SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adamic, L., Zhang, J., Bakshy, E., & Ackerman, M. (2008). Knowledge sharing and Yahoo! Answers: Everyone knows something. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on the World Wide Web (ACM WWW '08) (pp. 665674). New York: ACM Press.
  • Agichtein, E., Liu, Y., & Bian, J. (2009). Modeling information-seeker satisfaction in community question answering. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD) 3(2).
  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Bernhard, D., & Gurevych, I. (2009). Answering learners' questions by retrieving question paraphrases from social Q&A sites. In Proceedings of the Third ACL Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, (pp. 4452). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  • Bian, J., Liu, Y., Agichtein, E., & Zha, H. (2008). A few bad votes too many? Towards robust ranking in social media. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Adversarial Information Retrieval (AIRWeb'08) (pp. 5360). New York: ACM Press.
  • Cao, X., Cong, G., Cui, B., & Jensen, C.S. (2010). A generalized framework of exploring category information for question retrieval in community question answer archives. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on the World Wide Web (ACM WWW'10) (pp. 201210). New York: ACM Press.
  • Cao, X., Cong, G., Cui, B., Jensen, C.S., & Zhang, C. (2009). The use of categorization information in language models for question retrieval. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (ACM CIKM'09) (pp. 265274). New York: ACM Press.
  • Chen, Y., Ho, T.-H., & Kim, Y.-M. (2010). Knowledge market design: A field experiment at Google Answers. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 12(4), 641664.
  • Fiore, A.T., LeeTiernan, S., & Smith, M.A. (2002). Observed behavior and perceived value in Usenet newsgroups: Bridging the gap. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing (ACM CHI' 02) (pp. 323330). New York: ACM Press.
  • Gazan, R. (2006). Specialists and synthesists in a question answering community. In Proceedings of the 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science & Technology (ASIST'06). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
  • Gazan, R. (2007a). Seekers, sloths and social reference: Homework questions submitted to a question-answering community. New Review of Hypermedia & Multimedia, 13(2), 239248.
  • Gazan, R. (2007b). Understanding the rogue user. In: Diane Nahl & Dania Bilal, (Eds.). Information & emotion: The emergent affective paradigm in information behavior research and theory. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 177185.
  • Gazan, R. (2009). When online communities become self-aware. Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.
  • Gazan, R. (2010). Microcollaborations in a social Q&A community. Information Processing & Management, 46(6), 693702.
  • Gazan, R. (2011). Redesign as an act of violence: Disrupted interaction patterns and the fragmenting of a social Q&A community. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM CHI'11). New York: ACM Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Structuration theory: Past, present and future. In Bryant, C.G.A. & Jary, D. (Eds.) Giddens' theory of structuration: A critical appreciation (pp. 201221). New York: Routledge.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Allen Lane.
  • Graesser, A., McMahen, C., & Johnson, B. (1994). Question asking and answering. In Gernsbacher, M. (Ed.) Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 517538). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Hansen, D.L., Ackerman, M.S., Resnick, P.J., & Munson, S. (2007). Virtual community maintenance with a collaborative repository. In Proceedings of the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST 2007). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859) (pp. 12431248).
  • Harper, F.M., Moy, D., & Konstan, J.A. (2009). Facts or friends?: Distinguishing informational and conversational questions in social Q&A sites. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing (ACM CHI'09) (pp. 759768). New York: ACM press.
  • Harper, F.M., Raban, D., Rafaeli, S., & Konstan, J.A. (2008). Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing (ACM CHI'08) (pp. 865874). New York: ACM Press.
  • Harper. F.M., Weinberg, J., Logie, J., & Konstan, J.A. (2010). Question types in social Q&A sites. First Monday, 15(7). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/2913/2571
  • Ignatova, K., Toprak, C., Bernhard, D., & Gurevych, I. (2009). Annotating question types in social Q&A sites. Tagungsband des GSCL Symposiums ‘Sprachtechnologie und eHumanities,’ 44–49. Essen, Germany: Abteilung für Informatik und Angewandte Kognitionswissenschaft Fakultät für Ingenieurwissenschaften Universität Duisburg-Essen.
  • Jeon, J., Croft, B., & Lee, J.-H. (2005). Finding similar questions in large question and answer archives. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (ACM CIKM'05) (pp. 8490). New York: ACM Press.
  • Jeon, J., Croft, B., Lee, J.-H., & Park, S. (2006). A framework to predict the quality of answers with non-textual features. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR'06) (pp. 228235). New York: ACM Press.
  • Jeon, G.Y., Kim, Y.-M., & Chen, Y. (2010). Re-examining price as a predictor of answer quality in an online Q&A site. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing (ACM CHI'10). New York: ACM Press.
  • Kim, S. (2010). Questioners' credibility judgments of answers in a social question and answer site. Information Research, 15(1). Retrieved from http://informationr.net/ir/15–2/paper432.html
  • Kim, S., & Oh, S. (2009). Users' relevance criteria for evaluating answers in a social Q&A site. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 716727.
  • Kim, S., Oh, J., & Oh, S. (2009). Best-answer selection criteria in a social Q&A site from the user-centered relevance perspective. Proceedings of the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST'07). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
  • Kling, R., McKim, J., & King, A. (2003). A bit more to IT: Scholarly communication forums as socio-technical interaction networks. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 127148.
