: 19 MAR 2003
- Article first published online: 25 FEB 2003
- Manuscript Revised: 8 NOV 2002
- Manuscript Accepted: 8 NOV 2002
- Manuscript Received: 14 JUN 2002
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
This paper revises David Ellis's information-seeking behavior model of social scientists, which includes six generic features: starting, chaining, browsing, differentiating, monitoring, and extracting. The paper uses social science faculty researching stateless nations as the study population. The description and analysis of the information-seeking behavior of this group of scholars is based on data collected through structured and semi-structured electronic mail interviews. Sixty faculty members from 14 different countries were interviewed by e-mail. For reality check purposes, face-to-face interviews with five faculty members were also conducted. Although the study confirmed Ellis's model, it found that a fuller description of the information-seeking process of social scientists studying stateless nations should include four additional features besides those identified by Ellis. These new features are: accessing, networking, verifying, and information managing. In view of that, the study develops a new model, which, unlike Ellis's, groups all the features into four interrelated stages: searching, accessing, processing, and ending. This new model is fully described and its implications on research and practice are discussed. How and why scholars studied here are different than other academic social scientists is also discussed.

1532-2890/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=d833098325c9f1060bcbee51adf276c155608167)
1532-2890/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=661179918edb4fa732edfd3408eb050a6ce87809)
1532-2890/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=1ef8a363944134c502cbffa1937878a71b4cc635)