  • Kling, R., Rosenbaum, H., & Sawyer, S. (2005). Understanding and communicating social informatics: A framework for studying and teaching the human contexts of information and communication technologies. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
  • Kramer, C. (1956). Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics, 12(3), 307310.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lin, J. (2007). Is question answering better than information retrieval? Towards a task-based evaluation framework for question series. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 212219). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  • Liu, Y., Li, S., Cao, Y., Lin, C.-Y., Han, D., & Yu, Y. (2009). Understanding and summarizing answers in community-based question answering services. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2008), (pp. 497504). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  • Lueg, C.P. (2008). Querying information systems or interacting with intermediaries? Towards understanding the informational capacity of online communities. In Proceedings of the 71st American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting (ASIST'08). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
  • Lueg, C.P., & Fisher, D. (Eds.) (2003). From Usenet to CoWebs: Interacting with social information spaces. London: Springer.
  • Nam, K.K., Ackerman, M.S., & Adamic, L.A. (2009). Questions in, Knowledge-iN?: A study of Naver's question answering community. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing (ACM CHI'09) (pp. 779788). New York: ACM Press.
  • Pomerantz, J. (2005). Linguistic analysis of question taxonomies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(7), 715728.
  • Raban, D.R. (2007). User-centered evaluation of information: A research challenge. Internet Research, 17(3): 306322.
  • Raban, D.R. (2009). Self-presentation and the value of information on Q&A sites. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(12), 24652473.
  • Raban, D.R., & Harper, F.M. (2008). Motivations for answering questions online. In Caspi, D., & Azran, T. (Eds.) New Media and Innovative Technologies. Be'er Shiva, Israel: Burda Research Center and Ben Gurion University.
  • Rafaeli, S., Raban, D., & Ravid, G. (2007). Social and economic incentives in Google Answers. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(1), 111.
  • Richardson, M., & White, R.W. (2011). Supporting synchronous social Q&A throughout the question lifecycle. In Proceedings of the ACM World Wide Web Conference (ACM WWW2011), New York: ACM Press.
  • Rodrigues, E.M., Milic-Frayling, N., & Fortuna, B. (2008). Social tagging behaviour in community-driven question answering. In Proceedings of IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WIIAT'08) (pp. 112119). New York: ACM Press.
  • Rosenbaum, H., & Shachaf, P. (2010). A structuration approach to online communities of practice: The case of Q&A communities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 19331944.
  • Shachaf, P. (2009). The paradox of expertise: Is the Wikipedia reference desk as good as your library? Journal of Documentation, 65(6), 977996.
  • Shachaf, P. (2010). Social reference: A unifying theory. Library & Information Science Research, 32(1), 6676.
  • Shachaf, P., & Rosenbaum, H. (2009, February). Online social reference: A research agenda through a STIN framework. Paper presented at the iConference 2009, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Shah, C. (2010). Collaborative information seeking: A literature review. In Woodsworth, A. (Ed.) Advances in Librarianship, 32 (pp. 333). Bradford, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Shah, C. (2011). Effectiveness and user satisfaction in Yahoo! Answers. First Monday 16(2). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/3092/2769
  • Shah, C., Oh, J.S., & Oh, S. (2008). Exploring characteristics and effects of user participation in online social Q&A sites. First Monday, 13(9). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/2182/2028
  • Shah, C., Oh, J.S., & Oh, S. (2009). Research agenda for social Q&A. Library & Information Science Research, 31(4), 205209.
  • Shah, C., & Pomerantz, J. (2010). Evaluating and predicting answer quality in community QA. In Proceedings of ACM Conference in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR'10). New York: ACM Press.
  • Smith, M. (2002). Tools for navigating large social cyberspaces. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 5155.
  • Sudweeks, F., McLaughlin, M., & Rafaeli, S. (1996). Network and Netplay: Virtual Groups on the Internet. Cambridge, MA: AAAI/MIT Press.
  • Turner, T., Smith, M.A., Fisher, D., & Welser, H.T. (2005). Picturing Usenet: Mapping computer-mediated collective action. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/turner.html
  • Tutos, A., & Mollá, D. (2010). A study on the use of search engines for answering clinical questions. In Maeder, A. & Hansen, D. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth Australasian Workshop on Health Informatics and Knowledge Management (HIKM 2010), Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology (CRPIT), Vol. 108, (pp. 6168), Sydney, Australia: Australian Computer Society.
  • Viegas, F.B., & Smith, M. (2004). Newsgroup crowds and AuthorLines: Visualizing the activity of individuals in conversational cyberspaces. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-37). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.
  • Voorhees, E.M. (2003). Overview of the TREC 2003 question answering track. In Proceedings of the 12th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-2003) (pp. 5468). Washington, DC: NIST.
  • Welser, H.T., Gleave, E., Barash, V., Smith, M., & Meckes, J. (2009). Whither the experts? Social affordances and the cultivation of experts in community Q&A systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (pp. 450455). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yang, J., Adamic, L.A., & Ackerman, M.S. (2008). Crowdsourcing and knowledge sharing: Strategic user behavior on Taskcn. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (ACM EC'05) (pp. 246255). New York: ACM Press.
  • Zhang, J., Ackerman, M., & Adamic, L. (2007). Expertise networks in online communities: Structure and algorithms. In Proceedings of the ACM World Wide Web Conference (ACM WWW'07) (pp. 221230). New York: ACM Press.